I blame my Autism :/
I try and watch what I write as to not offend or come off as an arrogant s.o.b online, but it is a struggle
. I try not to give up getting my points across.
Alien archeology and other mysteries: Thread 9 - The Canonn
- Thread starter Ian Phillips
- Start date
- Status
I blame my Autism :/
I try and watch what I write as to not offend or come off as an arrogant s.o.b online, but it is a struggle
. I try not to give up getting my points across.So is there a new or updated spreadsheet for the obelisk data?
Pleased explain why?
The 3rd discovered site actually sounds more like the "alpha" site as it seems we are getting stuff that makes some of the info from the 1st discovered site make sense.
A tinfoil hat isn't any good here the rays still get though - I'm wearing a good solid metal colander instead. First discovered site was a test site that FD didn't expect to be found and was to be removed before the puzzle went live (and it should have always been on the planet where the 2nd found site is - (hence why it is the same and that there are only four beacons ) but couldn't remove it after it had been discovered.
I'm not taking this hat (colander) off for anyone though - you're not stealing my thoughts....
A tinfoil hat isn't any good here the rays still get though - I'm wearing a good solid metal colander instead. First discovered site was a test site that FD didn't expect to be found and was to be removed before the puzzle went live (and it should have always been on the planet where the 2nd found site is - (hence why it is the same and that there are only four beacons ) but couldn't remove it after it had been discovered.
I'm not taking this hat (colander) off for anyone though - you're not stealing my thoughts....
I'm still not convinced that my maths is correct. Plotting my JavaScript version gives lines across the moon path which don't appear to be normals to the direction. I'm looking into it and once I've corrected it I'll change the spreadsheet to match.
I was kind of hoping that angles were angles and that the radius of the planet wouldn't be involved in the calculations (where the mounds have fixed angular differences) - is that not the case?
o7
I was kind of hoping that angles were angles and that the radius of the planet wouldn't be involved in the calculations (where the mounds have fixed angular differences) - is that not the case?
o7
I blame my Autism :/
I try and watch what I write as to not offend or come off as an arrogant s.o.b online, but it is a struggle
Next time you go to type any iteration of "I told you so", don't. Would be a giant leap in the right direction.
That is my thought as well.
Sorry, wasn't aware I insinuated that :/
Aside from the new biology data etc, that came out today
but that was in [based on] another thread (here) where I received just as much criticism and got nailed on a cross by some in the forums.
Last edited:
Not a bad theory, except there is no evidence that FD tested the ruins before putting them live
Last edited:
SO what gives with site 3 not having any Artefacts in the place holders?
In Solo mode, and there nothing at all, even my radar is dead silent
In Solo mode, and there nothing at all, even my radar is dead silent
Since the circles of the ruin don't scale in size as the planet does. There has to be a relative size. That's where the radius comes in such that an observer at the center sees the moon rise and set at the circles. The larger the planet... the further from the orbit the ruin has to be to make that work
One of the more reasonable explanations!
Still shoddy AF but all the parts do fit.
Not a bad theory, except there is no evidence that FD tested the ruins before putting them live
Never said they tested it
Is there any particular reason SYNUEFE XO-P C22-17 AB 3 isn't being considered for possible ruin location? Been cruising it for awhile and it seems to fit the MO
Masheikh Scytale
Banned
Sorry, wasn't aware I insinuated that :/
Aside from the new biology data etc, that came out today
Keep doing that good work !
Is there a speadsheet with known combos for third ruins?
I can see only 4 combos here
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet...3tODwHQdEnxLoVIj4ceGrpGQ8/edit#gid=1144069221
I can see only 4 combos here
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet...3tODwHQdEnxLoVIj4ceGrpGQ8/edit#gid=1144069221
Last edited:
Looking at the orbital lines of the D2 right now. Problem is that these two bodies - D2 and D3 are tidally locked to each other. Not to the star, because D2 does not have an orbit around its star. Therefore IMO the only place where the ruin can be is directly beneath the moon.
- Status