Oh dear, I think I voted in that one too. [haha]
New flash: If a bug was reported in a Beta, and the product was released with that bug still in it...then, by definition: THE BUG WAS ABSOLUTELY IGNORED.
There is literally no other logical way to interpret this. Anything else is pure white knighting that makes me wonder what your per word rate happens to be and where I can sign up. I can be positive in exchange for cash, too. I promise I absolutely wouldnt rat out the whole system. No, really.
I see lots of comments regarding "missed opportunities" by FDev.
But don't you think that if they could have done things another way they would?
Maybe it is just down to the game design limitations and available staff/time
We might be asking for the impossible?
I see lots of comments regarding "missed opportunities" by FDev.
But don't you think that if they could have done things another way they would?
Maybe it is just down to the game design limitations and available staff/time
We might be asking for the impossible?
I'm not a developer (or even a beta tester), but I was aware of the bugs pre release that made it into live - mostly from Reddit, with many users expressing surprise that it was going live, with concern that it most definitely wasn't ready for release.Possible that the report was...missed? idunno. Yea, probably just ignored.
Blackcompany said:New flash: If a bug was reported in a Beta, and the product was released with that bug still in it...then, by definition: THE BUG WAS ABSOLUTELY IGNORED.
Ah, that's why so <unknown quantity> players had issues either playing (frequent disconnects) / logging into the game / using the maps... when it was dropped just before a 4 day bank holiday, because there were no game breaking bugs. Just as well we had the offline... oh wait!Not quite true, actually. YOU assume they've been ignored. However, it is quite possible, even likely, for some bugs to be detected and reported and still make it to live if not considered by the Devs (the Devs, not players) to be game breaking, even perhaps too complicated to resolve by the release window (unless game breaking). Perhaps there are insufficient resources to remediating all bugs in time and if not game breaking simply slated for a subsequent bug fix post-release. Perhaps further investigation of the bug is needed. I don't know about anyone else but I don't think I've ever come across a completely bug-free game, regardless of alpha and beta testing.
Having been away a while and just read the OP why am I still not surprised to see the exact same posts..... AGAIN..... on the FDev forums. The OP's post was written within the first month of game release 2 and a half years ago. It's been written again and agian and again and again - no doubt by players that saw the misleading ad on youtube, bought it, played it, found it utterly boring and came onto thew forums to find out what's going on.
I guess there was some upset with 2.3 patch. Oh look, just like many of us were saying before the BETA test was nothing but a ripoff cash grab. I'm assuming by some of tjhe comments that the "beta test" wasn't actually a beta and as usual, FDev pushed out yet another bug ridden patch, just like ALL the ones preceeding it and then they get left and not addressed.
That's been the constant theme with this game's development history. Broken gameplay, shallow gameplay. Even ex-employees of the company have criticised the "upper management" for being blinkered or not listening and that's is massively apparent to anyone paying attention.
As you the BGS - yes! What DOES it do? It's hailed as this amazing "thing" but really, it's a load of old rubbish. Nobody cares about it as it does pretty much nothing towards making the game any more enjoyable.
This is the game. This will always be the game so I'd suggest that maybe everyone should stop playing the game for a week in protest and contact FDev letting them know when it's going to happen because I'm sure that will get their attention.
They haven't listened in 2.5 years so I'd throw away that hope you've been clinging onto because it's obvious this is never going to be the game we were all told it would be in the DDF which is sad![]()
This is the game. This will always be the game … They haven't listened in 2.5 years so I'd throw away that hope you've been clinging onto because it's obvious this is never going to be the game we were all told it would be in the DDF which is sad![]()
Not quite true, actually. YOU assume they've been ignored. However, it is quite possible, even likely, for some bugs to be detected and reported and still make it to live if not considered by the Devs (the Devs, not players) to be game breaking, even perhaps too complicated to resolve by the release window (unless game breaking). Perhaps there are insufficient resources to remediating all bugs in time and if not game breaking simply slated for a subsequent bug fix post-release. Perhaps further investigation of the bug is needed. I don't know about anyone else but I don't think I've ever come across a completely bug-free game, regardless of alpha and beta testing.
Asyoufor the BGS - yes! What DOES it do? It's hailed as this amazing "thing" but really, it's a load of old rubbish. Nobody cares about it
These posts get posted over and over, I've posted more than a few myself. I'm a broken record, I agree on your overall point OP.
To sum up, I'd rather the next patches (or even notification that future patches will be) focused on depth to things like combat, exploration, mining and trading. Depth not "features" is what the game needs IMO.
Imagine how much better multicrew would have been if the last few years had been spent on adding depth to those main 4 things listed. The reason multicrew falls so short (and don't get me wrong, I do enjoy it for a quick blast, I'm not a hater) is because there's just very little depth to any of those careers in the first place.
Well, you weren't kidding. You keep using that word like it means anything. It doesn't carry any meaning because it can mean literally anything we want it to mean. Be specific and describe what you're talking about, please; it's just as bad as the word "gameplay" and doesn't add anything to discuss: http://insomnia.ac/commentary/gameplay/
I totally understand your point of view. And Elite was always "developed" like this. I remember when I heard "Release in December" when we were in Beta 2. This was a bugfest par excellence, but hey - it worked somehow - thanks to the community that developed workarounds, tutorials, ingame tools and so on. But now we are close to 30 months in market - this means that I can expect a product that has an acceptable quality. And 2.3 doesnt even slightly meet the lowest criterias of having quality. From a studio like Frontier I expect improvement of quality and not the opposite - especially after the 7th major update in the product lifecycle.
Well, you weren't kidding. You keep using that word like it means anything. It doesn't carry any meaning because it can mean literally anything we want it to mean. Be specific and describe what you're talking about, please; it's just as bad as the word "gameplay" and doesn't add anything to discuss: http://insomnia.ac/commentary/gameplay/
Could you explain how it is you still don't know what depth means when it's been explained to you over and over and over again? Do you have issues remembering stuff or are you selective with your information gathering so you can keep up this tired old whine "but what does depth mean!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
It's boring, you've been here long enough to know better as this subject has come up hundreds of times, quite literally. How is it YOU haven't managed to learn it and why should WE tell you again? If the first 100 times wasn't getting through then just give it up - you're never going to get it.
Very well put.
The most devastatingly frustrating point in all this is that the game does have so much potential that is either not recognised or is completely ignored by the design team.