Alien archeology and other mysteries: Thread 9 - The Canonn

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Is/Can somebody make a new map with designated numbers next to the obelisks so we can enter information in a sheet. Found 3 now but am a noob with photo editing
 
I used the solo combos at the new site. I got the same data you would expect from Site 1 (or A or whatever we are calling it). That worries me. Hopefully more testing will sort things out.
thats in line with my test yesterday, where I with a fresh start in solo combed site 1, moved to site 2, used same artefact/obelisc pattern and did get zero new messages...
 
You're right, BUT: Who declares the 0° Meridian? It is a discretionary human decision, other races will come to a different one.

On a tidally locked planet the point closest to the body being orbited would be a logical choice. Or they could just declare the ruins site to be zero :)
 
I suspect they're all meant to be different and it was a bug.

What a massive relief though that they're not all the same - still seriously shoddy QA/testing but at least it's progress and a sign the effort was put in

I do not agree.

IMHO, it's not a bug at all.
There are different instances of the same sites around, to raise the chances to find them.

What I mean is: there are 3 unique different layouts to find, but there are different instances of them scattered around the area.
 
So it is now clear there is one site per system. Interesting design change. Still would like answers as to the second sites duplication from FD though as clearly an issue.

The games afoot!
 
I do not agree.

IMHO, it's not a bug at all.
There are different instances of the same sites around, to raise the chances to find them.

What I mean is: there are 3 unique different layouts to find, but there are different instances of them scattered around the area.

That's possible, but back to being rather shoddy and odd with just four potential sites to look at. I'd rather believe they put in the effort but failed at QA.... after all look at the QA on the rest of it, can't say it's outside the realms of possibility
 
So it is now clear there is one site per system. Interesting design change. Still would like answers as to the second sites duplication from FD though as clearly an issue.

The games afoot!

i was shouted down when i said 4 systems 4 sites ( and one site in each system) glad i have been proven right, a told you so is in order
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom