Not correct. It would have the form YOU wish. But I am not you, and I think my point was made well with the form I employed.
Well, what can i say to that?
I tried at least.
Not correct. It would have the form YOU wish. But I am not you, and I think my point was made well with the form I employed.
Now you say:You see, I do not care about people being sympathetic or understanding.
Bear in mind, that people being sympathetic or understanding is part of the thinking process. If they are sympathetic to your issue, or understand it, they are more likely to support it and listen to what you have to say.It is not true that I do not care what others think. Otherwise I wouldn't even have started a thread.
Now you say:I do not seek to change people's mind.
Which is seeking to change their minds by making them think twice before buying.I wanted to make people think twice about ignoring sloppy work.
But you do care, otherwise you'd not have made this thread.. correct?As I said, I do not care about being right or not.
Which they are much more likely to see, and understand if threads are constructive and helpful.If fdev understands there is a part of the community unhappy with the way they make their kits, I have a chance they improve them.
Considering the majority of this thread has not been about the ship kits, I wouldn't say this discussion has been helpful.If I speak my mind, I know already there will be people agreeing and others who do not. For me the discussion is still helpful either way.
I doubt you missed it because of my way of communicating.
Not once did i club you for your opinion. If you think i did, please let me know and i'll take a look and reconsider.
I do not understand why you attack me and you do not respect my opinion. It seems like you do not like criticism.
Rather impressed with yourself, aren't you?
Well, i think the Asp kit is pretty good, the regular one. The Raider one doesn't work too well though with non-raider textures.
You know what I've noticed about this forum?
Two things: A) it's full of old dudes, B) those old dudes like polite, constructive discourse that they can all participate in and get to the core of the issue; in order to present it to Frontier in a way that the developer can utilise that information the most efficiently.
You are being attacked because they didn't care for the tone of your OP.
They accept criticism, but it needs to be delivered in a non-confrontational manner that doesn't dismiss all other opinions as "white knighting" right off the cuff.
Your OP has resulted in a thread where no users have disagreed with the core critique but vast-majority of comments are discussing your atrocious communication-style instead. I don't think that listening to others and self-reflection are your strongest traits.And I think you missed the core of my critique, which was about push the devs to make things better. I doubt you missed it because of my way of communicating.
So if something is not worded as you wish, even if it is a good point, you dismiss it entirely. Even if you understood what I meant. That's weird.
Your OP has resulted in a thread where no users have disagreed with the core critique but vast-majority of comments are discussing your atrocious communication-style instead. I don't think that listening to others and self-reflection are your strongest traits.
Oh dear. Knocking FDev has become something of a cant here. New forum, same old cants.
I commend your patient attempts at helping the OP improve their communication skills o7
edit: ...although those attempts appear to be futile![]()
On the contrary, thanks to my very blunt and clearly worded communication style everyone agrees the ship kits are bad and such a long thread now has more chances to be viewed.
On the contrary, thanks to my very blunt and clearly worded communication style everyone agrees the ship kits are bad
Well, instead of talking about how to make fdev consider their kits are poorly made, you direct all your posts against my way of writing posts in a language which is not even my main language, posts irrelevant photos of the kits in an angle that hides what I am criticizing for example. You are not helping neither yourself nor the game.
Title: Dissastisfied with the quality of ship kits.
My issue is that ship kits are not consistent (both the shaders and geometry) with paintjobs, ship pieces are badly aligned and thrown there without any attention.
I remind fdev these cosmetics are not free and constitute the income for the game, so I would expect them to be of superior quality.
Here is an image showing what I mean (insert link). Please note the areas i have circled in the image that clearly highlight some of the issues.
What do others think? Am I alone in finding this an issue?
Which, in turn, makes me wish that, instead of selling specific ship-kits, they'd sell "part packs" which could be fitted to a variety of ships.
Also, it'd be lovely if, after fitting a roll-cage to my AspX (or Krait, or Vulture etc) it increased the hull armour a bit.
It's kind of ironic that it seems like it's the iCourier kit which has provoked this discussion, given that the iCourier kit is pretty nice, IMO at least.
Where was the OP back when FDev were phoning it in with the T6, Keelback and DBX ship-kits?
Those truly were atrocious and if FDev had any shame they'd redo them or, at least, revise them.