Yup, if you play long enough. Good ain't it.
But what's the monetary value of your play time?
Yup, if you play long enough. Good ain't it.
About 3 ganks per hourBut what's the monetary value of your play time?
S
Considering that people pay to play games like Elite Dangerous, then the value of your play time is negative; we would pay Frontier to allow us to play, maybe not much, maybe only pennies a week, but we would pay.But what's the monetary value of your play time?
S
I'm not saying you haven't read it somewhere but no, it's got nothing to do with consoles. We've had Frontier Points for a year or two now.With that said wasn’t this whole Arx thing because of X-Box and PS4? Thought I read that somewhere.
Let's put another slant on that. I've bought two skins out of two different packs, plus a nameplate, for £4.99.
Before, I would have paid £8 for those. And I still have 5000 Arx = £2.82 left. So if you consider that that is still money I can spend, then I only paid £2.17. That is less than the cost of one paint pack and only just over the cost of the nameplate.
And I've made around 800 Arx in the last three weeks, which is another £0.45 of spending power.
I really don't have a problem with Frontier sitting on £2.82 of my money. That's such a small amount that I can write it off.
If you can't stand the idea of Frontier sitting on your Arx, then, once you get over £2.99, no matter what the cost of your purchases, you can buy them with combinations of Arx packs and only "waste" a maximum of £2.28, all the way up to at least £250. I have the spreadsheet to prove it.
I believe this argument is relevant if you ignore the option to earn Arx ingame AND assume that people only want to buy one paintjob. By the way, if Frontier ends up with more money using the new system that's probably because people decided to spend more money..... But but but.... you're completely missing the point. You can't just buy the items.. you have to buy more arx than you need, so the average arx cost is meaningless because we as humans buy ARX BUNDLES, not arx. That is the primary intention of the system, mandatory overbuys (increased human wallet outlay) contrasted to weeks or months of grinding to not do so.
That post demonstrates people are falling for the ultimate fleecing, by not noticing the wallet outlay and instead thinking its cheaper. ABSOLUTELY BY DESIGN. They got you.
Just in case you need a reminder, there is zero duplication cost, so all that matters to frontier is what they fish out of your wallet. They could with zero impact give you the entire store, sell at any price they want if it means people are going to pay more. The actual items and the numbers on them are invisible to frontier apart from bait to work the other side of the arx bundle not being considered in the op.
I'm not saying you haven't read it somewhere but no, it's got nothing to do with consoles. We've had Frontier Points for a year or two now.
why? its just highlighting how much a dashboard plant costs...Frontier must hate doing anything for this game or community.
Let's put another slant on that. I've bought two skins out of two different packs, plus a nameplate, for £4.99.
Before, I would have paid £8 for those. And I still have 5000 Arx = £2.82 left. So if you consider that that is still money I can spend, then I only paid £2.17. That is less than the cost of one paint pack and only just over the cost of the nameplate.
And I've made around 800 Arx in the last three weeks, which is another £0.45 of spending power.
I really don't have a problem with Frontier sitting on £2.82 of my money. That's such a small amount that I can write it off.
If you can't stand the idea of Frontier sitting on your Arx, then, once you get over £2.99, no matter what the cost of your purchases, you can buy them with combinations of Arx packs and only "waste" a maximum of £2.28, all the way up to at least £250. I have the spreadsheet to prove it.
View attachment 146831
(|The "price" column is calculated according to £2.99 per 5000 Arx, which is the most pessimistic.)
It has everything to do with consoles and profit. Sony and Microsoft do not allow DLC/cosmetics/etc to be purchased directly with money. It has to be a fake currency. That's the reason FDev went with the fake currency on PC. More money.
Thanks for posting this! I would also link (from that same reddit thread) this table, since it seems to spell out the actual pricing scheme behind paintjobs:
I believe this argument is relevant if you ignore the option to earn Arx ingame AND assume that people only want to buy one paintjob. By the way, if Frontier ends up with more money using the new system that's probably because people decided to spend more money.
So the only products that have increased in price are the patterned paints
Noooooo one ever bought tactical or military, yeah, you're totally right on that one...If you look at pack value, all paints that are priced over 1000 Arx are more expensive since a pack used to cost 300 FP - 6000 Arx after conversion - 3 GPB
that includes most (if not all) of the nicer paints like Horus, Galvanized, Salvage, Mechanicist, Operator, Predator etc
Tactical, Vibrant and Military were all toned down - i assume because no one was buying them anyways and it makes good PR (look ma', the paints are cheaper now), with the sole exception of Tactical Ice and Tactical Graphite that were most used and ... they simply vanished
edit: not including here the crazy special paints like crypsis or pulse/fusion
Noooooo one ever bought tactical or military, yeah, you're totally right on that one...
goes and deletes all his Inara ship pics
That is the patterned paint (not my terminology).If you look at pack value, all paints that are priced over 1000 Arx are more expensive since a pack used to cost 300 FP - 6000 Arx after conversion - 3 GPB
that includes most (if not all) of the nicer paints like Horus, Galvanized, Salvage, Mechanicist, Operator, Predator etc
People like me, who wouldn't pay £3 for a paint-job, are doing very well out of the unbundling, no matter how much the individual prices have increased