Continuing the complaints about cockpits... i dont understand the big deal. I've been a pilot for 25+ years and quite a few aircraft, like some early WW2 warbirds and cold war era Soviet stuff are abysmal for both layout and visibvisibiolity. Ever flown a MiG-21? I have... visibility and cockpit layout is by far the most horrific I've ever had to expexperienced. Or we can discuss the visibility of early Bf 109s or the American P40s... CR wants to bring the feeling of WW2 to SQ42. He has said so repeatedly. Not every ship is going to have the cockpit of a Vulture or Keelback... thank goodness.
Well, I've finally finished downloading 3.0 and it actually runs better than I would have thought after reading all the posts from closed PTU players. The main problem for my system seems to be twofold, one problem is that the system can't stream data fast enough, due to me having installed the game on my 2 TB Storage HDD, a Samsung HD204UI, instead of a SSD, so I get small freezes when the game has to wait for the datastream to catch up and two beeing that my vidcard simply doesn't have enough Vram. My current system looks like this: i7 2600 on a H67 mainboard with 16 Gigs of ram, a GTX 670 with 2 Gig of VRam, running win10 on my 120 Gig SSD and everything else from the mentioned Samsung HD204UI HDD. It runs actually quite acceptable in arenacomander but then it also doesn't have to stream that much data in that mode. I'm getting a constant 30-35 FPS in Arenacomander even with lots going on and, if I leav my toon standing around for a bit so that the game can cache enough data, I get around 15-20 fps on crusader. That is until the game runs out of data and has to stream new stuff from my disk wich sends performance down the crapper. So having a fast SSD, preferably a PCI-E SSD, should help imensly to reduce stuttering caused by caching and also vidcard with 4 gig or more VRam seems to be absolutely the lowest one should use.
Edit: Also one thing that I foun d to be kinda anoying is the two speeds that the chararcter can move in. You can basically either walk around insanely slow or run around like an idiot. It would be really nice if there was some sort of fast walking speed avaliable.
Some of the best video games in history were from the late 80s.
I'm guessing if the cockpits were bigger the fps would be even lower.
Well srry guys/girls....I really tried....sometimes if I get lucky on less occupied servers FPS can go up to 20-30 but even that is barely playable.....FM sucks badly as you could see....graphics are eye candy but thats about it....anyway it is a bit more interesting to "play" 3.0 then 2.6 at least there is something to do.....
Well srry guys/girls....I really tried....sometimes if I get lucky on less occupied servers FPS can go up to 20-30 but even that is barely playable.....FM sucks badly as you could see....graphics are eye candy but thats about it....anyway it is a bit more interesting to "play" 3.0 then 2.6 at least there is something to do.....
Well srry guys/girls....I really tried....sometimes if I get lucky on less occupied servers FPS can go up to 20-30 but even that is barely playable.....FM sucks badly as you could see....graphics are eye candy but thats about it....anyway it is a bit more interesting to "play" 3.0 then 2.6 at least there is something to do.....
The flight model is still in process and CIG has said so repeatedly
Good for you, as I said. Others do. You know not everyone is not like you, right? So that is why people complain about the cockpits. Because a 'real simulation of soviet WW2 planes' is not what many non-you people want. So they say that. Because people dont say what you want them to say, but what they themselves want you to say. What exactly dont you understand?
Btw, how are the amazing recordings of the best ever fun with your awesome org mates going?
Obviously REAL fans want the crappiest verion of a old soviet plane. Next up:"Real SC fans love bugs, it simulates flying jets from Zimbawbe! I dont understand why people dont get it..."
They've also said it's just about finished, that they like it and that bar a few tweaks, it's essentially ready
Which one should we believe.
The flight model currently in the game is bad, unpopular and needs changing.
That doesn't mean CIG are going to change it, especially with work on S42 progressing again.
lol no
Ooh I remember this one from a couple of years back "the flight model is so good it just seems terrible".