The Star Citizen Thread v 4

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
I don't get why some can't stand others to mock, criticize the game, a fortiori in a remote forum of another spacesim game.

SC fans could (and surely are) mock ED in RSI forums, or they could even burn dozens of DBOBE bobbleheads, I won't give a pretty flock. And in the same time I'll never go to RSI forums to "defend" ED there.

Well, in all fairness, we can go a play a pretty functional game to pass the time. SC fans...not so much. :p
 
Nice try but you should show the whole picture.

So let's see, it's ok to hate, mock, despise dreamy CIG / Chris Roberts / Sandi and specialy it's "cultists" because they are enthusiastic about a future game, basically fuelling fun through expectations and dreams.
But if it's Mass Effect, a game already delayed multiple times and that the only gameplay footage shown is a lanky tech demo from 5 years ago, it's all good if goons doing it lol

Sure but it wasn't a attack was it? It was a perspective of a public crowd funded game. GORF's post's are well respected because they offer researched sources, praise to people working on the game and criticism where he thinks fit. You must remember its his opinion and the reason I posted was to show that sa forums are not a total hate thread and that there is a very good analysis of star citizen and why it can be construed as disaster waiting to happen. I am free to have this opinion and share it.


Gorf is talking about gaming. space games? I don't see why you trawled his posting and about what?


so its his opinion. he hasn't posted here. I posted his post because its relevant to star citizen and makes a clear and concise point. In no way do you refer to the points he made at all. Yet you want to show his post he made on another forum, that you feel is important without talking about the post he made that is relevant to this thread?

want even dignify your gif as it refers to your post most poignantly.


yes this is ben. I laughed at the pic with his comments added to them. wont repeat what he said here, but it was his website :eek: In all nothing in your reply has added to the conversation. I posted a quote that adds to the discussion about star citizen. I am sorry if you don't agree with it but this post adds nothing to and I think deflects from what is an reasonable post about the game.
 
Last edited:

Thank you.

H2VFFJp.jpg



I'm done with SC.
4 years, $250 and a messy, buggy tech demo that plays like a Freelancer is not what I was originally promised or signed up for.
Let's see what they respond.
 
I don't get why some can't stand others to mock, criticize the game, a fortiori in a remote forum of another spacesim game.

SC fans could (and surely are) mock ED in RSI forums, or they could even burn dozens of DBOBE bobbleheads, I won't give a pretty flock. And in the same time I'll never go to RSI forums to "defend" ED there.

They do continually, which is why this whole thing is laughable. ED is 'boring' with an awful slow flight model and no content. If ED was in development hell and missing deadlines left right and centre they would be all over it like a rash, Star Citizen fanatics like to play the victim card. Sometimes they blame Smart, other times the 'toxic' ED community, sometimes the 'clickbait' press. Choose your poison! One thing they continually fail to do is ask the hard questions and demand answers of the company they are funding which IMO is a key reason this project has gotten so badly derailed since my original pledge in 2012.
 
Last edited:
Even after decades of gaming it's really baffling to me how many amazing games we currently have the chance to play.
All this, at a time when we apparently needed saving from all those bad publisher games and evil console ports ;)
I think, as gamers, we should be very grateful.

Just for the record in the last few days I've been dabbling in:

Duskers
Overwatch (with some ex TF2 buddies)
ED engineers patch (yes I still play it)
Caves of Qud
Hyper Light Drifter
I got total war Warhammer a few days ago and am thoroughly enjoying it. Still take breaks with ME3 coop but have been hard pressed at my desk lately so no room for the hotas in a while. Look forward to seeing the changes to ED when I do though. Yeah, lots of great games out in a variety of genres. It's a bit sad SC is nowhere among them.
 
Sure but it wasn't a attack was it? It was a perspective of a public crowd funded game. GORF's post's are well respected because they offer resourced sources, praise to people working on the game and criticism where he thinks fit. You must remember its his opinion and the reason I posted was to show that sa forums are not a total hate thread and that there is a very good analysis of star citizen and why it can be construed as disaster waiting to happen. I am free to have this opinion and share it.



