UAs, Barnacles and other mysteries Thread 8 - The Canonn

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Sorry, could you please explain me what is this PI line? I'm afraid I've missed this part.

In the diagram, the line that extends from the centre to the edge of the egg / circle. It's presence could simply mean this isn't an egg shape, it's a circle. PI being directly related to circles.
 
I feel a bit silly to ask that.

So, when I tried to create the spectogram myself from the UP EMP signal, I got a distorted signal. Just like these: http://i.imgur.com/kfrTCpk.png
I assumed that someone more skilled than I had "corrected" the image to create the almost perfect circle we are using for our tinfoil hatting.

But just now I had an small illumination: What if this deformation of the signal was intentional? Maybe we made a mistake by correcting it to make an almost perfect circle?

Yes, I feel very silly for asking this. But sometimes the silliest questions may have some truth hidden, right?


Hm, maybe we did it the wrong way around? Maybe the upper part is out of scale, and it is a circle but seen from a perspective? Kind of like the radar/hud in the ships?
What is bringing me to this idea is the diagonal lines on the far left/far right that kind of look like scratch marks.
Maybe they should be all horizontal?
 
Last edited:
In the diagram, the line that extends from the centre to the edge of the egg / circle. It's presence could simply mean this isn't an egg shape, it's a circle. PI being directly related to circles.

yep, and that would be part of the universal language

I have been trying something else out with that 45 degree line (Well, not quite 45 degrees on the alien image, maybe a little distorted ?) but no idea if I am right or on the right track and it could just be a reference to a circle and nothing more
 
Last edited:
In the diagram, the line that extends from the centre to the edge of the egg / circle. It's presence could simply mean this isn't an egg shape, it's a circle. PI being directly related to circles.

Oh, I see. It doesn't make sense that it is relevant just because the radius of a circumference are related 2 PI times if it is not a circle, and that line doesn't actually say anything. If there is any reason why it could be a circumference, I'd say that it is because changing the scale to logarithmic makes all lines straight (not only the radius).

The grid, the center, are more factible to be used as references to identify the picture as a circle. A line from the center? that is just confusing.

Thanks for the explanation, I had already missed it anyway, never expected to even have a name :)
 
Last edited:
If they did then they didn't post it so it's not much to go on.

I was kinda intersted in how they got an 'Angry' sound out of it in the first place. They didn't say how in the stream.

- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -

If they did then they didn't post it so it's not much to go on.

Netslayer and Myself tried to reproduce the angry sound in the same location 5 times, We both think it was some kind of bug, I'l ask Net if he can post it up to the thread.

Ahh kk, didnt see this post until now.
 
Sorry, could you please explain me what is this PI line? I'm afraid I've missed this part.

He's talking about the 3,142 interpratation for the 4 pictograms.
Anyway I'm not convinced about both main interpratations: both the binary and the Pi ones, still have some flaws.

There's no need of Pi, to make a circle from the drawing.
Pi depicted with human numbers does not attract me too much.
The two top glyphs are different from the bottom's, whatever anyone can say about it. They are.

What I think is that we are still missing their real meaning.

The only one explaination that I'm still keeping, not because it's mine :D, is the good correlation between the hi/low purrs in the UP transmission, and the four glyphs on the drawing.
The reason why I LIKE it so much, is that it does not need any numbers or human conventions at all, assuming the glyphs being just PLACEHOLDERS for the four quadrants, and each triplet in the transmission recalling one of the glyphs, and then one of the quadrants. What we can do with a sequence of quadrants is still unknown.

Anyway, also this theory is far from being perfect. Very far. Too much.
 
Now that I am home for a couple days, I have the time to say this, about the UP spawning in Ross 47.

When I spotted the UP Convoy for the first time, I was there to get Qwent's access. I was running missions in Sirius area.
I still think they are there because Sirius Corporation is fully involved in the UP and UA mystery.

BUT

1) what if FD decided to put the UP convoys around all the Engineers locations, cause they are aware people are always around them?
That's why they set the spawn rate that low, assuming someone sooner or later would check those filty threat 4 convoys showing around in those areas...

I had always assumed that system controlled by major faction was the only way they could define where signal sources spawn
Just thought about it a bit and they are able to define areas where signal sources spawn, the UA shell is an example of that
 
Last edited:

Ozric

Volunteer Moderator
I was kinda intersted in how they got an 'Angry' sound out of it in the first place. They didn't say how in the stream.

It wasn't mentioned much in the stream because, as Starbeaver intimated earlier, it had only been heard the once the night before and they weren't sure about it.
 
He's talking about the 3,142 interpratation for the 4 pictograms.

Wow, if we are still considering 3 1 4 2 as something important I'd just back off and wait for a total refresh.

To get from those symbols to Pi we had to fake a binary interpretation of the glyphs that lacks of rationale and reorder the numbers in a random way to make it match with a rounded version of a 'universal' number that we call PI..

That is fine, I just don't buy it.
 
He's talking about the 3,142 interpratation for the 4 pictograms.
Anyway I'm not convinced about both main interpratations: both the binary and the Pi ones, still have some flaws.

There's no need of Pi, to make a circle from the drawing.
Pi depicted with human numbers does not attract me too much.
The two top glyphs are different from the bottom's, whatever anyone can say about it. They are.

What I think is that we are still missing their real meaning.

The only one explaination that I'm still keeping, not because it's mine :D, is the good correlation between the hi/low purrs in the UP transmission, and the four glyphs on the drawing.
The reason why I LIKE it so much, is that it does not need any numbers or human conventions at all, assuming the glyphs being just PLACEHOLDERS for the four quadrants, and each triplet in the transmission recalling one of the glyphs, and then one of the quadrants. What we can do with a sequence of quadrants is still unknown.

Anyway, also this theory is far from being perfect. Very far. Too much.

PI isn't a number though. We as humans give PI a value, a description based on our language. No matter where you are in the world in any language if you understand the maths behind it you can recognise it. It doesn't matter what it's called. It's a universal constant. I'm not referring to the glyphs at all, I think they could be something different, unrelated to PI or perhaps not.

EDIT:

From a pure game play point of view, can you imagine the amount of arguments over "its an egg" "no it's a circle" ?
 
Last edited:
I was kinda intersted in how they got an 'Angry' sound out of it in the first place. They didn't say how in the stream.

- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -





Ahh kk, didnt see this post until now.

I cannot remember what they said exactly... and too late for me to check the vid :p

did they say something about being in a hot system when it happened ?? but anyway, they also think it may have been a bug.... so I think however it happened, it needs to be duplicated, then tried in similar circumstances in a similar system

and on top of that recordings need to be taken and then analyzed to see if they are changes in the Alien Transmission
 
Wow, if we are still considering 3 1 4 2 as something important I'd just back off and wait for a total refresh.

To get from those symbols to Pi we had to fake a binary interpretation of the glyphs that lacks of rationale and reorder the numbers in a random way to make it match with a rounded version of a 'universal' number that we call PI..

That is fine, I just don't buy it.

I suspect someone is still doing it :D
Not me, however.

PI isn't a number though. We as humans give PI a value, a description based on our language. No matter where you are in the world in any language if you understand the maths behind it you can recognise it. It doesn't matter what it's called. It's a universal constant. I'm not referring to the glyphs at all, I think they could be something different, unrelated to PI or perhaps not.

I see. Thanks.
 
PI isn't a number though. We as humans give PI a value, a description based on our language. No matter where you are in the world in any language if you understand the maths behind it you can recognise it. It doesn't matter what it's called. It's a universal constant.


^ This
 
PI isn't a number though. We as humans give PI a value, a description based on our language. No matter where you are in the world in any language if you understand the maths behind it you can recognise it. It doesn't matter what it's called. It's a universal constant. I'm not referring to the glyphs at all, I think they could be something different, unrelated to PI or perhaps not.

EDIT:

From a pure game play point of view, can you imagine the amount of arguments over "its an egg" "no it's a circle" ?

I still think the image needs a logarithmic scale, but if you are not talking about the glyphs, than I don't get why did you mention PI. There is a circumference, therefore there is PI, and Radius, and Centre, and Area, and.. then, why did you put any relevance in PI I wonder, just because there is a random line in the drawing? Clearly the inner grid is a good reference to consider the image as a circle, this is why I got lost on the PI reference then.
 
Just a question from a UA newby.
I have been following the UA's and now UP's discussions for a while. With the latest image from the UP in mind a question came up.
On the voyager the disc contains the image containing information on our counting system but also our location in the universe.
Our location was displayed in relation to pulsars. The idea was that a pulsar can be seen from a great distance and will be the same from all sides. A pulsar acts like a lighthouse in the galaxy. To my knowledge pulsars are not found in ED.

If the UP image contains some location, the aliens must have embedded some reference points that should be visible (maybe in the galaxy map). Did anyone try to find such reference points in the image?

P.S. I cannot actively participate in the search for UP's yet since I am just coming back from a long journey to the other side of the galaxy. I am docked at Jacques station at the moment.
 
What is the consensus on the encoding (?) of the low frequency "tuba" sounds, in particular the fact that no more than two consecutive "0" or "1" are ever seen? As far as I can tell, neither Manchester coding nor biphase mark coding seems to fit.
 
Hmm, looking at the incursion into pleiades sector infographic (Awesome stuff btw)

All the outposts seem to be evenly spaced, apart from inbetween Epsilon and Zeta. It looks like there would be one inbetween those two outposts. If the outposts relate to the 'alpha' / 'beta' testing sites referred to by the convoys, it may be worth investigating systems around the midpoint of Epsilon and Zeta outposts (or the 1/4 way from Zeta to alpha, as Epsilon seems not quite to preserve the spacing). I'll wander down there later and look about, but without a UP unfortunately.
 
Last edited:
I still think the image needs a logarithmic scale, but if you are not talking about the glyphs, than I don't get why did you mention PI. There is a circumference, therefore there is PI, and Radius, and Centre, and Area, and.. then, why did you put any relevance in PI I wonder, just because there is a random line in the drawing? Clearly the inner grid is a good reference to consider the image as a circle, this is why I got lost on the PI reference then.

I understand why you're confused, I'm probably not explaining it well. It may simply be a way of clearly showing it should be a circle, and to make sure you adjust the spectograph to be logarithmic to see it properly.
 
If the UP image contains some location, the aliens must have embedded some reference points that should be visible (maybe in the galaxy map). Did anyone try to find such reference points in the image?

Just to begin with.. who said it was aliens?

You start with this: "if the UP image contains locations" - Uncomfirmed - and therefore - undetermined -

Can I ask how could anyone "try to find such reference points in the image", if you start with an IF???
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom