I never really considered a plan before so i decided to get something on paper.
1. Try not get killed
That's all I've got right now tbh, needs a bit of work
I was thinking more along the lines that the airlines as we know them will not exist on their own merits after this hashes out. Without massive governmental intervention they will simply go bankrupt and that will be the end of commercial air travel. We won't let that happen, obviously, but propping them back up is going to be a costly pursuit. Every country is probably struggling with the same issues right now: how do we keep our economies and commercial industries solvent during the crisis, and how do we put it all back together once it "ends."
I predict that banks in America will offer to put a freeze on all mortgage/loan payments this coming week, for instance, and we already know that several massive stimulus packages are being prepped to put cash in the hands of every American to help cover the cost of living, as well as a payroll stimulus to keep the various workforces of business medium to large sized going. That's just for starters to calm people down; obviously the road to economic recovery is going to be complicated and bumpy even in a best case scenario.
It's best to fill re-sealable containers, but the bottom line is that you fill whatever you can. If it get's bad enough people will be drinking from toilet bowls, mud puddles and drainage ditches, even though that's sub-optimal. The best plan is to get away from major city centers and into the country, but that brings it's own rub as the people attempting to do that (in my little worst case scenario I'm hypothesizing) will be the one's that folks in rural areas will need to be on the lookout for: some of these people fleeing the cities will be truly dangerous criminal types, and others will just be desperate people willing to do anything, and both groups could easily decide to resort to desperate measures to ensure their continued survival, namely breaking into country homes to take what they need. This scenario, assuming the government has broken down and there are no "emergency services" to call for help is where the ability to protect yourself and your home with deadly force will be crucial.1. You can drink stuff like that up to about a week, and that's without using purification tablets/straining/boiling it (delete as available).
2. Only reason they're likely to break in is if they know your there. Most people will be doing 'the great panic' rush to get out the city at that stage.
3. Agree lights off, away from windows, dig in.
4. Agree to an extent. I operate on the principle that government will still try to maintain control, so heading where they are isn't a bad idea (Although, do it off the beaten path).
Is hydroxychloroquine, or the Bayer Chloroquine being widely used in Germany?
Because we still cannot say why people there are doing exceptionally well... it would be really positive if this were the reason.
@Ian Skippy civilization is predicated upon violence; even if you see no need to resort to violence yourself, your everyday survival, prosperity and well being is ensured by those willing to commit violence on your behalf. It probably won't happen, but if this gets out of hand and governments start collapsing, the people who commit violence so you don't have to think about it will no longer be around to do so, and when that happens those unable to protect themselves will be lambs in a countryside prowling with wolves.
You want to be a private corporation again? Sure, just pay the people their money back.
Yeah, being responsible for only one's self would be a lot easier. With everything going on, sometimes I wake up in the middle of the night and the weight of knowing that I'm all that stands between the world and the welfare of my children comes down pretty heavily on me.Oh, I am not disputing any of that.Thing is that there are legion of hypothetical future threats; some more probably than others, and some are easier to prepare for than others. I have no illusion of being able to shield or protect myself from all possible harm and eventualities, so it all comes down to how much risk you are comfortable with. And I can live with the understanding that if society completely breaks down and gangs are roaming the streets of Mechelen that I'll be a in a tough spot. But even in the unlikely event of a complete societal breakdown I would still not be primarily concerned with chainsaw-wielding maniacs coming for my canned beans, but more for things like that massive and pretty dated nuclear power plan ten miles from my home, the complete absence of any local food production and so on. Lets face it: if something like that would happen, I am simply screwed. Same as with much more boring but infinitely more probably events like getting cancer or being hit involved in a traffic accident.
So I will do some very basic preparatory stuff: I stay fit, have some supplies, know first aid and such. If that is not enough, c'est la vie. I am also not responsible for anyone, so that makes it all a bit easier.
obviously the road to economic recovery is going to be complicated and bumpy even in a best case scenario.
My sensible plan for acute civil unrest and looters in particular is to pile their bodies in the front yard with a sign that says "These guys were looters."
My sensible plan for acute civil unrest and looters in particular is to pile their bodies in the front yard with a sign that says "These guys were looters."
It's best to fill re-sealable containers, but the bottom line is that you fill whatever you can. If it get's bad enough people will be drinking from toilet bowls, mud puddles and drainage ditches, even though that's sub-optimal. The best plan is to get away from major city centers and into the country, but that brings it's own rub as the people attempting to do that (in my little worst case scenario I'm hypothesizing) will be the one's that folks in rural areas will need to be on the lookout for: some of these people fleeing the cities will be truly dangerous criminal types, and others will just be desperate people willing to do anything, and both groups could easily decide to resort to desperate measures to ensure their continued survival, namely breaking into country homes to take what they need. This scenario, assuming the government has broken down and there are no "emergency services" to call for help is where the ability to protect yourself and your home with deadly force will be crucial.
@Ian Skippy civilization is predicated upon violence; even if you see no need to resort to violence yourself, your everyday survival, prosperity and well being is ensured by those willing to commit violence on your behalf. It probably won't happen, but if this gets out of hand and governments start collapsing, the people who commit violence so you don't have to think about it will no longer be around to do so, and when that happens those unable to protect themselves will be lambs in a countryside prowling with wolves.
Yeah, being responsible for only one's self would be a lot easier. With everything going on, sometimes I wake up in the middle of the night and the weight of knowing that I'm all that stands between the world and the welfare of my children comes down pretty heavily on me.
A fellow "big picture" guy.This is great news for the health of our planet.
And this will allow us to think about a new mode of production / consumption with a minimum of pollution.
You watch too much of Sergio Leone's films.![]()
This is a game changer.
Fortunately there's some promising new technologies that may advance how virus treatment will be handled going forward.
I've seen reports of one technique that leapfrogs vaccine development and is attempting to isolate and replicate effective antibodies for direct injection.
If proven effective, it will be particularly helpful for those with weakened immune response systems as it won't depend on the host producing it's own antibodies.
There are now more resources than ever before competing to develop new treatments that will work in any virus outbreak.
A fellow "big picture" guy.
There's no doubt that this will have the side effect of being great for the health of the planet in terms of emissions, over population, pollution and resource consumption, but that's where the socialistic liberal fantasy ends. The days of western civ's affluent navel gazing where we make up problems to be obsessed with because we can afford to are already over, even if the most ferocious zealots can't see it. When the smoke clears and the dust settles ultra liberalism will be struck a death blow and hard headed pragmatism and conservative family values will reign for the next 2-3 decades if not longer. Quite literally, people in western civ will have more important matters to occupy their attention.
That's where the leadership in Washington is really starting to rev up. Between sweeping aside federal regulations, bringing in the private sector and harnessing the mighty engine of our economy, we're getting closer all the time to finding solutions. Hopefully my "worst case" question will never need to be answered!This is a game changer.
Fortunately there's some promising new technologies that may advance how virus treatment will be handled going forward.
I've seen reports of one technique that leapfrogs vaccine development and is attempting to isolate and replicate effective antibodies for direct injection.
If proven effective, it will be particularly helpful for those with weakened immune response systems as it won't depend on the host producing it's own antibodies.
There are now more resources than ever before competing to develop new treatments that will work in any virus outbreak.
Brings up a question I haven't thought of before now. Has Frontier released any announcements on how this is effecting their plans? I imagine that lots of schedules in the electronic entertainment industry are slipping big time.For months, the community is looking forward "The New Era".
Well maybe we will have the cheese AND the dessert.
![]()