Gorf is talking about gaming. space games? I don't see why you trawled his posting and about what?



so its his opinion. he hasn't posted here. I posted his post because its relevant to star citizen and makes a clear and concise point. In no way do you refer to the points he made at all. Yet you want to show his post he made on another forum, that you feel is important without talking about the post he made that is relevant to this thread?

want even dignify your gif as it refers to your post most poignantly.



yes this is ben. I laughed at the pic with his comments added to them. wont repeat what he said here, but it was his website :eek: In all nothing in your reply has added to the conversation. I posted a quote that adds to the discussion about star citizen. I am sorry if you don't agree with it but this post adds nothing to and I think deflects from what is an reasonable post about the game.

That guy's post are well respect in SA forum alone, guess what so are DSmart posts. It's not a poll of gaming knowledge or constructive criticism for a greater good but only a cesspool of hateful, bitter and resentful people who's only purpose is to laugh at things, guess what they do it about everything if it fits the narrative. That includes elite too lol.
There's nothing good coming from there, there is no though-full thinking there, no objective criticism, just dsmart narrative because ocd kids are easily manipulated.
 
How is my opinion biased?

You've obviously played games before, this rare and arcane knowledge makes you biased against over-hyped broken 5 year old tech demo's.

- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -

That guy's post are well respect in SA forum alone, guess what so are DSmart posts. It's not a poll of gaming knowledge or constructive criticism for a greater good but only a cesspool of hateful, bitter and resentful people who's only purpose is to laugh at things, guess what they do it about everything if it fits the narrative. That includes elite too lol.
There's nothing good coming from there, there is no though-full thinking there, no objective criticism, just dsmart narrative because ocd kids are easily manipulated.

If you want to argue with something someone posted on SA do you really think this is the right place ?.

You should also bear in mind that SA is a self described comedy forum when you complain that they laugh at things. That's pretty much SA's purpose.
 
then feel free to join our thread.

but on another point you can call GORF a Satan but what about the points he makes? Do you disagree with them? Agree with some issues? I don't know you have not referred to the points in the post once. All you have done is ranted about GORF and Derick Smart being hateful etc.
 
Last edited:
Yeah because everyone knows that watching a game equals playing it ;)

Regarding G0RF or any other dsmart gospel preacher, I can't take them serious, I just cant because most of the foundation of their premises are based in blatant lies, extrapolated half-truths AND no game development knowledge.

It's like debating with the kid why things take the time they take. On and On and On. No point.
 
Last edited:
objective criticism

Quite a nonsensical formula, for me. Criticism implies personal opinion, taste and sensibility. Otherwise, an "objective criticism" would only be a simple fact checklist.

Now, for having exeprienced many debates regarding "objective reviews of videogame", I figured that most of the time somebody calling for "objective criticism" can be sumed up as "write what I want to read".
 
Yeah because everyone knows that watching a game equals playing it ;)

Regarding G0RF or any other dsmart gospel preacher, I can't take them serious, I just cant because most of the foundation of their premises are based in blatant lies, extrapolated half-truths AND no game development knowledge.

It's like debating with the kid why things take the time they take. On and On and On. No point.


Then take his post apart with actual reasons. You have offered not 1 reason why you think he is wrong.
 
Last edited:
Yeah because everyone knows that watching a game equals playing it ;)

I agree It's not the same but you can judge many things by watching people play games.
You don't need to fly the ships to see that they behave as if they have no mass.
You don't need to play the game to see that it has practically no content.

You basically want people to buy the game, download 24GBs just so that you have one less excuse to dismiss any critisism?
You're just going to find and cling to something else.
 
It's all about fun & gamebugs until someone gets hurt

[video=youtube;bVmY-McblyY]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bVmY-McblyY[/video]

[video=youtube;SHV5-L3ugrg]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SHV5-L3ugrg[/video]

right?
 
Last edited:
So here we go again, posting random videos without answering any of the issues other posters bring up.
Why is this such a widespread tactic in the SC defense force?
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom