I dunno if this is supposed to refer to me or not, but I have yet to kill another player, period. I certainly wouldn't grief sidewinder commanders in a corvette.
Wasn't referring to you.
I dunno if this is supposed to refer to me or not, but I have yet to kill another player, period. I certainly wouldn't grief sidewinder commanders in a corvette.
Blockade the station. Interdiction any one you see in sc and cargo scan them.
Quite. Have the processes been automated yet? As I recall, the devs took a load of stations offline at the same time. Irens Dock in Manite was UA-bombed, but not a thing happened for well over a month, when the devs seemingly decided to take a look at which stations had been bombed, then had to disable about twenty at once
Manual mechanic is a terrible mechanic.
I think I need to go to hospital. My sodium levels are too high.
1) Assuming you manage to exist in the same instance as anyone bringing in UAs.
2) Some of us have jobs and lives, and can't afford to sit in front of a station 24/7.
Blockade the station. Interdiction any one you see in sc and cargo scan them.
lets all be honest, this is now basicly Eve with better ship handling, the eve guys have won, congrats.
lets all be honest, this is now basicly Eve with better ship handling, the eve guys have won, congrats.
What would be trolly would be for a player group to bomb Jacques again....or even...Danielle's Progresd
That applies well to if's. When it is a risk, some take the gamble. This is a guarantee. You will be shut down. That isn't greed. That's a market that wouldn't be functioning anyway.
so even the mods now acknowledge that the N+1 meta is the way to win ED now. okay.
Time to make things a little more lighthearted before people start accusing each other of being real life terrorists, or where ever else dark this line of conversation usually ends.
https://i.imgflip.com/196vvy.jpg
That's a pretty solid way of looking at it. Fair play.On a fundamental level, is there a difference from delivery UA that cause an effect on the system, and attacking System Authority ships and traders to cause a lockdown?
Both can be countered by in game actions.
Seems to be playing the BGS to me, weak sauce or not.
Just as Sothis is playing the background sim by getting allied to a faction that needs to pay a premium in credits for your services due to the distances provided, and encouraging missions by pushing the factions into boom.
Well that's good news (at least in my opinion), although it completely contradicts what Michael Brookes said at LaveCon :/
That's a pretty solid way of looking at it. Fair play.
That implies, though, that everyone is playing the BGS all the time, and also supports the claim that it's far easier to be disruptive in this game than it is to be constructive, given the number of player-hours that are seemingly required to address actions like UA-bombing
Time to make things a little more lighthearted before people start accusing each other of being real life terrorists, or where ever else dark this line of conversation usually ends.
https://i.imgflip.com/196vvy.jpg
what is the n+1 meta?