This is a conversation not a legal case, you realise that right? i implied no such thing, you inferred.I did not say that you said they where quotes from yesterday I asked you if they were. Please check back one page or reread your own post which is two posts above to confirm.
You said those things implying they were direct quotes.
To be plain with you. Are they actual quotes from other people, things you made up yourself, exaggerations, dramatic prose, or to be candid untrue.
Pure fantasy.
So you are saying that CIG can insure against Key Personnel Leaving in the event of a Failure of the business, and then use that money to pay refunds to the backers?
Surely the Key Personnel Insurance would only cover sudden and unforeseen loss of the key employee not them leaving due to the company failing, and it would be unlikely to be a sufficient sum insured to cover refund?
When you said "I believe they are insured incase things go south" who is They? CIG or the Backers?
There's nothing more to do but pray for you.
There's nothing more to say but I'll be praying for you.![]()
Pretty sure it's the same everywhere. Key person insurance does not pay out to anyone in the event of a bankruptcy.http://www.iii.org/article/insuring-against-the-loss-of-key-personnel
Key person insurance doesn't cover your scenario. Maybe it's different in other countries...
Yet more of this Miles Yeahwut mission giver - I'm sure I'm not the only person utterly fed up with this guy before he's even appeared.
Their idea of "persistence" seems horribly complicated for no good reason, and extremely easy to exploit for many bad reasons.
So many bad reasons, I'm tempted to mention JSON, bot for even MOAR bad reasons I'm simply going to join the lulzbucket in gulping beer to take the terror away.
Persistence. ... Hmm regardless of if you have confidence in SC or not, you are thin ice using persistence as a stick to beat it on ED forums imo . At least they are planning on having some.![]()
Yeah, as soon as he started to twitch like that I was like "Nope! Out the airlock I go. I've seen The Thing enough times to know that no good can come of that.New ATV
Watch @ 7:50 [alien]
Was looking back over some old videos, and it's unbelievable that almost 3 years on and the combat/flight model still hasn't changed from this early nonsense:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT3ZvnUnUkU
I mean, 3 years! When Arena Commander was specifically sold as to be used by CIG to nail down the flight/combat mechanics, there has been literally no improvement, with the ships all still handling like noclip cameras with a cockpit glued to the front.
This is a conversation not a legal case, you realise that right? i implied no such thing, you inferred.
Though if you wanna push I can go find the post where you alleged those of us who are criticising it don't even play it, but generally sleutel has it bob on - they are directly representative of conversations repeatedly gone over in these threads.
"or to be candid untrue" lol it's like you're trying to face up to me in a fight! just talk bob. this should be a nice place.
A group of regulars 1. Insult them in this case using the word vile twice
Yes it is - and I'm not going to be badgered into spoiling that and turning this into legal for tat.This forum is not a conversation
Cut out the personal comments now please.
Stay on topic - which was Star Citizen.