UAs, Barnacles and other mysteries Thread 8 - The Canonn

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Not so re: Miackce. As far as I'm aware Miackce was just a staging ground for the remnants of the attacking Thargoid fleet (and location of Thargoid missions in earlier games), their actual homeworld (probably in another galaxy) is unknown...lots of speculation regarding the LMC etc, but nothing certain.

Miackce was a home world, but probably not the original, main home world. That's correct.

It's the only real Thargoid world seen in any of the games, but I'm not sure it's lore anymore.
 
Sorry if this has been reported already.
Yesterday I found a new Barnacle site on HIP 17225 A 1:
https://forums.frontier.co.uk/showt...nonn/page388?p=4314527&viewfull=1#post4314527

Today I logged back in to this:
aK0RqIy.jpg


As you can see from the coordinates, the base is close to one of the other Barnacle sites on A 1.

Just to give you an overview:
oO8WyCK.jpg
 
Last edited:
Sorry if this has been reported already.
Yesterday I found a new Barnacle site on HIP 17225 A 1:
https://forums.frontier.co.uk/showt...nonn/page388?p=4314527&viewfull=1#post4314527

Today I logged back in to this:
http://i.imgur.com/aK0RqIy.jpg

As you can see from the coordinates, the base is close to one of the other Barnacle sites on A 1.

Just to give you an overview:
http://i.imgur.com/oO8WyCK.jpg
Strange, you thought the feds would have built the base around a barnacle site? that way you don't have to drive down there, plus you can have the base turrets act as barnacle defence...
 
Last edited:
I just found that you can scan the barnacle points with the data link scanner on the SRV and it yields a "Barnacle Scan data package" credit reward. Any idea where we can hand that in?
 
The frustration seems to be mounting. If you know your alternate histories, you'll remember that it took quite a long time for the answer "42" to come to light and the question hadn't even been discerned yet. I'm still struggling to figure it out to this day. In the absence of any kind of progress, vitriol has seeped in.
A bunch of "scientists", whose methods have yet to lay out any kind of concrete path to an answer, are now resorting to arguing over which of their methods is deemed appropriate. None of these methods is correct. You are all trying to slay the dragon. You can't see the dragon. You don't know it's weaknesses. You don't even speak its language. It's burning your houses down while you hurl heavy boulders into its empty cave.
The correct and only method could lead you nowhere. This method requires data that either catches you unaware or doesn't exist yet. These "theories" are merely conjecture. The only respectable HYPOTHESIS (not scientific theory!) based on concrete data is that the UP is pointing to Merope 5C for an unknown reason. The spectrogram is a secondary set of data that is unreliable and a waste of time at this very moment. If you want to tout your scientific theories, you must first perform the necessary steps in the scientific method.
We must all unify our efforts. It's fairly simple:
1. Prioritize our efforts based on reliability of CURRENT data.
2. Perform research in the field.
3. Report findings.
4. Hypothesize (if possible)
5. Test hypothesis
6. If results of testing confirm or strengthen hypothesis, RECORD the results and start back at one with the new data and direction in mind. If testing does not back up the hypothesis, start back at one with original data.
7. Have patience.

They may be difficult and hard-won, but the mysteries of the universe are only as such because they have been weaving their intricate riddles for billions of years. Who are we to stoop to guessing and conjecture. Have a little more respect for science before you float the word out there like a pink balloon.

difficult and hard won eh? First off. We went on a wild goose chase because of you. We gave you the benefit of the doubt. We arrived and there was NOTHING to show for it. If you intend to pique the interest of this forum, you must be on the ball, and provide evidence. And not spout a load of       when you don't do what you ask for yourself.

- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -

difficult and hard won eh? First off. We went on a wild goose chase because of you. We gave you the benefit of the doubt. We arrived and there was NOTHING to show for it. If you intend to pique the interest of this forum, you must be on the ball, and provide evidence. And not spout a load of       when you don't do what you ask for yourself.

Make no mistake - we have all done it. And learned from it. Theres a certain etiquette to follow these days.
 
To all the skeptics,

What would I, or anyone else who believes what I am saying, need to show you to help you believe these images (in the sky and on the ground) are actually there? Short of MB coming in here and saying they're there.

Do you want the UP image broken down and explained from our standpoint?
Do you want images with and without Merope 5's light for comparison?
Do you want video (hard for me to do because I have a noisy toddler).
Perhaps time lapse?
Or is there no convincing at this point in time?

Please help us out here. I'm 100% convinced this is what we're supposed to find. The Merope system was designed to show us something. It's too much of a coincidence in my opinion.

Math is not my strong suit so I personally can't prove it from that standpoint. Perhaps if we approached this from the realm of archaeology and astronomy for a bit we'd solve it.


This goes out to everybody who says -Listen to my idea! I need you to do the work because I don't know how!

If you don't have the skills or the time or the equipment, how did you become so sure that this was the right answer? You just told us that you don't have what it takes to figure it out!


- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -

Sorry if this has been reported already.
Yesterday I found a new Barnacle site on HIP 17225 A 1:
https://forums.frontier.co.uk/showt...nonn/page388?p=4314527&viewfull=1#post4314527

Today I logged back in to this:
http://i.imgur.com/aK0RqIy.jpg

As you can see from the coordinates, the base is close to one of the other Barnacle sites on A 1.

Just to give you an overview:
http://i.imgur.com/oO8WyCK.jpg

And not even over the Thursday BGS downtime!
Frontier needs to add a new type of NPC ship- a big cargo hauler the size of a capship that they can park over the planet for a day or two before they add huge installations. Would add some plausibility.
 
'Was', eh? ;)


So we're not even sure that Raxxla was Thargoid-related? Just that it was 'Alien' within its legend?

Interesting and fun to know, thanks! :)

Raxxla is more than thargoid related.this planet supposedly had a gateway to the thargoid homeworld aswell as other galaxys and othe unkown treasures and alien races. It is nor myth or legend it is a complete mystery and gets cropped up over and over.

It was asked ages ago was raxxla in elite dangerous, braben avoided the question. Raxxla is in drews books that have significant bearing on the whole rift story.

It has never been found and been told as a myth yes but remember the thargoids themselves are also taught to be a myth but kahina and salome want to expose the truth.

Until proving false nothing can be stated as false
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom