#support3rdparty - Why we temporarily shut down our sites.

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Ok, so FD have committed now its the 3rd Party Tools too.

So you the developers can now promise that if FD commit, you will commit that these sites and tools will continue to be developed till the end of Elites development ( 7 more years going by DB ).

No leaving the tools, when a new game comes out that you move to play.
You commit to the player base that these tools will stay online line and bugs and new features will be added while Elite is still running.


Let see if you commit too the users of your 3rd party tools.

You seem to misunderstand. FD did not commit to the 3PDs because they owe them anything, they did it because their *customers* made it clear that they were very likely to step away from this game (and very likely would have long ago) if these sites didn't exist. FD knows this, they're not blind or stupid. At the end of the day, for them, it's about money. That's not cynicism, that' reality. For the 3PD's, however, what they do is *purely* a labour of love, and thus they have no incentive or reason to promise anything to anyone. Do they want people to enjoy their sites and thus the game? OF COURSE, otherwise these tools wouldn't exist. Do they have any responsibility to promise these sites will live forever? Sorry, 'fraid not.
 
If only everyone in the real world could come together in such complete solidarity.. Nevertheless despite our differing views of the game we are united for once. Those evil developers lol..

To whoever maintains ED Engineers.. o7
 
Last edited:
I agree with all this, +rep. I think it's fair to say that the third party devs have undoubtedly added to Frontier's bottom line over the last few years, that's almost undeniable. Simply asking for consideration when making code changes is not extortion (as Ed himself said). It is in fact a community spirited desire to keep changing as Frontier change and to keep things great for the rest of us. Well done 3rd party devs and well done Frontier for handling this well and acknowledging the work these people are doing. Let's remember folks, calling people who work for free extortionists.... really isn't cool..

Oh, and could it have been handled a better way? Who knows... but let's think about the future not the past as both sides now seem intent to do.

Extortionists are, as extortionist do. - Mrs. Gump
 
I agree with all this, +rep. I think it's fair to say that the third party devs have undoubtedly added to Frontier's bottom line over the last few years, that's almost undeniable. Simply asking for consideration when making code changes is not extortion (as Ed himself said). It is in fact a community spirited desire to keep changing as Frontier change and to keep things great for the rest of us. Well done 3rd party devs and well done Frontier for handling this well and acknowledging the work these people are doing. Let's remember folks, calling people who work for free extortionists.... really isn't cool..

Oh, and could it have been handled a better way? Who knows... but let's think about the future not the past as both sides now seem intent to do.
Well said.

I say we sticky Ed's response, Genar's response to Ed and Nerwan's post here to the first page, close the thread and call it a day :)

There really is nothing more left to say.
 
Last edited:
I, for one, welcome out 3rd party overlords.

Seriously though, 3PDs fill an important gap in games like this it behooves FD greatly to work with them as the tools provided in game (more like a toothpick than a shovel) do not adequately fill the needs of the player base. I am glad a line of communication has opened up and now the delivery is up to FD to implement. I trade on the side and can't think of doing it without EDDB or Thrudd's site.
 
So, the 'Ends justify the means' huh? This hasn't had a discussion, has it? I can't see 'using' your customer's voices to bully anyone, into agreeing with you. I have no trouble calling this action, and you, arrogant, and abusive. Your good will with the community will shield your group, but there is no difference here, that the Spicy Boy drama. Except that the players like the tools more than murder. Lucky you.

Nobody 'used' my voice for anything. I made a decision to use my own voice. I suspect the other people who commented did the same.

I mean you do realise that you're basically suggesting anyone who expressed support is a mindless automaton who was acting out a Pavlovian response, right? Pretty insulting that.
 
I believe you. I'm always [strike]amazed[/strike] dismayed when forum members assign malicious motives to developers, whether they be 1st party or 3rd party developers.

I know! That's what bugs me, the assumption from some that there is something nefarious behind any given action on people's parts in this game. While I have no doubt there are shadowy conspiracies and Star Chamber style justice dealt out in the RP game world, it's pretty safe to say that this doesn't exist from those intent on making, playing, or supporting it. Mistakes can happen, and different choices could have been made by people on any given issue, but that's not the same as scheming and plotting for malicious self interest.

Honestly I think it reveals more about those who make such claims than any of the devs (1st or 3rd party) involved.
 
