maybe if you dived that coordinate in half you get one that could work. then it would be Synuefe ZL-J d10-119: (~61,25,~-117)
Maybe... Why divide by 2 and not subtract 90?
maybe if you dived that coordinate in half you get one that could work. then it would be Synuefe ZL-J d10-119: (~61,25,~-117)
So it's a matter of identifying the moons path (been trying to find a more mathematical/precise way to do that) and accounting for a certain offset to allow for the proper angle. In other words 2 parallel lines to check on a candidate system. Offset by a certain amount of KM of the path of the moons orbit on both sides of it. If it rises and sets in the same direction than we only need to check one path
.
Yes, if we could figure the orbital path of the moons over their parent bodies, we might be able to narrow down the search for further ruins in the remaining systems to a single path.
MIGHT.
I'm not even sure atm if all the systems have planets with moons...
Commanders, kindly direct your attention over here...
http://i.imgur.com/LhAYBXl.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/8bLbPy6.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/YSrX6IT.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/laPl9KJ.jpg
IC 2391 SECTOR GW-V B2-4 B 1
LAT -29.10
LONG -30.51
Right, me job's doneI'm having a pesky migraine, so excuse me if I'm not available for questioning. Also it's my birthday today, so kind of a neat present for me, no?
Have fun!
I just woke up to see this, WELL DONE COMMANDER! At least we finally know that there are in fact more ruins out there, I'm still greatly disappointed that it took brute force searching with eyeballs to find it though.
Wait, is the layout exactly like the original ruins? That wouldn't make sense, it's on a different planet....??? :S
Can we get some Quality Answers here?
I just checked. They have absolutly Nothing in Common.
http://imgur.com/a/wyohw
Wait, is the layout exactly like the original ruins? That wouldn't make sense, it's on a different planet....??? :S
Well this is good, since it lowers the planet search down even more. We can also exclude tidally locked planets with tidally locked moons if the ruins are consistent.
Anyone got a pic of where the moon rises from in relation to the ruins? is it directly opposite from where it sets....?
Am I an idiot for asking this question?
Update:
I spelt 'pic' like this: 'pick' which is stupid. So that answers the second question.
What about the body position in the system, i.e. Xth planet on the Yth sun with moon etc .. those details.
Layout makes sense. Identical wear & tear doesn't.I just woke up to see this, WELL DONE COMMANDER! At least we finally know that there are in fact more ruins out there, I'm still greatly disappointed that it took brute force searching with eyeballs to find it though.
Wait, is the layout exactly like the original ruins? That wouldn't make sense, it's on a different planet....??? :S
Indeed. They may look the same but are they oriented the same, or different, do they all point towards somewhere etc etcEdit: Its actually a good thing that the Ruins are Identical and the Planets totally different. Eliminates a Lot of Theories and Narrows the Research-Field down.
I bring this quote back up just to remind you, and everyone else, that my moon obsession started here, with cmdr edards question.
He started it [yesnod]
I think Ive come up with something that might work. What i was thinking since friday is that the circle in the top represents a top down view of the planet and the circle in the bottom represents the side of the planet. I suspect the relic and orbs to triangulate in such a way with something to give us the coordinates were searching for. because both of these objects are place like the planets orientation on the galactic map.
Here is a image for my explanation.
on the top circle I first thought the zero reference(aka the yellow line in my drawing) to be the axis of movement. however that is for my new theory incorrect and the blue line is this axis of movement for the planet. If i measure the angle between this blue line and the relic. then i get a angle of ~ 31. assuming that the stripes in the ruins mean the area from which the sunlight comes this should then be - ~-31. It also tells us that this side is the negative side.
Looking at the bottom circle the orbs represent the the coordinates on the side. Triangulate the red line with the orb which represents the planet were searching for. then we get a angle of ~29. not knowing what could tell us this side is the negative side but knowing that the new ruins are on the negative side, we can assume this is the negative side.
Also I now think that the pyramid close to the relic represents that there is a moon close to the planet were the ruins are on. For the one in the middle in the top circle which then should be Synuefe XO-P c22-17. The pyramid could tell us that the planet were searching for orbits around a other one and the other 2 are lonely planets without moons.
Ofc the one who pinpointed the objects on that map could have put them slightly in the wrong place.
Then applying this theory to the other planets we get:
Synuefe XO-P c22-17: (~-2,~91)
Synuefe ZL-J d10-119: (~122.5,~-117)
IC 2391 Sector ZE-A d101: (~-12,~5)
of course this theory could be as much as the one next guy. But lets give it a shot!
Well done Commander Zorbaq! [yesnod]...and a very happy birthday to you![alien][up]
Layout makes sense. Identical wear & tear doesn't.