Sorry I dont agree with you. I know its hard to deal with.
I would be fine if these 3rd party site died.
I would be fine if these 3rd party site died.
This post is quite funny and revealing. I'm a young'in and I don't even use the Galmap. I suspect '84'ers' can't survive without someone giving them directions.
Remove the API from the public... and FDEV can create their own cut down versions.
Don't be held to ransom again.
Engineers weren't even up to date on Inara for awhile now.
I thought all of these tools were supposed to be 'unnecessary'. Funny how removing them is seen as disruptive isn't it?
No!
A last ditch effort at what, trying to change FD's stance? Once again FD have always said they have no intention of creating and supporting a full API. They did not originally like the idea of an API at all because of the level of support it would require from them.
So what happened?
People created 3rd party apps anyway, sometimes even when they had expressly been told to stop development, and now because FD's stance has not changed they are encouraging people to show their dissent to FD to demonstrate how much leverage they believe they have over FD.
I helped Thrudd out a reasonable amount during Beta and after the game had been released. I occasionally use EDDiscovey for old FGE times. I, however, do not agree at all with this. Yes I can imagine they're frustrated that things have not changed, but to be fair, I'm not sure why any of them expected anything else. And using the community as leverage to try and change that does not sit well with me.
I am also still waiting for anyone to answer this.
Just a question to all those supporting this action. Where exactly would you like this to sit in the priority. You know all the complaining that's been done about the development of Elite recently, you now all suddenly want that to be put on the back burner so that resources can be diverted to talking to some 3rd party developers? I would be interested to hear from the said developers (especially the OP) to see how high a priority they think this should take, over the development of the game?
If you don't play the game, then why are you still here?
Due to lack of information and dialogue from FDev.
Honest answer, I don't know, but hijacking the Salome event and using the community as a pawn in a 'look at me, look at me, I want, I want' crusade stinks to high heaven in my book.
I feel a disturbance in force... as if 1,000,000 Sat-Nav's were all unaccessible.....
While these 3rd Party 'add-ons' to the game make Elite as simple as all other games™ to placate the attention span of the modern gamer, and yes, they are very useful if you can't be bothered to do any research (as you had too in all previous versions of the game) at the end of the Day these 'mods' are 3rd Party no-one (to my knowledge) asked for them. Individuals have taken it upon themselves to 'hack' into a game and create something additional to the game.
While I do agree, in part, that the latest incarnation of Elite should have included some kind of limited trading oojamaflip, along with a gadget for planning your next build/ship etc etc. I don't think that we should be able to just scan the whole galaxy for the best trade routes. If you're honest with yourselves, all these trade calculators really are, are minor exploits so that you never make a loss while transporting goods.
To those of you that are now lost in the Galaxy, or now feel that the game is unplayable - Reach for your pen & paper. Now you too can emulate the original players of the game
While it is a shame that the support for 3rd party addons seems to fluctuate over time. It seems to be an issue that other 3rd party mod devs also have (World of tanks is a prime example. after each update the game is vanilla for several Days until they fix their code - but conversely that game is in my opinion far better while the mods are inactive).
What is required is for the FDevs to make a statement, one way or the other, and make their opinion clear as to whether they will support these 'tools' that a lot of the community appear to rely on.
I wouldn't be surprised of they are finally making/updating their own decent working trade companion which would ultimately make this whole conversation moot.
Sorry, but I don't condone strikes of any kind. Update your site's or don't. You have found people that now rely on you and have withdrawn your support (for your stated reasons). Does that make you better or worse than the FDevs that you are complaining about?
I ultimately always rely on my own info, and have my own working spreadsheet. In other words "I'm alright jack". do whatever you want I'll still keep playing
While I wish you luck, although I think you could have found a better way of trying to obtain your goals.
Posted by someone using a third party pilots license signature, and using a stolen image as an avatar.
Sorry I dont agree with you. I know its hard to deal with.
I would be fine if these 3rd party site died.
To be fair, that's not really how I read it. What they want is a bit of notice for a breaking change, and timely feedback on bug reports so that they know if / when it might be fixed. The developers of these tools are working with a set of moving goalposts with no knowledge of when those goalposts will move or where they'll move to. I completely stand behind them on that.Probably nothing. I know how much work you put in personally, which is why this situation pulls me in 2 directions. I think part of the problem is that the perceived need by FD to develop some of the tools in game disappeared as the community rose up to make them. Now the issue is some of them want a dedicated contact in FD just for them to make what changes they want, when they want them. There's no way that is going to happen.
That doesn't make any sense - you don't support wjhat they're doing, so in other words, if you had the pwoer to stop them you would but it's their website and they can only do what they want because I lack the power to stop them?
Yes and the people saying they don't support their action (not that it's anyone's business btw) are simply wrong.
1) it's nobody's buisness but the owners what they do.
2) if you're against them shutting their site down you're against them having free choice on their product.
So if you had the pwoer, would you stop them from shutting it down? I'm assuming you are going to say YES as you're against their actions?