Good discussion, but it will never end as you cannot possibly be correct in your logically deduced conclusions. This is a path I too have walked
For some odd reason an unpleasant character from a children's story keeps coming to mind
Just saying they're not true doesn't disprove them, either.
You're conflating "broken" with "buggy", and really inflating a few bugs into a greater problem than they are.
Arguing against something that is not somebody's argument is pretty much definitively a strawman. You're replacing what they said with what they did not say, as you just stated.
This statement is saying nothing. Vague reference to "different reasons" to support your vague statement.
Are you making an argument against yourself here? You're acting as though your opinions prove your other opinions true.
The use of patron was correct.
Well, aside from digging all the way back to Tuesday for that one, it's pretty much exactly accurate.
Are you just using terms you've seen on the internet at random?ok boomer
I'm obviously facing right and have a cowboy hat.
You can't sign a petition that literally says: "We don’t ask for new content", and then turn around and complain that there's no new content.my days of fighting for ui usability have ended, so nowadays i sometimes simply squint my eyes. works but can have side effects!
the only reason you have to state that the 'delay' is a response to the open letter is that frontier stated so, which is as dubious as an assurance as can be. there is a lot of evidence though pointing to other factors (which have been discussed at length so i won't re-iterate).
even if it were true, what the openletterers where asking for was quality, period. it means doing work professionally. a delay is not necessarily a requirement for that (although it can be fairly accepted as a necessity when stuff has gone too stale, which is the case). (they also naively asked for 'beta' which was a gross miscalculation on their part).
least but not last ... frontier has ostensibly not changed their ways (sloppy beta, untested code in release, etc), which is what the delay was supposed to be for.
now, you may agree with yamiks or not, i don't share much of his opinion myself, but the sequence of events i just described can hardly be disputed. in that scenario the whole "players don't know what they want and will moan anyway", while enclosing a fundamental and universal truth is completely uncalled for and is simply an ad-hominem (at a whole diffuse and abstract collective). i'll grant you that yamiks' poor choice of video title had it coming ...
There are very few issues with the January update, and many were ironed out incredibly quickly. There was a beta. The update included many player-requested changes.
