Modes I know I'm beating a dead horse, but we need official PvE servers

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Like I said in a previous post, if they were to introduce a pve open server without giving some kind of incentive to play in the normal open server it would ruin the game for at least 25%-50% of the player base. The normal open server would become a no man's land.

The way they could do this would be to make the pve server payouts only half of the pvp server and collecting materials only be one at a time instead of 3.

I'd rather see actual rewards for pvp, ranking, skins, publicity. Incentives to participate. Lower insurance in pvp circumstances (war fighting, duels, assasinations, scenarios, etc.)
 
Why delude yourself with all that nonsense?
While only one mode has it all, find yourself switching, is de facto hiding.
 

Goose4291

Banned
No one is "hiding" anywhere.
They just chose not to play with some people, which is an advertised choice of the game and always was;

I think its not as clear cut as either side is making out.

While some people do indeed not 'hide' in other modes (because thats the way they prefer to play) there are those that use the other modes as a way to 'protect' themselves from people theyre attacking or competing against (see: the decline of Powerplay, as explained multiple times by people who've been massively invested in it since day one) or to 'hide' their activities so they dont get caught messing with someone elses sandcastle (ie toxic PF vs PF wars).
 
Once again we seem to be engaging in a bit of cognitive dissonance on the pro-gank side. On the one hand, we're told that many, even MOST people they kill love the experience and want it to be a part of the game, drop them a positive message... but on the other hand, having Open PvE would stop people from joining Open with PvP. Well, which is it? Do most people like being ganked, in which case people have nothing to fear from an Open PvE mode? Or do they hate it and just want to be able to play with strangers without worrying about it, in which case the case for Open PvE seems much stronger.

Either way, it's quite curious that folks are so against it. It's almost... ALMOST like they don't believe their own hype about how beloved their style of play is.

Also, apparently PvE Open would ruin the game for 'half' the players, but who is this 'half'? Citation needed.

(Also, side note, I think it's pretty appalling that some people would make fun of the idea that certain people less physically or otherwise capable of handling this sort of gameplay should be taken into consideration in this discussion)






There is no such nonsense as a "cognitive dissonance" "on the pro-gank side". There is however "Open", the All-group, and instances behind instancing to hide from it.

While there is, what you do not like, "consequences", a cause however accruing ones you exchanging one's stance towards one's goals, switching modes.


Folks are fine in Open.

Mode switcher are not.
 
Last edited:

AP Birdman

Banned
Open only PvE will kill the game, yet Open only PvP won't( As in the PP and BGS threads you've been seeing pop up)


HMMMMMM

In the games current state, I actually believe open only would kill the game as well. As I've stated many times, as well as many others have too, there would have to be many, many changes made for open only to even be feasible. I think open only would be better but I think the amount of changes to the core of the game to make it possible and inclusive for all players would be too monumental. I don't think Fdev have the ability or staff to pull something like that off. You'd might as well create a whole new game.

To all the people trying to argue with my point about a pve server ruining the game for a large portion of the player base, if what I'm saying wasn't true, Fdev would've made a pve server years ago.
You can try to argue with me till the cows come home but those are the facts.
 

AP Birdman

Banned
Source?

Because the game sold over 3.1 million copies over 3 platforms and I highly doubt you've spoken to "most people".
And even though it was said that "the majority of players play in open", it was also stated that "the majority of players don't get involved in PvP" by Mark Allen.
David Braben also stated he sees Elite: Dangerous as a co-op game, not a PvP game.

All of which is contrary to what you're claiming - and my information is directly from Frontier, so........




Frontier created a game where people don't have to trade in Open Mode, but they do.
Explorers don't have to run the gauntlet in Open to hand in, but they do.

Sorry, but just loading Open mode disproves you here, as everything that can be done in Solo and PGs is being done in Open Mode.
And to refer back to the same Sandro quote;

"the majority of players play in open"

So this proves that people want that "risk" - so a PvE mode wouldn't be as game breaking as you're claiming.
It would only really help those who are already not playing in Open Mode.

Source? How about I'm a griefer and I ACTUALLY see people's responses to what I do first hand.
Tell me Jockey, what sources do you have to argue my points?

Most players play in open because 1: its easier to meet up with your friends 2: it's the only way to meet other pilots in game. If everyone could get the same experience but without the risk of getting blown up by those other pilots while they're trying to run missions, why would you run your missions in the pvp server? Like I said, I can handle myself in pvp fight pretty well but even I wouldn't run missions in a pvp server if there was a pve open server available.
This is a pretty silly thing you guys are trying to argue.
 
