I tested the eyeX about two years back, and it's shocking to see how "innacurate" the eyes are.
The device and it tracking was brilliant. Our gaze just isn't what we believe it is. We did a paper on it. Change me life's perspective somewhat.
I've been in two minds whether to take the plunge as sort of a poorMans VR.
So the 4C with head-tracking has my attention.
The only issues is that any Tracking system, the screen does not move with the head.
Meaning head moved, eyes remained focus on the screen.
Eye tracking at least followed a native glance, it would be interesting to see how both head and eye tracking combine.
Well I will say it feels quite natural. Mainly because it is so close to how it would work in real life (although clearly not quite the same).
So when you turn your head right the viewport shifts right, but you find yourself looking back to the screen with your eyes.
I think the key is having the headtracking sensitive enough so you're not straining your eyes so much.
The issue I'm finding is looking up, The 4C does not seem to be able to track too well when I look up, for up it seems to be relying almost exclusively on eye tracking to "get there".
Left, right and down work great however. Are others seeing this?
Last edited: