Vote for Imperial Cutter 8 Class Power Distributor

I'd be really happy to see FDev do something akin to (almost) what they did the FdL ... they put up some RP blurb on how ZP were going to retrofit the FdL

What i'd love to see with the Cutter is a second 'C' spec (c for combat) model .... happily drop the twin class 8 internals and just put a single class 7 in-place of them, but buff the turn rate and (maybe) tweak the distribution and maybe even drop the FSD down a class to make it in-line (more or less by weight balancing) with the corvette

Ditching the class 8's mean it won't have so much shielding, it'll lose 384t of cargo space thus taking it away from the utility of trade but would give us Imperials a ship to love in combat.... more reliant on that turn rate (but at least making it fly akin to an anaconda - at least roughly in the same ball park)

Hell, even make it pricier if you must .... but just take away from the super-trader and give us something that is enjoyable
 
Cutter dont needs PD 8 class as it would make it too powerfull... it would eat anacondas and corvettes as it would not lose in terms of sustain firepower... it already can outtank them with its size 8 shields and cells..

What it needs is silghty better turn rates and better cooling system. Same like with FDL buff.
 
"Class 8 shields" are literally meaningless as a balance point. If FD wanted, they could have a ship with such a high shield coefficient that it would outclass all other ships in shield strength with a Class 1 E rated shield.

When they were announced, I expected them to have the same or even better power distributors than the Anaconda due to their descriptions and the Anaconda's historical role as a cargo hauler.

Truth be told, the Anaconda needs a pass and downgrading to the Class 7 power distributor and reduction of it's pitch rate. It's a problem ship from early days that causes design expectations and problems with the Cutter and Corvette. The Cutter has it worse of the two.
 
I'd love to see you truck 720 tons of slaves in an A6 prismatic shielded Conda.

As if nobody has ever traded in a Type 6 / 7 / 9 before.

Trading in a shieldless Conda does more for my nerves than a Valium.

Compared to being in any other trading ship ( including a clipper ) with shields.
 
Probably not needed, as the whole 'A,B,C' class in module size '8,7,6' is being removed / overhauled in the Engineers patch.
 
Last edited:
Awful idea. Sounds like someone wants the cutter to be best at everything.

Its about equal to ask for my Python to be a nimble fighter in agility again.
 
Last edited:
should also give corvette class 8 shield then.

And the T-7 too. :p

Size 6 FSD on the FDL

combine aDS and DSS

as for class 8 on Cutter, it's not needed at all.

Can we get another Large hardpoint on the Vulture too?


Yeah ok, we're getting towards "Buff all the ships" again. Seriously though can we not consign all these Buff/nerf threads somewhere... Like maybe the "Ships" sub-forum?

Oh, can we also swap 2 small to 2 medium on Corvette and let it jump 15Ly at least?
But, well, whatever we post here, only FD decide what to be.


You simply can't buff something without buffing other stuff or we end up with the FDL. No compromise, can max everything, C4 HP and x6 C0 HPs the only thing that makes it balanced is its 'lower' MLF; still best combat ship in the game IMO


C8 PD for the Cutter, nerf boost speed to 300 m/s at best case or remove one C8 internal slot and give it one more C6.

No buff without a compromise or we have another FDL-story.
 
Last edited:
I want my sidewinder to be able to fit the same class 6 lasers as the stations use, it's unfair that I can't fight back when it fires on me.
 
C8 PD for the Cutter, nerf boost speed to 300 m/s at best case or remove one C8 internal slot and give it one more C6.

No buff without a compromise or we have another FDL-story.

Good idea. I wouldn't mind swapping an 8 slot for a 6 in exchange for a bigger power distributor. I think the speed is fine as it is, particularly considering it's sucktacular pitch and generally awful handling.
 
Back
Top Bottom