Last edited:
In the games current state, I actually believe open only would kill the game as well. As I've stated many times, as well as many others have too, there would have to be many, many changes made for open only to even be feasible. I think open only would be better but I think the amount of changes to the core of the game to make it possible and inclusive for all players would be too monumental. I don't think Fdev have the ability or staff to pull something like that off. You'd might as well create a whole new game.

To all the people trying to argue with my point about a pve server ruining the game for a large portion of the player base, if what I'm saying wasn't true, Fdev would've made a pve server years ago.
You can try to argue with me till the cows come home but those are the facts.
Wait wat...you agreeing with me on something?



Who are you and what have you done with the real AP IBirdman?
 
Last night, I got my Anaconda, upgraded it a teensy bit (Still mostly stock though) and had a rebuy in case something happened. Private server my friends and I are on bugs out and we switch to open to meet up in a station. I literally do one jump, get interdicted by a Fed in an Imperial ship, and get blasted to bits... What do these people actually get out of it? a sick sense of accomplishment? I now have to play extra careful until I get my rebuy back... [knocked out]

p.s. Yes I am a member of Mobius, my friends weren't yet though, so it was said private server or open...



Get yourself lost.

No one needs you here, here is Open.
No one wants you, playing modes your note up to.

Get lost. Keep it to yourself.

Open is all in one.

With and without


edit

Open space, pun intended, scope in abundance
 
Last edited:
Source? How about I'm a griefer and I ACTUALLY see people's responses to what I do first hand.
Tell me Jockey, what sources do you have to argue my points?

I already told you, Frontier. Quotes from Sandro, Mark and David Braben.
I'll take their word over anyone on the forums. As they have the actual information.
Your limited, subjective experience is less than 0.01% of what actually goes on.

Most players play in open because 1: its easier to meet up with your friends 2: it's the only way to meet other pilots in game. If everyone could get the same experience but without the risk of getting blown up by those other pilots while they're trying to run missions, why would you run your missions in the pvp server? Like I said, I can handle myself in pvp fight pretty well but even I wouldn't run missions in a pvp server if there was a pve open server available.
This is a pretty silly thing you guys are trying to argue.

Let's look at this block of silliness, as you have no idea or proof over why "most" players play Open;

1)
Meeting up with friends is easier in PGs, as in Open the MM will try to match up other people as well.
When in a PG the MM connects other PG members only, without randoms getting in the way or clogging up bandwidth.
So if all your friends are in the same PG, you can find each other without having to be in a Wing.

2)
You can meet other pilots in PGs, so the game itself proves you wrong there.
I've met loads of random folks in Mobius, more than I've ever met in Open.

3)
Dealt with your "missions on PvE" already - the fact the majority of players play in Open disproves you.
So if you'd hide in PvE doing missions, then that's on you.
As other people are quite happy playing Open PvP doing them.

I'm starting to think you're arguing for argument's sake.
As Frontier themselves have proven your points wrong before you even made them.
The Mark Allen quote, the live stream with Sandro plus the live stream with David Braben are all on the WoI linked in my sig.

So if you don't like that FACTS, take it up with Frontier.
As all my information comes from them and is available on the WoI for easy reference.
And their facts trump your gut feelings and limited experiences any day.
 
Where do people go to get ganked after 1 jump? I've only played open for the past 8 months and been jumped by another player a single solitary time at a CG. I'd love to have more interaction with other players besides "o7" in chat and then they high wake out immediately as if they're running because they're scared of getting ganked.
 

Goose4291

Banned
Where do people go to get ganked after 1 jump? I've only played open for the past 8 months and been jumped by another player a single solitary time at a CG. I'd love to have more interaction with other players besides "o7" in chat and then they high wake out immediately as if they're running because they're scared of getting ganked.

I feel the same regarding these stories... and Im the sort of player who goes looking for trouble.

On a 'busy' night at a CG system, Im 'unlucky' if I bump into more than 3 such types.
 
Mobius exists because Frontier didn't want to add a PvE mode.
It has nothing to do with people avoiding anything.
Some people just don't want to PvP all the time - shown by the number of games that have PvE $ PvP modes / systems.
And Frontier dropped the ball here not doing the same.

Also, the number of "salty" posts from "griefers" / gankers here far outweigh the ones from the victims.
Just look how much crying went on in Sandros threads and those people are still crying for an open only game.
Even on the Kickstarter comments there is demands for open only, despite Frontier saying quite clearly there was going to be a mode system.

So PvP'ers were salty before the game even released.



Open only has nothing to do with it, salty PVPers or not.

It's hiding.
 
Oh look, you can keep repeating a lie....

No one is hiding, from you or anyone else.
We play how we want to play.

