Yaffle
Volunteer Moderator
And the moral of the story is.....
Is it 'if you can't do the time, then don't do the crime'?
And the moral of the story is.....
Well I hope it's true, I still have my doubts, if it is true then players have got off lightly, they could have been reset.
And the moral of the story is.....
And the moral of the story is.....
I think you're missing the point. If they're going to either take everything for cheating or target the affected modules, they screwed up royally with this weird "got some but not others, and some weren't even the right targets" deal going on.
Again: THEY MISSED ACTUAL EXPLOITED MODULES.
Get punished for cheating, but the guys doing the punishing will screw it up?
From what I'm gathering so far, the manner in which you've conducted your exploit punishment have been nothing less than extremely clumsy. Instead of only removing the rolls which were exploited, you've also elected to remove anything that might have been a legitimate roll. What you're literally telling us is "We know you cheated, but since we can't tell which module you cheated to upgrade, we're taking this sledgehammer to everything we think might have been exploited." I'm seeing a lot of people having lost their legitimately upgraded modules... and some performed the exploit once out of curiosity.
You're losing players pulling this stuff, guys. It's bad enough you guys took said sledgehammer to anything that looked suspicious, but according to reddit posts some people still have their exploited modules.
I'm really glad I didn't let my curiosity get the better of me... I probably would have had my FAS wiped from existence if I had from ONE module.
And the moral of the story is.....
Get punished for cheating, but the guys doing the punishing will screw it up?
For people who perhaps thought it would be interesting to see how it worked then yes, perhaps a bit extreme, though you know, perhaps not 'just see' how obvious exploits work..
Other than that I've not too much sympathy to be honest.
A more targeted adjustment would probably be better, I agree, but I've no idea how difficult it would be for FD to unpick things more precisely or if it is even possible at all.
Perhaps something of an over-correction in this case is reasonable if it would otherwise be at all time consuming - I'd prefer they get on with other things rather than spend a lot of dev effort on this.