[Video] Open letter from community to Elite Dangerous

Incorrect.

The OP/Petition is detailed in both it's criticisms and proposed solutions so a regurgitation of those points for people in this thread simply giving in to trolls who want to avoid the points that were clearly made to them.

The petition was well written, made some good points, and personally i found nothing wrong regarding the contents.
 
He is right though. The nerfed missiles are a long standing issue of the game. I just made that a fact. Everyone who signed the petition agrees with me.
Now that was easy. I'll give you small seismic charges next.
I disagree with you and AA big time, but still gonna like it because that was legit funny.
 
Ohh, that's getting a bit of bad press with people calling it Borderlands 2.5. My son is enjoying it though, so that's all that matters.
Don't mind me much what people call it... laughed myself to tears again. If he ever comes across a side mission called Porta Prison, he should take it. Hilarious 😂
 
Incorrect.

The OP/Petition is detailed in both it's criticisms and proposed solutions so a regurgitation of those points for people in this thread simply giving in to trolls who want to avoid the points that were clearly made to them.
In certain areas, yes. In others, nope. Or are you saying that the goal of the petition is to remove Solo and PG which happens to be long standing issue according to the initiators of the petition?
If I can't fully agree with something I don't sign it.
 
You're thinking too much like a PvPer in this side topic. Try to think more like a PvEer, someone who makes builds just because they can and want, not because of some stupid meta.

But thats the point- B rated offers nothing that makes a noticeable difference other than (9?) integrity for a Beluga. Unless you intend to take specific module damage, its not doing anything. I do huge amounts of risky PvE doing sec murder and dodging ATR- I do it in almost stock Clippers that I burn, and I can fit E sensors and its the same outcome (other than cost in bounties) as if I'd fitted A BC or D. It makes no difference to my gimbals at all when fighting security it should.
 
Last edited:
I disagree with you and AA big time, but still gonna like it because that was legit funny.
We are probably both right. As someone who plays PvE without meta builds my Missile / MC Mamba is completely ineffective. It would be way more fun if these missiles actually did anything apart from exploding.
From a PvP perspective it probably looks completely different.
 
I believe the point is that it can't be summarised because 'FDEV, fix the long standing issues of the game' happens to be something that nobody can agree on. Some of the initiators don't like Solo / PG and others don't like the FSS. If you want to make a petition for something, the very least you should to define your demands.

This guy gets it.
 
But thats the point- B rated offers nothing that makes a noticeable difference other than (9?) integrity for a Beluga. Unless you intend to take hull damage, its not doing anything. I do huge amounts of risky PvE doing sec murder and dodging ATR- I do it in almost stock Clippers that I burn, and I can fit E sensors and its the same outcome (other than cost in bounties) as if I'd fitted A BC or D. It makes no difference to my gimbals at all when fighting security it should.

It gives more integrity and more range than D. Which was the reason for the build. I was happy with the result.

As for hull damage, it happend. B rated shields with armoured engineering. I could tank quite a bit.

I remember being in a fight against a dangerous Python, my shields dropped, and it unloaded volley after volley of missiles at me. Didn't lose a single module, everything kept working just fine.

That's the beauty of high integrity.

Note to self, do another one like that, was good fun.

As to what you do, that's you, not me ;)
 
In certain areas, yes. In others, nope. Or are you saying that the goal of the petition is to remove Solo and PG which happens to be long standing issue according to the initiators of the petition?
If I can't fully agree with something I don't sign it.

In all areas, yes.

I haven't stated the goals of the petition, they're plainly there for all to read.

Which is why I'm really confused about your point regarding the removal of Solo/PG... like.. at face value I like that idea.. but it's not been brought up by me in this thread because it's not at all been mentioned in the OP/Petition.

I can understand NOT signing something you don't agree with. I can't understand you coming here and going to war against something you didn't even read though.
 
It gives more integrity and more range than D. Which was the reason for the build. I was happy with the result.

As for hull damage, it happend. B rated shields with armoured engineering. I could tank quite a bit.

I remember being in a fight against a dangerous Python, my shields dropped, and it unloaded volley after volley of missiles at me. Didn't lose a single module, everything kept working just fine.

That's the beauty of high integrity.

Note to self, do another one like that, was good fun.

As to what you do, that's you, not me ;)

Fair enough- but don't artificially limit choice because you have to think a bit more about your build. It should extend beyond five letters and provide greater fidelity to your design.
 
Fair enough- but don't artificially limit choice because you have to think a bit more about your build. It should extend beyond five letters and provide greater fidelity to your design.

Nah, i'm fine, thanks to PvE allowing more choice, i have plenty of options, as opposed to having to follow a PvP enforced meta ;)
 
Would you care to summarise what those points were?

LOL, erm... i feel like...

itsatrap.jpg
 
Nah, i'm fine, thanks to PvE allowing more choice, i have plenty of options, as opposed to having to follow a PvP enforced meta ;)

What, lets compare:

Gimbals and whatever sensor you like because it makes no difference

Gimbals, think about sensor grade balance trading power, weight, range for better gimbal performance and / or EW resistance

But then most NPCs are pathetic anyway, so I suppose it does not matter.
 
In all areas, yes.

I haven't stated the goals of the petition, they're plainly there for all to read.

Which is why I'm really confused about your point regarding the removal of Solo/PG... like.. at face value I like that idea.. but it's not been brought up by me in this thread because it's not at all been mentioned in the OP/Petition.

I can understand NOT signing something you don't agree with. I can't understand you coming here and going to war against something you didn't even read though.
You just said that everything in the petition is detailed and with proposed solutions. What are the details for the 'long standing issues' of the game? There are none. So all I can do is to look at who initiated the petition and take a guess from there. Looks like you didn't read it either.
 
What, lets compare:

Gimbals and whatever sensor you like because it makes no difference

Gimbals, think about sensor grade balance trading power, weight, range for better gimbal performance and / or EW resistance

But then most NPCs are pathetic anyway, so I suppose it does not matter.

Like i said, for me personally, tying gimballs to sensors would be worse.
 
Back
Top Bottom