UAs, Barnacles and other mysteries Thread 8 - The Canonn

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
AH HAH!!!

BREAKTHROUGH!

This is a preliminary heads up - this isn't finished yet. There is an encoded voice within the transmission. And, when im finished it should be quite clear.

Whats happening here then? First off. the first 1.5 seconds of static are taken as a marker. (Ive chucked everything before that) then Ive divided that into thirds to get 0.5 seconds.

The next bit is the fun part. ORIGINALLY, 7 seconds in corresponded to the centre of the circle. After I split up all the track, I then multitracked it. I shifted the arrow thingy with bar on end to line up with the centre on the left side.

I then shifted the right hand side ((-|| to correspond with the centre. The left side I jacked up 70% in pitch and the Right 30%...

And WALLAH! A voice saying "Help me out of here"

Heres the clean version:

http://i.imgur.com/u7Ay4kB.jpg

Soundcloud link: https://soundcloud.com/user-536207472/letmeout

Naturally im hearing things again eh? What I realized here is that its like a puzzle all mixed up. When you overlay one sample on the other correctly, they reinforce the signal.

Sounds like a big case of Paradolia

- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -

Since I can't plat at the moment, I'll upload some of the other images I've captured. These pattern sometimes follow terrain and other times ignore it entirely. Hopefully someone can clear this up. I'll include the first image I took from ground level, if you look hard enough you'll see the outline of the center of the big laser beam like picture.

This one has something strange looking on top.
http://i.imgur.com/IGsHzud.png

This one is ground lvl of the center of the laser like image
http://i.imgur.com/0H3b9Bk.png

A Square object in a flat area with a small line shooting off
http://i.imgur.com/ryaFfMW.png

Something smaller detailed undernear the crater at top left
http://i.imgur.com/SqLKcJ1.png

No clue but it's distinct
http://i.imgur.com/joXd7Ex.png

That's all I got for now, I'll head back out later when I get a chance. If anyone wants to clean these up id say the first one is the most important, if it has what I think it has shown in it. Thanks for humoring me guys. I really think this is something big. The terrain/contour line theory doesn't stick in my mind with these shapes.
Thats your shadow...
 
I was just playing around with angles. Not to be taken to seriously.:D

I needed two lines to make a 135° angle, like in the first quadrant. It does not matter if I start with a vertical line or not.

I guess the moral of the story is that the image can be anything.

I did four steps that are more plausible than 80% of the theories that are presented here and yet, I got exactly what I wanted. ;)

It really is, that's why I was asking.
It's simple, it makes sense and it's alarming :)
 
Awesome. It's this kind of intrigue that led me into ED. Uber kudos to you guys that are digging in to this, would love to have the time to help out. In the meantime, I may have to take a trip and take a look at a few of these for myself tonight!
 
Last edited:
There is such a deep lesson in that phrase alone!

And despite it being said so many times in so many different ways, there are square pegs still being successfully stuffed into round holes!

Genius.

There's two ways folks are accomplishing that too. Some have round holes so large any peg of any shape will fit (huge meaningless theory), others are carving their pegs down to fit the existing hole (refined theory that ignores non-conforming data).
 
AH HAH!!!

BREAKTHROUGH!

This is a preliminary heads up - this isn't finished yet. There is an encoded voice within the transmission. And, when im finished it should be quite clear.

Whats happening here then? First off. the first 1.5 seconds of static are taken as a marker. (Ive chucked everything before that) then Ive divided that into thirds to get 0.5 seconds.

The next bit is the fun part. ORIGINALLY, 7 seconds in corresponded to the centre of the circle. After I split up all the track, I then multitracked it. I shifted the arrow thingy with bar on end to line up with the centre on the left side.

I then shifted the right hand side ((-|| to correspond with the centre. The left side I jacked up 70% in pitch and the Right 30%...

And WALLAH! A voice saying "Help me out of here"

Heres the clean version:

http://i.imgur.com/u7Ay4kB.jpg

Soundcloud link: https://soundcloud.com/user-536207472/letmeout

Naturally im hearing things again eh? What I realized here is that its like a puzzle all mixed up. When you overlay one sample on the other correctly, they reinforce the signal.





