MKIV suggests an upgrade.It is a balanced modification - not an upgrade, speed is fairly traded for other capabilities.
But theres nothing balanced about the ship when its basically crippled
MKIV suggests an upgrade.It is a balanced modification - not an upgrade, speed is fairly traded for other capabilities.
Because it's wrong.Why not right? Are the early backers going to feel cheated after all this time?
Not really, Mk IV suggests a design revision/evolution - successive designs of given things need not be upgrades in the universal sense of the term.MKIV suggests an upgrade.
Speed is not the be-all and end-all, I have ALOT of flight hours in both the Mk III and the Mk IV, the latter is far from being crippled but it does require you to fly it a bit differently.But theres nothing balanced about the ship when its basically crippled
You found raxxxllaaaaaaaa!!!!!!Never mind these old ships grandad, lets have some new ones by new manufacturers.
The Gankertron by Griefton Lacey:
It’s a small planet and it pays no attention to physics. It laughs at permits and can smash its way into the creche to devour noobs. It’s armed with gravity, pulling any ship near by into it and has 150 medium to huge volcanoes that shoot plasma magma at players that not only kills their ships it devalues their ARX.
Only available to one man squadrons.
You found raxxxllaaaaaaaa!!!!!!
I do not think the Cobra Mk 4 is an example of how not to do things - the FSS/DSS changes on the other hand.The cobra 4 needs to remain exclusive to remind fd how not to do things. (and also its fun watching people getting eggy about it)
When the MKIV only gets about 1000 points more hull than the mkiii the loss of speed isnt worth the added hull or the extra small hardpoint. For being a full 200 m/s slower after engineering.Not really, Mk IV suggests a design revision/evolution - successive designs of given things need not be upgrades in the universal sense of the term.
Take a tank for example, a Mk 2 variant could be slower than a Mk 1 but have better armour. Depending on the use case the Mk1 may be considered better than the Mk2 but that does not mean that in other use cases the Mk2 is not better than the Mk1.
Speed is not the be-all and end-all, I have ALOT of flight hours in both the Mk III and the Mk IV, the latter is far from being crippled but it does require you to fly it a bit differently.
I suggest you read the EULA then, I believe FD reserve the right to waive any fees.I see no justification whatsoever in Frontier simply declaring that these items that others paid money for are now going to be available for FREE to any player
Not everything is about combat though - the Mk IV also has increased optional internal slots which in a multi-role context can matter more than combat ability. That being said, I believe the Mk IV is not worse at combat in general, just requires different tactics to what you would use for the Mk 3.When the MKIV only gets about 1000 points more hull than the mkiii the loss of speed isnt worth the added hull or the extra small hardpoint. For being a full 200 m/s slower after engineering.
The easier you can evade the longer you last.
The cobra mkiii can get 3.1k hull which with engineering is already maxing resistances and the 1k extra of enginerring on the Mk4 wont add that much extra redistance. Being slow, especially in a small ship, kills.
To be fair to FD - wording along those lines is pretty standard.They may well have some weaselly little legal clause in their terms and conditions...
I hate to burst your seemingly entitlement bubble but I have also spent a significant amount of cash on 'Game Extras' for ED.That's your interpretation. However, as someone who has spent a good bit of cash on 'Game Extras', I'm afraid I don't share your point of view.
Having spent a lot of money on the cosmetics myself I see your complaint as being tantamount to a sense of entitlement. If you honestly feel you are being hard done by then take it up with Customer Support, perhaps they will give you some Arx credit for free if they feel your complaint has true merit. Though if they do, I hope they proactively recompense everyone else in a similar situation.There's no entitlement 'bubble'. Just expectation that money I spend is actually being spent on something worthwhile. Discovering that others will soon be able to gain certain things I've bought with cash for free - simply by playing the game - is not right in my books!
MKIV suggests an upgrade.
But theres nothing balanced about the ship when its basically crippled