The NIAID has revised down the predicted death toll for the US to ~60k. Hopefully that turns out to be the case.
Herd immunity, achieved one way or another, is really the only way a viral pandemic ends.
Inducing herd immunity by doing nothing early on is definitely a silly strategy though.
I think we're going to see much lower than a .66% final mortality rate, with treatment, in the end, both due to infection likely being more widespread than reported and improvements in treatment procedures as we learn about the progress of COVID-19.
The oft repeated points about why mitigations are imposed are spot on though...can't treat everyone if everyone gets it at nearly the same time and health services have marginal surplus capacity.
Oh there is definitely work that needs to be done and some work that is all the more necessary during a pandemic. I'd never get in the way of this and I encourage anyone willing and able to perform such labor without exposing others to undue risk to do so...and to charge as much as they can get away with for their time.
Personally, I don't think people should have to actively work for the good of society; I think good systems reward those who do, and refrain from penalizing people for stepping back if they'd be getting in the way. The idea of work for it's own sake, or to pad financial abstractions like market indices, has never jived with me.
Good. Half of them should have been rendered defunct in the last crisis.
The powers that be don't care about black people and they care about the African continent even less.
Herd immunity isn’t a realistic goal, even when you are an optimist like me.
Herd immunity, achieved one way or another, is really the only way a viral pandemic ends.
Inducing herd immunity by doing nothing early on is definitely a silly strategy though.
It is far, far worse than that. The .66% mortality is provided hospital care is available to all those who need it. If that is done, 'only' .66% will die. But if you infect 60% of the norwegians in a year, that means 3 million will be infected, of which 300,000 will need to be hospitalized for an average of ~23 days. If you spread them out perfectly evenly you can have 16 'loads' of patients (365/23). That means that for the next year every single day almost 19,750 COVID beds will be taken. On average, Norway has 3,600 normal hospital beds non-occupied and a total of 800 ventilators. Worse, it is quite possible that those who were infected are not always immune, especially the milder cases. Best of luck.
I think we're going to see much lower than a .66% final mortality rate, with treatment, in the end, both due to infection likely being more widespread than reported and improvements in treatment procedures as we learn about the progress of COVID-19.
The oft repeated points about why mitigations are imposed are spot on though...can't treat everyone if everyone gets it at nearly the same time and health services have marginal surplus capacity.
And I agree with that, to a point.
However there are those of us who still have to work (and volunteer) to keep the country ticking over need to go to work, and some of us are in minimum wage/low paying jobs.
When I have to step back onto the deck of a ship to deliver aid where its needed, I'll be working. Even now because I've always worked for the good of society, I'm out on in the village ready to deliver goods to and check up on those whom are vulnerable.
TL/DR: I didn't like the sneering down the nose idea of Patrick's post that somehow those of us wanting to continue to work for the good of all don't have our Human dignity or pride, when it's us ensuring that the electricity is on so Patrick can spam badly formed 'English speaking west bad' prose.
Oh there is definitely work that needs to be done and some work that is all the more necessary during a pandemic. I'd never get in the way of this and I encourage anyone willing and able to perform such labor without exposing others to undue risk to do so...and to charge as much as they can get away with for their time.
Personally, I don't think people should have to actively work for the good of society; I think good systems reward those who do, and refrain from penalizing people for stepping back if they'd be getting in the way. The idea of work for it's own sake, or to pad financial abstractions like market indices, has never jived with me.
We could have another run on the banks without any more pretend money to prop them up.
Good. Half of them should have been rendered defunct in the last crisis.
Detroit it taking it pretty hard, with a disproportionate volume of casualties among the black population.![]()
Covid-19 is disproportionately taking black lives
Hundreds of years of racism has delivered poor health and economic outcomes for black people, making them more vulnerable in the pandemic.www.vox.com
One simple reason for increased infection is the use of public transport being higher by the poorest people. But there might be a biochemical reason too.
ACE-inhibitor drugs are well known to be less effective in this subset of patients.
SARS Cov2 virus binds to the ACE2 protein as its receptor.
One pathway around ACE inhibition is having plenty of ACE2. Maybe the same reason the virus is more deadly here.
Edit:
Crap.
What happens on the African continent then? I hope I am wrong about the biochem.
The powers that be don't care about black people and they care about the African continent even less.