Again with the ad-hominem attacks. You're not winning if you target the poster and not the post.
That's not what an
ad hominem is. An
ad hominem is a character attack in lieu of an argument. Here, let me give you an example.
Argument: "The sky is blue because God made it blue"
Ad hominem: "no, you're wrong, because you're an idiot"
See how no counter-argument was offered? Such as the following:
Counter-argument: "no, you're wrong, the sky is blue because of Mies scattering. Idiot."
Was there an insult? Yes. But it wasn't made in place of an argument, it was made alongside one. The argument is still there, therefore, it's not an
ad hominem.
On the internet, nobody knows if you're actually a fully trained Navy Seal, or a dog. Which brings me to YOUR fallacy. Your 'qualifications' (claimed, not demonstrated) are not an argument. That is an appeal to authority. If you know what it takes to make it work, then tell us. Show us. Otherwise, nobody has any reason to believe or care about what you claim to know. Or, as our math teachers all once said: show your work.
At the end of the day, you have raised such a tiny non-issue with this game that I don't even know where to begin. Even in DCS, which I play frequently, the 'pilot' in the cockpit only ever moves the stick and throttle around, and despite you, the player, flicking all kinds of switches for various reasons, all you ever see is the switch in the cockpit move, with no hand to flick it. What you have to do, to enjoy the game, is get over it. It's such a small thing, it shouldn't be too much trouble for a serious scholar like yourself.