If you don't like it, you can always go play EVE Online - everyone has to play with you there.




Sounds like he ran out of things to say to me.

Can I ask a question.. What is the difference between the term 'hiding in solo/PG' and playing solo/PG to 'avoid griefers'? Is it just an objection to the provocative word 'hiding', rather than its actual meaning?


hide
verb

1. put or keep out of sight.
"he hid the money in the house"
synonyms: conceal, secrete, put in a hiding place, put out of sight, camouflage;

2. conceal oneself.
"Juliet's first instinct was to hide under the blankets"
synonyms: conceal oneself, secrete oneself, hide out, take cover, keep hidden, find a hiding place, keep out of sight;

3. use (someone or something) to protect oneself from criticism or punishment, especially in a way considered cowardly.
"companies with poor security can hide behind the law"
 
Last edited:
Can I ask a question.. What is the difference between the term 'hiding in solo/PG' and playing solo/PG to 'avoid griefers'? Is it just an objection to the provocative word 'hiding', rather than it's actual meaning?


hide
verb

1. put or keep out of sight.
"he hid the money in the house"
synonyms: conceal, secrete, put in a hiding place, put out of sight, camouflage;

2. conceal oneself.
"Juliet's first instinct was to hide under the blankets"
synonyms: conceal oneself, secrete oneself, hide out, take cover, keep hidden, find a hiding place, keep out of sight;

3. use (someone or something) to protect oneself from criticism or punishment, especially in a way considered cowardly.
"companies with poor security can hide behind the law"

Really? It's clearly meant as an insult - when it comes to words, context is key. There can be no arguement that of the definitions you listed yourself, the use of 'hiding in solo', within the context of these forums, is meant to invoke specifically 'in a way considered cowardly'. It's an endrun around forum rules against insulting people. Now, I play in Open, always have, from day one in a Sidewinder, have never logged into Solo, and not once has it occured to me to slag off Solo players as 'hiding like cowards'. Here's an analogy for you - I go down to the club (local tennis club with big screens) to watch footy on Saturdays, I never go to the local up the hill, because I simply do not enjoy that environment when I'm trying to relax with a pint and enjoy the game - do you think anyone has ever told me to stop hiding in the club?

PS No need for an official PvE server, there are already 3 - Open, Solo, and PG - you can offically PvE in all of them!
 
Last edited:
Can I ask a question.. What is the difference between the term 'hiding in solo/PG' and playing solo/PG to 'avoid griefers'? Is it just an objection to the provocative word 'hiding', rather than its actual meaning?


hide
verb

1. put or keep out of sight.
"he hid the money in the house"
synonyms: conceal, secrete, put in a hiding place, put out of sight, camouflage;

2. conceal oneself.
"Juliet's first instinct was to hide under the blankets"
synonyms: conceal oneself, secrete oneself, hide out, take cover, keep hidden, find a hiding place, keep out of sight;

3. use (someone or something) to protect oneself from criticism or punishment, especially in a way considered cowardly.
"companies with poor security can hide behind the law"

You are making an assumption that the people who play in Solo or PG are trying to avoid griefers. Or that they are trying to stay out of sight, conceal or protect themselves from aforementioned greifers.

I am sure some play in PG because they want to play with their friends and playing in open can make that difficult with the crazy match maker. And some are going to be playing in solo because thats the only mode you can take hi-resolution screen shots or network rubber banding etc.

To make that assumption paints you into a corner.
 
Can I ask a question.. What is the difference between the term 'hiding in solo/PG' and playing solo/PG to 'avoid griefers'? Is it just an objection to the provocative word 'hiding', rather than its actual meaning?


hide
verb

1. put or keep out of sight.
"he hid the money in the house"
synonyms: conceal, secrete, put in a hiding place, put out of sight, camouflage;

2. conceal oneself.
"Juliet's first instinct was to hide under the blankets"
synonyms: conceal oneself, secrete oneself, hide out, take cover, keep hidden, find a hiding place, keep out of sight;

3. use (someone or something) to protect oneself from criticism or punishment, especially in a way considered cowardly.
"companies with poor security can hide behind the law"

Looks like Ethaidan and 00nutzy beat me to it.

There was a time when accusations of "hiding" (along with "griefer") were met with warnings from the Mod team.
And still should be in my opinion.

People play the mode that suits what they are trying to do, which is how the game was made and advertised.
If that includes playing in a way that excludes some people, then that is perfectly viable.

I mean I could be here pointing out the 30 days I spent in Open.
Advertising my location to all on the forums and all these "hardcore" PvPers suddenly vanished from the area.

Where they "hiding" from my unarmed Beluga?
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom