From the last set of pictures, with two active obelisks, I have a few questions commander.
What mode were you in? Solo?
What have you done on the site? What were you carrying in your SRV cargo hold?
Alien archeology and other mysteries: Thread 9 - The Canonn
- Thread starter Ian Phillips
- Start date
- Status
From the last set of pictures, with two active obelisks, I have a few questions commander.
What mode were you in? Solo?
What have you done on the site? What were you carrying in your SRV cargo hold?
Nothing will, because the system doesn't start with AO UX A78 ... It is likely Col Sector AO-UX A-78, or something like that. So we need a way to search for systems that contain 78 at the end and work backwards from there. EDSM.net doesn't seem to support that type of searching. How do we accomplish this?
Nothing special that i can recall of. I was just driving through them very, very slowly and looking around with the dev cam. Cargohold was empty and it was in Open. They where definitely powered off and became active as i approached them. Also, i noticed, that they where pulsing in an...well, lets say, interesting rythm. But i guess they where just activated time-delayed, so it was the normal pulse. Also it's intriguing, that they where not showing the pattern, until i came really close. I could (and have) targeted them a few meters before.
Btw, all four beacons where "off", but extended. Unfortunately i couldn't make any more shots, since i was blown out of my ASP straight back into the bubble...
Ah some griefer then, sorry to hear that....hm, it's more and more obvious that we have to be in PG or OPEN to be able to activate more than one obelisk simultaneously.
Anyone else notice 6 + 4 + 9 = the number of sattelites in the diagram (3 + 1 + 4 + 5 + 6)
Typing this in won't work ... it only search based on what the system starts with, and these won't be the starting characters. You need to search for systems that end in 78 and work backwards, but i don't know how to do that.
Last edited:
Mmmh. Maybe something has to be drawn inside the star symbol. If so, the lower section will get less point, the asteroid belt became something else and maybe the nonogramm get only one solution
I don`t think so. In star we have 2 or 3 variants and all are bad. In 6th planet we can draw gliph too. With bad luck anywhere.
Last edited:
That's not how the Procedural Identification system works. It's (Sector Name) (Letter)(Letter)-(Letter) (Letter)(Number)-(Number). The numbers can contain more than one digit and may or may not be separated by a dash(so it's not a-78, but rather A7-8 or A78). Unfortunately that string has too many letters in it.
I spent my entire lunch today playing around with that bottom corner of the nonogram, and I came up with nothing. Even with the various solutions for the asteroid belt, the bottom still makes no sense to me, and every solution I come up with for it looks like garbage.
I feel like it almost has to be a hint for where the system actually is, but how it conveys that information is what I can’t figure out. We almost need to know the HOW before we figure out the WHAT.
I feel like it almost has to be a hint for where the system actually is, but how it conveys that information is what I can’t figure out. We almost need to know the HOW before we figure out the WHAT.
I downloaded all the system with "-78" in the names from EDSM using the API (all 10,821 of them).
The only systems containing the strings "UX" and "-78" are:
{ name: 'Eok Flyuae UX-L d7-78' }
{ name: 'Smootau UX-L d7-78' }
{ name: 'Phua Scrua UX-L d7-788' }
{ name: 'Lysoof UX-L c7-78' }
{ name: 'Blua Eaec UX-A c1-78' }
{ name: 'Puekea UX-L d7-7853' }
{ name: 'Sifi UX-U d2-78' }
{ name: 'Smootau UX-L d7-78' }
{ name: 'Phua Scrua UX-L d7-788' }
{ name: 'Lysoof UX-L c7-78' }
{ name: 'Blua Eaec UX-A c1-78' }
{ name: 'Puekea UX-L d7-7853' }
{ name: 'Sifi UX-U d2-78' }
None with UX and A78.
None with UX and A7-8
Last edited:
Nothing can be inside the star without invalidating the top part of the nonogram.
What if the other co-ordinates are centred on Lave and Eravate.
I already say it`s bad.
20+ Solutions. And If we have one or more dots inside star we broke asteroid field.
Last edited:
- Status