I was checked audio on voices in day of UP was recorded, and heard word "frey". It is make sense after "BARNARD" word find. There is Frey star in bernard's Loop. But I fly around and find nothing except large data survey.
 
...

http://i.imgur.com/u7Ay4kB.jpg

Soundcloud link: https://soundcloud.com/user-536207472/letmeout

Naturally im hearing things again eh? What I realized here is that its like a puzzle all mixed up. When you overlay one sample on the other correctly, they reinforce the signal.

I think you are right that there is a voice. BUT I do not think it is speaking in language we can understand. [woah] I found a similar sounding voice buried in the UA signal, way back last year.

The cut-up technique is very interesting though, and i think you are on to something there.

Makes me think of this gif below: multiple players' scans put together show there are multiple layers to the Probe sound. The shifting layer may be important somehow.

data-anim-hires.gif
 
Last edited:
I think you are right that there is a voice. BUT I do not think it is speaking in language we can understand. [woah] I found a similar sounding voice buried in the UA signal, way back last year.

The cut-up technique is very interesting though, and i think you are on to something there.

Makes me think of this gif below: multiple players' scans put together show there are multiple layers to the Probe sound. The shifting layer may be important somehow.



I'd think the opposite that if we could some how remove the shifting elements and leave the non moving one, we might have a clearer idea of the 'message'.
 
Now that I have been infected with the tinfoil, I would like to offer something to perhaps benefit the research effort:

It seems to me we need to convey all the information and all the theories we have to interested people in a unified, simple and lean format. The thread here is going on and on very fast and it seems to me a lot of information is getting lost here. Lots of posts. This has been suggested and partially done at least by rizal72 and Nagual as far as I have found but they are spread out and not in a unified format.

1- We need a place which offers PURE information and facts, straight up. Simply explain to new people what has been done, what worked and what did not. Kind of like UA Mystery 101.
2- Connected to that, we need a place that offers theories. So we can theorize further, come up with new experiments to try to connect the dots.

This is so we can look at the facts, look at the experiments and the results, positives and negatives, look at the sound graphs, locations, where they stand, everything. All offered in simple format. Not editable by public. Then, below we put forth the theories people have put forward. Like little threads underneath. So maybe you can expand and collapse the theories and try to connect the dots. I think we will get more clues in soon, which we will have to connect so its going to get more complicated by nature. In order to clarify and better convey all the information we currently have in a unified format is highly necessary. The facts and data sheet not editable by public, but people can edit their theories below the facts and data post. Maybe a comments section for each theory. Perhaps it is best to have this source off the frontier forums.

Now I know there are several pages here on the forums that serve this purpose of providing pure facts and data but it seems rather spread out and not unified. A page where people can bookmark and look at what has been experimented, what people theorize, what is going on. Not to discuss, just to get up to date regularly. If such a thing exists, I have not found it, so please point me and other enthusiasts to it. If it does not exists maybe we should work on that first. A clear mind is most necessary to solve a problem in my experience. Seems to me we are all pushing each other to more and more complex ways of thinking than may be necessary. (Its just a gut feeling :D) Sometimes you end up looking for a complex and confusing way of solving a problem and you stop looking in front of you and miss the simple way of solving it. Clarity!

If any effort to produce such a thing gets going, I would like to offer help doing that. Just lemme know and contact me
 
Last edited:
There's two ways folks are accomplishing that too. Some have round holes so large any peg of any shape will fit (huge meaningless theory), others are carving their pegs down to fit the existing hole (refined theory that ignores non-conforming data).

You forget to mention the third option:

Okay - I'm officially shocked. Star Trek meets Rihanna??? And she has clothes on!!!

[video=youtube;BXhIT4MpRis]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BXhIT4MpRis[/video]

I was alluding to the fact that some people take a sledgehammer to it all...

