Special Treatment & Favouritism?

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
We can agree to disagree. :) No, I feel giving basic decals in CGs is favoritism when every should get those. I take the risks like everyone else that signs up for a power. But for the father, nothing?
There are CGs handing out decals? Then anyone can join and get one if they participate can't they?

How a about a "Decalls for All" CG. Every tier releases a decall to be used for anyone. 8 Tiers, so 8 possible unlockable decalls which after that are free to use to anyone.

Communism baby yeah!
 
I am quite surprised about the level of nastiness, vitriol and personal thrashing I'm recieving. Its rather revealing.

You rather set the tone in your original post, I'm afraid. Maybe if you had couched in the language of neutrality or positivism, instead of having a go at FD for doing something nice for people and knocking people and organisations who have done a lot for the community it would be different.

"Hey, wouldn't it be great if FD expanded their group decals to a wider audience? Wouldn't that be cool? What can we do to help this along? Maybe if we got some of those sewn patches done for ourselves?"

How hard would that have been?

As it was, it was incredibly negative and bitter, as well as resentful. You also revealed that you had already had a chat about FD about it in confidence but because the official answer was not one you liked, you are bringing it to the mob. That is not cool, either.

Then you asked us what we thought of it. Some people have said it was negative and bitter. That's not a personal kicking; that's fair response. You've thrown some poop on the floor and asked us what poop smells like. We say 'poop' and you admonish us for using the word 'poop'.
 
Hu? Who is that then? How is this decided? I know lots of people who've put a tremendous amount of time and energy into the game but they don't appear on Frontier's list of approved gamers.
Obviously, FDev makes that decision. That you know people who put a tremendous amount of time and energy into the game, isn't the determining factor of anything, ever.

I'd ask for everyone to be treated equally and fairly, for the game to be run and managed for the benefit of all players and for Frontier to stop being biased and showing special treatment. I really find it hard to understand why thats such an objectionable position.:S

It's objectionable because you are asking FDev to drop their idea of fair in favour of yours. 'Treated equally' is objectionable because it supposes we are all the same, all putting the same effort in to the same things. We aren't now, and never will be. The criteria for recognition & rewards should be decided by FDev, not by your pseudo-communist sentiment.

I've had 4 beers and 2 scotches and I'm completely not replying to this thread.

You know you want to... it's practically the weekend...
 
Last edited:
I understand the OPs position, I can see how this thread might go downhill but it's worth considering that it's only the same as any other industry. There will always be "preferred" customers who get special treatment. That may be in the form of entertainment perks or rebate deals. It doesn't reflect t on your custom just that from a sales perspective some things make sense.

It would be nice to have the option to decal my ship more to reflect achievements and alliegences but in all fairness I change my flags so often it would become a chore for me personally. I think I would like a better Piracy mechanic first.
 
No doubt. In case I wasn't clear my point isn't about decals but its rather more about how Frontier have certain favourites and how this affects their planning for the game and the direction this takes. If they are dishing out special rewards, and lets not forget the triple AAA group fiasco, then there is most certainly a thinking behind it. With such an obvious show of approval how can they possibly not be biased in their decisions re the game and the design choices they make?

Hu? Who is that then? How is this decided? I know lots of people who've put a tremendous amount of time and energy into the game but they don't appear on Frontier's list of approved gamers.

I'd ask for everyone to be treated equally and fairly, for the game to be run and managed for the benefit of all players and for Frontier to stop being biased and showing special treatment. I really find it hard to understand why thats such an objectionable position.:S And, well I've just never seen this sort of thing before in any online game.

Well obviously the decision is made by FDev internally and that is up to them how.
It's not a question of favouritism, FDev are trying to include as many groups as possible.

How do you suggest that every player is treated equally? I don't object to what you are saying, I just don't see how you propose this could work?
Can you provide a specific example of where someone has been left out of an opportunity to be included?
 
There are CGs handing out decals? Then anyone can join and get one if they participate can't they?

How a about a "Decalls for All" CG. Every tier releases a decall to be used for anyone. 8 Tiers, so 8 possible unlockable decalls which after that are free to use to anyone.

Communism baby yeah!
LOL @Shar. But Ziggy remember that CG that only made the huge weapons available to those that participated in it? Guess what changed FDs mind when they said the decision was FINAL? Whining, and the OP is not whining here.
 
Ah, decals, such a dissapointing topic. I really don't mind that they do decals for some groups doing something cool like distant world, Fuelrats and whatnot. What does bother me is that they only make those exclusive decals and don't do any decals for a normal peasant like me. Last time they did that was the ones on the Cobra Onienhead Paintjob and that was a long time ago.

A bit of love for commoners here and there couldn't hurt, I'm even willing to pay for it and I don't think I'm the only one.
 
But the OP isn't just talking about decals though.
I 100% don't like it at all. It gives those in receipt the impression that they have some kind of ownership of game elements to the detriment of everyone else. Which is a distinct impression I get from some threads.
We all paid to play and some shelled out a lot more than others I might add.
 
So I've noticed that Frontier have quietly implemented group decals for a handful of groups who took part in their 'dangerous games'. Whilst I don't begrudge anyone a bespoke group decal this strikes me as being completely unfair to everyone else. You know, all the other players and groups. I spoke to Zac a while back about my concerns and whilst it was great of him to spend the time to talk to me about it I wasn't really convinced by his defence of this sort of thing

I've long suspected Frontier have their favourites but now they are actively showing it. Arbitrarily giving special treatment and favours to certain people/groups is something I have never seen from a developer anywhere else. Ultimately my largest concern here isn't about a few cosmetics but how this will naturally affect their choices when it comes to the planning of the game.

There is a history of this too: Triple AAA groups, Special decals for the distant worlds crew, a station named after a well known youtuber, a special little sidewinder for lave radio and so on (what about radio sidewinder?). Not trying to point the finger at anyone in particular, just showing some examples. Whilst its a nice gesture for those on the reciving end its not so good for everyone else because if you aren't buddying up with Frontier, or doing what they approve of, you don't get these special rewards. And in all likelyhood you won't be getting the game god modded in your favour either, or have a harrassment policy implemented just for your special group... In all my years of gaming I've never seen a company be so blatantly biased and openly exhibit signs of favouritism. I'm not green with envy either before anyone suggests it, its the principle that matters.

But hey, why not just do something wonderful for the game and community and we might also become a new favourite or have a special reward? We shouldn't have to. Who gets to decide whats worthy anyway? Do we really want to be bending over backwards to gain favour with the company and is this how it all should work? Surely, we should all be equal in game and be equally important to Frontier as customers and backers. Sadly we really don't seem to be. This affects everyone.

Whether its by design, or unwittingly a result of being enthusiastic, I find this to be grossly unfair and when it comes to the dangerous games I get the impression Frontier were engaged in gerrymandering.

I wonder if I have this wrong? Perhaps this is all a bit of harmless enthusiasm from Frontier. Curious to know what everyone else thinks..

All I can say to this is

Come up with a way the ED community can interact with the game in a beneficial way, eg distant worlds, waldo's fish CG, etc etc etc and maybe you'll be the one getting the special decal.
Me? very early on I asked for a bubble wide war to destroy the empire and all I got was shot down at Lugh. [sad]

Bill

"remember the 47th Squadron!"
 
There are CGs handing out decals? Then anyone can join and get one if they participate can't they?

How a about a "Decalls for All" CG. Every tier releases a decall to be used for anyone. 8 Tiers, so 8 possible unlockable decalls which after that are free to use to anyone.

Communism baby yeah!

You think OP will be happy with a Tier1, when others are getting Tier8? 'Fairness' thread incoming...
 
Can you name me another developer/game who does this?

Yes. Bethesda / Zenimax handed out achievement badges for people that took part in certain Quake Live tournaments and for one competition they put the names of all the clans that took part on a plaque in an obscure part of a new map they released. I know this, cos we were one of those clans, and while it was a meaningless gesture in some ways it still gives me a warm feeling :)

Giving out trinkets as rewards for participating in group events seems laudable to me. You refer to other 'special' treatment that some players are getting which sounds like a different matter - I'd be interested in seeing your evidence.
 
Didn't Mojang also give capes in Minecraft to a few select individuals, like Cpt. Sparkles, because of their YouTube status?
 
I really don't think giving some groups something here and there is the problem, the reason it becomes a problem for many is that they only do that. If they would do some decals available for everybody here and there I don't think anybody would care about what certain groups are getting.

People tend to get a bit y when they all the time see others getting stuff without getting something for themselfs, throw them a bone here and there and most will be happy.
 
I really don't think giving some groups something here and there is the problem, the reason it becomes a problem for many is that they only do that. If they would do some decals available for everybody here and there I don't think anybody would care about what certain groups are getting.

People tend to get a bit y when they all the time see others getting stuff without getting something for themselfs, throw them a bone here and there and most will be happy.
Thanks you. lol
 
I really don't think giving some groups something here and there is the problem, the reason it becomes a problem for many is that they only do that. If they would do some decals available for everybody here and there I don't think anybody would care about what certain groups are getting.

But there are already Decals for everybody, surely?
There are our wings, and there are occasional things like Pax decals, which anyone can click on a web page in order to get.
And 'everybody' could even get one of the existing 'group' decals *by joining the group*.
If it hurts so much that the Fuel Rats have a decal, maybe join the Fuel Rats?
 
Personally speaking the decals don't bother me at all but some of the other points concerning group influence do. The direction of the game both in the here and now and the short and long term future should not in my opinion be overly influenced by x,y or z group(s).

Over saturation of game focus in terms of story direction, CG's, Galnet and more in relation to groups needs to be carefully monitored. There are certain groups in the Elite sphere that seem to have way too much game focus and limelight in my opinion, to the extent that certain elements of the community feel somewhat excluded both in terms of focus and gameplay elements. If these groups were just having their '15 minutes of fame' as it were then no problem, but it is more than that, it seems to be a constant focus that is overly influencing Elite Dangerous the game and carrying the favour of the developers.
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom