Alien archeology and other mysteries: Thread 9 - The Canonn

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
We know that the Guardians shared DNA & RNA. We are told they were skilled genetic manipulators

I've long been waiting for the devs to shift into the realm of genetics for their puzzles...

Could it be that the strings and tokens form (part of) a genetic description? The concepts of 'start' 'separator' and 'end block' look startingly similar. Plus you wouldn't expect to find loops.

The genetic code contains 4 'letters'. Add start, separator and end - and you have 7 components....

Having said that, I've no idea where one would go next with attempting to render it into something comprehensible.

Well there are 5 nucleobases (if we count uracil as well)... take out the seperator, we would have 6... the end block is kind of like the 8th token but I don't consider it as a token, since it ONLY appears at the end.

I did entertain the idea of it being a genetic code, however since two tokens can not appear after one another, I do not think this is feasible (in DNA and RNA two or more of the same nucleobases in succession is a very common thing)
 
Last edited:
I mean if I was desperately trying to keep my 'hypothesis' going by continuously coming up with random co-ords (like you) then i'd at least try and find it myself before being proven wrong over and over again.

But that's just me, you just want everyone else to listen to you and follow your (wrong) 'hypothesis' [wacky]

30/30, 30/60 - yeah, I should have been 100% accurate with a hypothesis, I'm so, so, sorry!

I don't care at this stage :D

I've called it that Planet 1 in Synuefe ZL-J d10-119 is the next ruins and planet D 2 is the other one in Synuefe XO-P c22-17.

Won't be "wrong" this time.
 
ive gotten 22 data scans so far from the new site, i got 4 as soon as i came out of glide before i even found the ruins, and alot more when i went afk for about 10 mins so i cant help with where i got what, but there will probably be 32 data entries to find at this site in total.

history - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 (8-16 at site 1)
culture - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 (7-13 at site 1)
language - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 (8-14 at site 1)
biological - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 (7-12 at site 1)
technological - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 (7-13 at site 1)

Culture 6 is missing on the sheet.
Language 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 are missing too.

Can you please update it ? Thank you.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ovrDiY9WZw4SXaSMe13tODwHQdEnxLoVIj4ceGrpGQ8/edit#gid=2003437149

Here is the post I update from the datas you, guys, provided on the Google Sheet : http://elite-dangerous.fr/forum/evenements-globaux/13648-ram-tah-ruines-alien?start=360#191182

All the datas, ordered and translated in french.

Good job Cmdrs !
 
Last edited:
30/30, 30/60 - yeah, I should have been 100% accurate with a hypothesis, I'm so, so, sorry!

I don't care at this stage :D

I've called it that Planet 1 in Synuefe ZL-J d10-119 is the next ruins and planet D 2 is the other one in Synuefe XO-P c22-17.

Won't be "wrong" this time.

So how does the -31.7877, -128.9711 at site 1 fit your new 30/60/90...120? (Hint: it doesn't - just back away from the theory slowly or it will blow up in your face - again :) )
 
Congratulations CMDR Khenistry.

I've been working on a spreadsheet to calculate the moon orbit around the planet, then take the relevant offset on the planetary surface (allowing for the orbital inclincation of the moon track) and converting that back to lat and long arcs on the planets surface.

Moon Tracker

This seems to work for both D11-102 (alpha) and B2-4 (beta) (certainly within the tolerances of spotting the moon by eye over the mounds) but I cannot find a match for the location of the new site at D101 (gamma).

Likely reasons, in order of probability:

A) My mathematics may be very wrong (and ugly - good god don't look at it!)
B) The new site has moon-rise / moon-set markers, but they are at a different relative angle to each other
C) The new site does not have moon-rise / moon-set markers at all
D) The whole moon-associative thing is a fluke (but I consider unlikely for even two sites match as well as they do purely by chance, hence dislike this option)


o7

That is very cool. I'll compare this to the results I'm seeing from my JavaScript that I got from moveable type
 
30/30, 30/60 - yeah, I should have been 100% accurate with a hypothesis, I'm so, so, sorry!

I don't care at this stage :D

I've called it that Planet 1 in Synuefe ZL-J d10-119 is the next ruins and planet D 2 is the other one in Synuefe XO-P c22-17.

Won't be "wrong" this time.

Your 'hypothesis' doesn't even include 30/30! [haha][squeeeee] I mean come on man you got no idea! Give it up!

Yeah they probably will be on those planets, doesn't mean you'll get any credit unless you actually find it yourself.
 
30/30, 30/60 - yeah, I should have been 100% accurate with a hypothesis, I'm so, so, sorry!

I don't care at this stage :D

I've called it that Planet 1 in Synuefe ZL-J d10-119 is the next ruins and planet D 2 is the other one in Synuefe XO-P c22-17.

Won't be "wrong" this time.
actually, my gut tells me that Synuefe ZL-J d10-119 14b fits much better - its a moon of a Y-Type star and tidally locked to it, the gas-giantSynuefe ZL-J d10-119 15 (binary with the Y-Type is in a nearly perpendicular arrangement orbitwise and could be seen as a moon. A wee could though with 133K but nothing a technically advance species couldnt handle....
I´ll give that one a shot rather that the binaries 1&2 which are pure molten metal and beyond the 1000K mark...
 
Your 'hypothesis' doesn't even include 30/30! [haha][squeeeee] I mean come on man you got no idea! Give it up!

Yeah they probably will be on those planets, doesn't mean you'll get any credit unless you actually find it yourself.

No, but any pilot would be foolish not to deviate from the 32/64/128 to check out surrounding areas. I'm not seeking credit, I just want the ruins found like everyone else - it is just a shame the numbers are so close, yet so far.

I mean, it's not like Frontier would intentionally make sure they don't all share the same co-ordinates so it isn't so obvious, right?

Meh.

- - - Updated - - -

I´ll give that one a shot rather that the binaries 1&2 which are pure molten metal and beyond the 1000K mark...

It won't be 1000k though, on the dark side of that tidally-locked planet.
 
No, but any pilot would be foolish not to deviate from the 32/64/128 to check out surrounding areas. I'm not seeking credit, I just want the ruins found like everyone else - it is just a shame the numbers are so close, yet so far.

I mean, it's not like Frontier would intentionally make sure they don't all share the same co-ordinates so it isn't so obvious, right?

Meh.

You're nowhere near these co-ords with your guesses? Have you actually read your annoying diagram you kept flooding the thread with? All your guesses were 32 lat 64 lon etc, never did you guess 32 lat 32 lon or any variation of that.

But if you're still standing strong, go to those co-ords you posted earlier about whatever planet you're 'calling' and prove us wrong, otherwise, let it go and admit your theory holds no merit.
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom