When implementing new features / fixing existing mechanics, should they listen to me or the others?
Just curious!
Just curious!
How about listening to the people they pay for designing games, who may have done it for years, and who are probably better at it than (rough estimate) 99.995% of the forum cattle? Wouldn't that have been a grand option?
How about listening to the people they pay for designing games, who may have done it for years, and who are probably better at it than (rough estimate) 99.995% of the forum cattle? Wouldn't that have been a grand option?
How about listening to the people they pay for designing games, who may have done it for years, and who are probably better at it than (rough estimate) 99.995% of the forum cattle? Wouldn't that have been a grand option?
For those who vote for the others, I consider your vote to be for me.
Lol you really think the designers of the "game" are that awesome don't you? Despite the fact some aspects of the game look like they were developed by someone who has never even played a game before, let alone made one. I wonder which awesome mind came up with say... the copypasta alien ruins? Such skillz...
Weird poll...
IMHO they'd be best off when they listen to both, right?
Umm you forget an option......"them"
No way, 63% already voted for meI think they should employ me and then listen to my feedback on quality control and community engagement![]()