Last edited:
You seem to misunderstand. FD did not commit to the 3PDs because they owe them anything, they did it because their *customers* made it clear that they were very likely to step away from this game (and very likely would have long ago) if these sites didn't exist. FD knows this, they're not blind or stupid. At the end of the day, for them, it's about money. That's not cynicism, that' reality. For the 3PD's, however, what they do is *purely* a labour of love, and thus they have no incentive or reason to promise anything to anyone. Do they want people to enjoy their sites and thus the game? OF COURSE, otherwise these tools wouldn't exist. Do they have any responsibility to promise these sites will live forever? Sorry, 'fraid not.

Your customers reacted to the threat of the loss of resources, not because you made a valid point. The point, needing to support out or game development, could have been made with the exact same appeal, without the threat (strike). The group either had no confidence in their audience, or they just felt the need for a display of power. Why didn't the group ask for help, before resorting to strong arm tactics, from the community?
 
Badgers are as badgers do!

.. well, it made about as much sense as yours in this context..


If they simply asked, that would be another thing all together. But, their request was fortified with an 'or else'. That's where the extortion comes in. If you take those actions, you have to accept the label.
 
I share most player's views that the third party tools are invaluable. And, I called on both FD and the out of game developers to work the issue out. But, that does not excuse the OP's group from deliberately using their sites visitors, from using our need, to further their goals. I contend the OP's group would have had the same results, without the strike. A thread to ask for community support would have worked, and been appropriate.

Compelling us to join in with them, or lose their sites is the definition of extortion.

Again, I don't think the naysayers like you understand. What "goals" do you think the 3PD's have? You all need to realize their goals are *your goals*. Serving our need *is their goal*. They want the sites to live, and they want the players to use them. End of story.

You are free to disagree with their methods though, your prerogative, but you can't separate them into a different class than you, we're all the same, they've just decided to put in free labour to hopefully make the game more enjoyable for everyone.
 
Last edited:
Ok, so FD have committed now its the 3rd Party Tools too.

So you the developers can now promise that if FD commit, you will commit that these sites and tools will continue to be developed till the end of Elites development ( 7 more years going by DB ).

No leaving the tools, when a new game comes out that you move to play.
You commit to the player base that these tools will stay online line and bugs and new features will be added while Elite is still running.


Let see if you commit too the users of your 3rd party tools.

You must be an Imperial. Well, except Imperials feed and clothe their slaves.
 
Last edited:
I share most player's views that the third party tools are invaluable. And, I called on both FD and the out of game developers to work the issue out. But, that does not excuse the OP's group from deliberately using their sites visitors, from using our need, to further their goals. I contend the OP's group would have had the same results, without the strike. A thread to ask for community support would have worked, and been appropriate.

Compelling us to join in with them, or lose their sites is the definition of extortion.

What are they extorting if this isn't an in-game resource? If it's only a community used resource, and anyone is free to take up the mantle and continue it for themselves? This was simply a statement of exasperation at the continued lack of response from FD (as stated in the OP's post). You are not compelled to join in if you don't agree with what they are doing, you are not compelled to use the tools, they are free (as in freedom of choice). FD could quite simply have ignored this.

As a developer I utterly understand their frustration at a moving target, or buggy interface that they are getting no traction on when they want to improve their own tooling (see comments about continued bug reports getting nowhere).

Maybe we just disagree with the method. I saw this more as the 3PD saying "we've had enough doing this without the feedback and help we need to improve, it's getting too hard, so we're stopping until it's resolved". FD responded, and I think we're in a better place for it.
 
Nobody 'used' my voice for anything. I made a decision to use my own voice. I suspect the other people who commented did the same.

I mean you do realise that you're basically suggesting anyone who expressed support is a mindless automaton who was acting out a Pavlovian response, right? Pretty insulting that.

No I did nothing of the kind. But, if you insist on reducing things to the absurd, I can't expect you to relate to what I'm saying. I feel that if the same methods were used on another topic, things would be different. And, we all know I could use some real life examples to make my point.

Separate what they did, the strike, from the cause behind it. It is a common understanding that, 'the ends can never justify the means'. I am just applying that axiom, to this current situation. That you support the out of game developers, shouldn't mean you have to support strong arm tactics, or extortion.
 
Last edited:
This isn't about caving, this is about ensuring future conversations happen so things like this don't happen again. We made an agreement and discussed things in a considered and calm way. We saw the original post for what it was, an important discussion topic for us to get involved in. We have expressed that we feel it could have been handled differently, and we all agreed that communication is key in future!

if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck ...it's a duck.
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom