Common render bug - it might vanish on a relog
Yeah, that fixed it. Darn.
Common render bug - it might vanish on a relog
We know that the Guardians shared DNA & RNA. We are told they were skilled genetic manipulators
I've long been waiting for the devs to shift into the realm of genetics for their puzzles...
Could it be that the strings and tokens form (part of) a genetic description? The concepts of 'start' 'separator' and 'end block' look startingly similar. Plus you wouldn't expect to find loops.
The genetic code contains 4 'letters'. Add start, separator and end - and you have 7 components....
Having said that, I've no idea where one would go next with attempting to render it into something comprehensible.
I mean if I was desperately trying to keep my 'hypothesis' going by continuously coming up with random co-ords (like you) then i'd at least try and find it myself before being proven wrong over and over again.
But that's just me, you just want everyone else to listen to you and follow your (wrong) 'hypothesis' [wacky]
So... which spreadsheet are we using to cumulate data?
I'm getting a bit confused. Everyone seems to be going about this new site in different ways.
ive gotten 22 data scans so far from the new site, i got 4 as soon as i came out of glide before i even found the ruins, and alot more when i went afk for about 10 mins so i cant help with where i got what, but there will probably be 32 data entries to find at this site in total.
history - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 (8-16 at site 1)
culture - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 (7-13 at site 1)
language - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 (8-14 at site 1)
biological - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 (7-12 at site 1)
technological - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 (7-13 at site 1)
30/30, 30/60 - yeah, I should have been 100% accurate with a hypothesis, I'm so, so, sorry!
I don't care at this stage
I've called it that Planet 1 in Synuefe ZL-J d10-119 is the next ruins and planet D 2 is the other one in Synuefe XO-P c22-17.
Won't be "wrong" this time.
This one - adding the lore at present. Maps on the front page, not sure if we're collection locations anywhere yet (things move fast!).
Congratulations CMDR Khenistry.
I've been working on a spreadsheet to calculate the moon orbit around the planet, then take the relevant offset on the planetary surface (allowing for the orbital inclincation of the moon track) and converting that back to lat and long arcs on the planets surface.
Moon Tracker
This seems to work for both D11-102 (alpha) and B2-4 (beta) (certainly within the tolerances of spotting the moon by eye over the mounds) but I cannot find a match for the location of the new site at D101 (gamma).
Likely reasons, in order of probability:
A) My mathematics may be very wrong (and ugly - good god don't look at it!)
B) The new site has moon-rise / moon-set markers, but they are at a different relative angle to each other
C) The new site does not have moon-rise / moon-set markers at all
D) The whole moon-associative thing is a fluke (but I consider unlikely for even two sites match as well as they do purely by chance, hence dislike this option)
o7
30/30, 30/60 - yeah, I should have been 100% accurate with a hypothesis, I'm so, so, sorry!
I don't care at this stage
I've called it that Planet 1 in Synuefe ZL-J d10-119 is the next ruins and planet D 2 is the other one in Synuefe XO-P c22-17.
Won't be "wrong" this time.
Beautiful ruins. I found a shipwreck a little to the north. Can't explore more until tonight, but I thought this was a nice view of them from afar.
Hmm. May need to reinstate the Ram Tah mission with a quick trip to Meene before I begin the scanning![]()
actually, my gut tells me that Synuefe ZL-J d10-119 14b fits much better - its a moon of a Y-Type star and tidally locked to it, the gas-giantSynuefe ZL-J d10-119 15 (binary with the Y-Type is in a nearly perpendicular arrangement orbitwise and could be seen as a moon. A wee could though with 133K but nothing a technically advance species couldnt handle....30/30, 30/60 - yeah, I should have been 100% accurate with a hypothesis, I'm so, so, sorry!
I don't care at this stage
I've called it that Planet 1 in Synuefe ZL-J d10-119 is the next ruins and planet D 2 is the other one in Synuefe XO-P c22-17.
Won't be "wrong" this time.
Your 'hypothesis' doesn't even include 30/30! [haha][squeeeee] I mean come on man you got no idea! Give it up!
Yeah they probably will be on those planets, doesn't mean you'll get any credit unless you actually find it yourself.
I´ll give that one a shot rather that the binaries 1&2 which are pure molten metal and beyond the 1000K mark...
*EDIT* and i´m going one step further...
https://community.elitedangerous.com/en/galnet/uid/588b1f3d9657ba131799dc90
this article lets me think that there is more to it than the obvious.
No, but any pilot would be foolish not to deviate from the 32/64/128 to check out surrounding areas. I'm not seeking credit, I just want the ruins found like everyone else - it is just a shame the numbers are so close, yet so far.
I mean, it's not like Frontier would intentionally make sure they don't all share the same co-ordinates so it isn't so obvious, right?
Meh.
I do wonder why the station services loading icon is so similar to the obelisk patterns.