No I think you're missing my point. It's exactly because we are only looking at the Pleiades because Michael specifically said they are there that is making me annoyed with the whole thing. We made the assumption early on that the Barnacles were in the Pleiades because the UA's pointed there, then Michael basically says that the UA's aren't pointing at Merope because of the barnacles, so our one in game connection is gone. So either we were expected to somehow work out his "obvious" reason for why the Barnacles were in Nebulae and then search some Nebulae for untold amounts of manhours OR there was some other clue, and all my requests for a simple yes/no on whether there even is another in game clue have gone unanswered and I have spent a whole lot of time searching for clues.
If there is some in game clue I wouldn't mind, but then I'd have liked for Michael to give us hints towards where that is, not hints towards where the Barnacles are, the very fact that he felt he needed to do it this way suggests to me that this really is as vague as I feared.
It's also irritating that he even needed to come onto these forums in the first place, GalNet exists for this kind of information to be shared with the community.
Anyway this is bringing up old stuff that I had already mentioned earlier today, I am not content with how this is going and will not be spending more time in the Pleiades because after 30+ hours all told searching planets I've grown very much bored of it.