Not sure you win many wars through suicide. Especially when you are only fighting for yourself.
Um, no, ramming someone when it will destroy YOU is not a valid combat tactic.
- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -
Once again, the thing that made it a flaw in the AI is that the Python was also destroyed.
What I'm pointing out is that the AI doesn't break when a reasonable human would break and that pilots need to be aware of it. That's all.
EDIT: Why the @#$@ does everyone assume that when I am trying to warn someone else against making the combat mistake I made (assuming the AI would not ram when it's suicidal to ram) that I am here to complain about it? Fine. I will never attempt to help anyone on the forums again.
Kamikaze tactics were used against warships and were not used in aircraft to aircraft dogfights. They make sense as a desperation tactic back when you didn't have cruise missiles.
It's a stupid tactic in real life for pilot to pilot dogfighting. As I mentioned earlier though NPCs don't care about the cost of destroying their own spacecraft. The NPCs can act as if they are 5 year olds with Daddy's remote controlled ship.
It's still a valid tactic because otherwise just the NPC would be dead. OP was clearly winning the fight, ramming him was the last chance and left the warm feeling that the NPCs death wasn't pointless - he managed to kill his enemy against all odds.