And this was what I was looking for...
[video=youtube_share;OJWJE0x7T4Q]https://youtu.be/OJWJE0x7T4Q[/video]
 
There's two ways folks are accomplishing that too. Some have round holes so large any peg of any shape will fit (huge meaningless theory), others are carving their pegs down to fit the existing hole (refined theory that ignores non-conforming data).

Anything fits through a gaping hole in logic :D
 
Just as an interesting titbit.

The "apparent" voices come only from this section - and interestingly the perceived "Words" line up perfectly with the more concentrated sound areas. Is there a scientific explanation for this in this frequency band?
Only curious.

QUoWXLf.jpg
 
Now that I have been infected with the tinfoil, I would like to offer something to perhaps benefit the research effort:

It seems to me we need to convey all the information and all the theories we have to interested people in a unified, simple and lean format. The thread here is going on and on very fast and it seems to me a lot of information is getting lost here. Lots of posts. This has been suggested and partially done at least by rizal72 and Nagual as far as I have found but they are spread out and not in a unified format.

1- We need a place which offers PURE information and facts, straight up. Simply explain to new people what has been done, what worked and what did not. Kind of like UA Mystery 101.
2- Connected to that, we need a place that offers theories. So we can theorize further, come up with new experiments to try to connect the dots.

This is so we can look at the facts, look at the experiments and the results, positives and negatives, look at the sound graphs, locations, where they stand, everything. All offered in simple format. Not editable by public. Then, below we put forth the theories people have put forward. Like little threads underneath. So maybe you can expand and collapse the theories and try to connect the dots. I think we will get more clues in soon, which we will have to connect so its going to get more complicated by nature. In order to clarify and better convey all the information we currently have in a unified format is highly necessary. The facts and data sheet not editable by public, but people can edit their theories below the facts and data post. Maybe a comments section for each theory. Perhaps it is best to have this source off the frontier forums.

Now I know there are several pages here on the forums that serve this purpose of providing pure facts and data but it seems rather spread out and not unified. A page where people can bookmark and look at what has been experimented, what people theorize, what is going on. Not to discuss, just to get up to date regularly. If such a thing exists, I have not found it, so please point me and other enthusiasts to it. If it does not exists maybe we should work on that first. A clear mind is most necessary to solve a problem in my experience. Seems to me we are all pushing each other to more and more complex ways of thinking than may be necessary. (Its just a gut feeling :D) Sometimes you end up looking for a complex and confusing way of solving a problem and you stop looking in front of you and miss the simple way of solving it. Clarity!

If any effort to produce such a thing gets going, I would like to offer help doing that. Just lemme know and contact me

How about taking a look at the first posts in this thread ;-)
 
Just as an interesting titbit.

The "apparent" voices come only from this section - and interestingly the perceived "Words" line up perfectly with the more concentrated sound areas. Is there a scientific explanation for this in this frequency band?
Only curious.

Yes, sort of. Those frequency ranges are in the human speech range so any modulated signal in those ranges will encourage interpretation as 'voice' since our brains are wired to convert signals in those ranges to interpreted message. Some more than others.

I say 'sort of' because of course any actual voice recording would be in those ranges so the presence of signal there could obviously be real voice. But it's very unlikely since it's so vague as to be open to interpretation, it's not really possible to clean it up and the resulting 'messages' don't convey any meaning. Now if 60% of the people heard "map is centered on Merope5c" that would be different.

I've posted that lower section "things" in previous thread, bot no one seems to be interested... I try again this time

It's not a lack of interest, it's a lack of signal. I've personally spent a lot of time trying to clean that section up. In terms of audio content it's noise and in terms of pictographic content it's the equivalent of seeing a cheeto in the shape of Jim Morrison's head. That's not to say there's nothing there but if the only posts we have are 'is there something there' I'll come down on the side of 'no'. If somebody posts an actual something then great.
 
Last edited:

I see (from left to right) a monkey playing with symbols, a camel, and a unicorn's head.

And now that I have suggested them, you see them too!!! [yesnod]
 
Last edited:
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom