Shut down my Internet?a few days ago a Starbucks server tested positive for Covid 19
Shut down my Internet?a few days ago a Starbucks server tested positive for Covid 19
Serious scientific question for all Greta worshipers, environmentalists, and various woke lefties
please give your opinion on this: a few days ago a Starbucks server tested positive for Covid 19 and yesterday Starbucks announced that they were temporarily banning the use of all personal cups. Obviously this presents a big dilemma, and one that will effect all coffee shops that follow Starbuck's lead.
In response to this announcement that you will henceforth be forced to use disposable cups for your delicious caffeinated beverages, will you:
A) Go ahead and choke down the shame and just drink from a disposable cup, or...
B) Do the right thing for the planet and give up your Starbucks (or the many alternative coffee barista alternatives) completely?
I understand what you are saying.That isn't how things work in the real world. Things adjust to available resources. Or we make more. What is available is a variable and more complex than you know. Normal life is doing that. Your simplifying things you've never dealt with sufficiently. Hard to explain it to you also. To much to fill in. How much is available is a complex subject and varies heavily per area and by many other factors including population size and other things. Environmentalism is extremely simple. As is most things related to science in the modern sense. For the same reason too. People who don't deal with things much in real life trying to deal with real subjects. It's like the difference in general between engineers and scientists. Scientists are extremely ignorant today and if looking at a real world subject will come up with lots of fanciful ideas and extremely simple generalization to things they have made dogma. Engineers have to deal with details to do it correctly and understand variation. One thing is efficient in one location under one circumstance. It isn't in another. That can be two feet away. Nothing is simple.
Sadly science is invading engineering now. So, it will be simplified. And china's infrastructure problems will be small eventually in comparison.
BTW, most environmentalism is harmful. If you take incorrect or simple information and apply it you get a very different result than what you think in practice.
Remember, politicians are not educated. They just take information to use it to their own ends. They should always be considered snakes in the grass. It's like teachers now a days. If they knew more they would be doing something else for a living.
The storm problem is that the scientists don't know what they are facing.3500 deaths attributable world wide vs nearly 15,000 deaths during the same time frame for the seasonal flu in the US alone. When the virus was mostly dwelling behind the Chinese curtain of lies and disinformation it was easy to jump to conclusions, but now that it's been out in the world for past few months (that we know of!) it's easy to see that this is a storm in a tea cup being whipped up for (I can't say without breaking the forum rules on certain types of discussions). It's not good, but it's not the existential threat that is being promoted by the media.
@WeComeInPeace seeing as how thousands, if not millions, of people have been or currently are infected and are not being tested, the real numbers have to be much much more optimistic than those on that tracker. The vast majority of testing is only being performed on the critical cases.
If we are lucky it will. Given it magically targets certain age groups it would take down all the politicians in one go!! ><This. It's certainly very serious, but not the "black plague" of our modern era.
I'm surprised with their money they don't try to invest in or have made an eco friendly low fuel hybrid or some cool new type jet. Maybe it's a safety thing, but some of those new airplane designs are pretty interesting.Okey dokey then.
I'll just leave these right here......
Remember:
#DoAsIVirtueSignalAndNotAsIDo
View attachment 164729
View attachment 164730
And as of last month, these altruistic eco-warriors had the audacity to fly in a private chartered jet. Courtesy of JP Morgan. All the way from Vancouver Island, Canada, across the continental United States to Miami Florida. To attend an exclusive, A lister finance summit where Just Harry pontificated to some of the wealthiest billionaires in the world about mental health issues. You simply. Cannot. Make. This. Up.
And oh yeah. JP Morgan. One of the worst white collar criminal investment banks (second only to Goldman Sachs) responsible for global warming & climate change from jet related atmospheric emissions. Second only to their part in the global financial bubble implosion in 2007-2009.
That is not how you start a discussion, but sure.
1) That is not a serious scientific question. It is not even a non-serious scientific question. It is a moral question, at best.
2) I am not quite sure how big a thing disposable versus renewable cup is in the first place, when I read about Starbuck's decision it was the first I heard of this supposedly being a major issue. Maybe I am missing something, but it sounds like a PR move by Starbucks to signal how careful and aware of the virus they are. When infection starts spreading people will avoid these 'luxury/accessory' stores like, well, the plague. Nobody is going to work on their first novel on their MacBook in a fancy coffeeshop for a while...
3) Personally I make my own coffee at home, and at work we use mugs that are washed at the end of the day. As a Greta-worshipping woke lefty environmentalist I couldn't care less about what Starbucks does; I am Dutch and there ain't no way I am going to pay $10 or whatever for a cup of coffee. Reusable or otherwise.
Ian, you say that that isn't a way to start a conversation...but this is the first time you've addressed me or commented on a post of mine in months, so something must be working![]()
Serious scientific question for all Greta worshipers, environmentalists, and various woke lefties, please give your opinion on this: a few days ago a Starbucks server tested positive for Covid 19 and yesterday Starbucks announced that they were temporarily banning the use of all personal cups. Obviously this presents a big dilemma, and one that will effect all coffee shops that follow Starbuck's lead.
In response to this announcement that you will henceforth be forced to use disposable cups for your delicious caffeinated beverages, will you:
A) Go ahead and choke down the shame and just drink from a disposable cup, or...
B) Do the right thing for the planet and give up your Starbucks (or the many alternative coffee barista alternatives) completely?
About three weeks ago I caught the worst cold of my adult life. I was literally bed ridden for about four days, then extremely debilitated for another ten or so. Even after that I struggled with a terrible cough, intermittent fever, terrible headache, etc. I was able to work through it, but it was pretty awful. My whole family was sick to one degree or the other, but I was the worst by far. Now, other than having some tendons sewed back together when I was in my late teens I've never been to a doctor for anything and I wasn't about to go the hospital for something like this, but it really does make me wonder: how would I or anyone else in my situation actually know for sure whether they'd caught the Covis 19 virus, or just something else that was pretty nasty?That is more due to me being stuck in the house with flu-like symptoms, so I ran out of my usual routine.![]()
About three weeks ago I caught the worst cold of my adult life. I was literally bed ridden for about four days, then extremely debilitated for another ten or so. Even after that I struggled with a terrible cough, intermittent fever, terrible headache, etc. I was able to work through it, but it was pretty awful. My whole family was sick to one degree or the other, but I was the worst by far. Now, other than having some tendons sewed back together when I was in my late teens I've never been to a doctor for anything and I wasn't about to go the hospital for something like this, but it really does make me wonder: how would I or anyone else in my situation actually know for sure whether they'd caught the Covis 19 virus, or just something else that was pretty nasty?
I had very severe symptoms, but my wife had no more than a mild cold and the kids sort of ran the gamut in between the two of us parents.Without getting it tested (either for the virus then or later for antibodies)? You won't know. In your case, it being three weeks ago, it was more likely not COVID19 I suspect. But it might have been. The crappy part is that COVID can also express itself way less seriously, more like a mild flu or even the common cold. In my case it sounds far less serious than you. Oddly enough we have two types of 'fever' over here: 'verhoging' (98.6-100.4 F) and 'koorts' (or 'real fever'; above 100.4F). I have the first one, which means I dont have a fever in Dutch but I do in English. Didn't know that, so not clue what WHO means with 'fever' as a symptom.
For the rest it is painful breathing, headaches, painful throat, fatique. I usually have this once or twice a year so no major concern to me, but of course it is somewhat worrisome regarding potentially spreading something more serious. So I cancelled my visit to my grandparents and will work from home for a bit until I feel better (company policy for now: if you have flue-like symptoms, please get lost for a bit). It is a tricky one; if you do have COVID authorities need to know so they can monitor your social surrounding. If you don't have it you're wasting already limited resources. Given I don't know anybody who has been demonstrably infected, haven't been to an at-risk zone, we're just at the onset stage and I frequently have similar symptoms (minus the breathing part though) I'm currently waiting a bit. If it stays the same for a few more days I'll call my physician and let her decide. That would only waste a minute of her time and we have dedicated timeslots for such random calls.
In any case, glad you and your family recovered, whatever it was!
Serious scientific question for all Greta worshipers, environmentalists, and various woke lefties, please give your opinion on this: a few days ago a Starbucks server tested positive for Covid 19 and yesterday Starbucks announced that they were temporarily banning the use of all personal cups. Obviously this presents a big dilemma, and one that will effect all coffee shops that follow Starbuck's lead.
In response to this announcement that you will henceforth be forced to use disposable cups for your delicious caffeinated beverages, will you:
A) Go ahead and choke down the shame and just drink from a disposable cup, or...
B) Do the right thing for the planet and give up your Starbucks (or the many alternative coffee barista alternatives) completely?
Starbucks, Nespresso caught in child labour scandal
Starbucks and Nespresso are caught up in a child labour investigation after a new documentary discovered children as young as eight working in their coffee bean farms.
A clip of the documentary posted to the Dispatches Channel 4 Facebook page shows multiple twelve-year-olds working for 31p an hour.
But when the news say there are now 266 infected people in the Netherlands I can't help but smile and think:"No, you know of 266 people, there are way more among us...". And yes, that might include us...