Try explaining to somebody that you need the money to prepare for the next epidemic, as you raise their taxes or make cuts to the welfare state, and see what happens.
You imply this was the sort of choice we were faced with.
There is no scenario where investing in prevention is more expensive than even a relatively mild epidemic, nor where the preparations made for a pandemic are more expensive than being unprepared.
In some cases (the US for example), necessary funding was already secured, and then rolled back. In any case, there is little one could spend the money on that would result in better returns.
Stuff that seems like a good idea at one time can seem like huge blunder with hindsight.
Plenty of other things that look like the blunders they actually are right from the moment of their conception that still get funded.
Again, in this case it's not a matter of hindsight, but foresight. We knew what was coming, in general terms, and we (or our political leaders) chose to take the radically more expensive and wasteful option.
I find it hard not to see how much erroneous disinformation surrounds the COVID-19 event and wonder why this has gained so much attention by the world press, while at the same time the flu goes on year after year with little or no attention. No daily big bad bleeding red map. No press coverage.
The same reason anything novel gains so much attention. Just look at Columbine or 9/11. Influenza is a chronic problem and chronic problems are not novel.
COVID-19 is easy to hype up because it is actually a serious problem, with serious repercussions, whose effects have been greatly amplified by neglect. It's novelty will still wear off in short order.
I'm all for beating back infectious disease, but the economic and social costs should not be ignored.
The only time the economic and social costs were ignored was when warnings weren't heeded. They've been a key concern of policy decisions after the fact.
I respect the experts from the medical field, but I don't think they should have the last word on our individual liberties and economic decisions. There input is required and helpful, but I'm not willing to shred the Constitution of my country on their insistence.
You're blaming the messengers, and the honest reality of the message, for the decisions of political leaders.