I've had 9 days, 22,000 Ly, and really no productive thoughts on this; a few mistakes, too. The one thing I keep coming back to is the same as the quote above.
Personally what I like with this image is that it has been flipped upside down. No matter how I think about the image above I'm willing to throw out most of it.
- There are three sections to the original Spectogram: Left, Center, Right.
- The Left seems like a clipped imagine from an SRV
- The Right just utterly baffles me
- The Center image is where everyone seems to be caught up
The Center Image:
- The giant circle (to me) appears to be something static
- That is, the shade of color that is the circle appears to be the same shade as the Left and Right images
- All this suggests it is static background information
- I keep thinking of these whenever I look at spectogram image: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grumman_X-29
- Recently I was pretty confident that BluWolve was really on the right track thinking the image was something on the dashboard
- I still thinking there is something to that
The Problems as I see Them:
- None of us have adequately explained even a portion of the center image
- I've gone back through and removed information we might imagine is recognizable or utilitarian
The Anomalous Data:
1. - http://imgur.com/a/LH15d
a. - this creates a very reduced scope of material to base our questions upon.
Image I:
- I have removed the circle
[ Reason ] frequently found on our dashboards and used in mathematics \ leads us to conjecture without evidential basis (as opposed to free-association)
Image 2:
- I have removed the 'mesh' or 'netting'
[ Reason ] found on the top left of our dashboard but our dashboard never has a diagonal line at any time \ leads us to conjecture without evidential basis (as opposed to free-association)
Image 3:
- I have removed the (( from the bottom right
[ Reason ] too many (myself included) imagine this to be a scanner (SRV or Probe signal [in orbit or otherwise]) \ leads us to conjecture without evidential basis (as opposed to free-association)
Image 4:
- removed 'arch' formerly around circle
[ Reason ] several arches appear on the dashboard holograms \ leads us to conjecture without evidential basis (as opposed to free-association)
Image 5 & 5 II:
- removed |-- and --| respectively
[ Reason ] to demonstrate redundancy, are relative only to one another, and align with no other image in any conceivable way \ leads us to conjecture without evidential basis (as opposed to free-association)
Image 6: (title 'frowny face divided by pi' to demonstrate free-association (...)
- removed |-- and --|
[ Reason ] because they serve us no evident purpose \ leads us to conjecture without evidential basis (as opposed to free-association)
Image 7:
- removed everything except -|- and -||
[ Reason ] everything except these is irrelevant to these being different in composition save |-- and --| but we have already been over those; it serves nothing to include them now
Image 8:
DOES NOT lead us to conjecture without evidential basis (as opposed to free-association)
- this information is anomalous as it has no basis within the machinery we operate within the game
- no symbols within the game contain these images
- no real life images exist which contain these images in this way together (in association)
Arguments:
A:
.-. = r
-.- = k
..- = ... no
I'm personally not convinced of the morse code argument here. Any one symbol can have at least 2 outcomes.
B:
If you were going to give someone a message would you want it to kaleidoscope or telescope?
No = Kaleidoscope
[ reason ] It turns into this thread
Yes = Telescope
[ reason ] Every time you make use of the information presented the information returns new data building upon the initial message to present still more data; together this 'unpacks' procedurally into a definite articulate message
IMPORTANT: The evidence of such an articulation would be that when utilized it leads concisely to fresh articulation(s) of meaningful information (the Planck's Constant for example) or a procedure which when undertaken leads to some physical manifestation as say a diagram or jump-point. In short, it leads to something which can be tested.
The methods with which we have so far organized our efforts seem tending toward kaelidoscoping.
- The method of the message itself has here in this post been broken down into 8 increasingly less freely-associable information
- This post does not constitute a correct interpretation of the message, but demonstrates those areas of the message which are prone to radical-irrelevant free-association: if it were radical and relevant it would be 'telescoping'
Please don't hit me with the frozen wet fish, nor the frozen fish, nor any fish!
Last edited:
