They are only wearing those caps because their hairdos are a mess. Normally they'd let their free flags fly!I don’t get it? Non of those guys need a hair cut,![]()

They are only wearing those caps because their hairdos are a mess. Normally they'd let their free flags fly!I don’t get it? Non of those guys need a hair cut,![]()
Idk how many member States there are in WHO, but certainly more than one . I am waiting to see how that whole thing plays out, but there is a chance all the OTHER members will, after the initial Hubbubb, not be too fuzzed about one member dropping out . Or at least not allow the very same member who endagers a lot of very important work - and Lifes in the course btw. - by ill advised actions to reform the WHO to its own liking .
.
The last time the WHO was snubbed by a certain member state, that state failed to make proper PCR SARS Cov 2 kits, instead of just buying them from WHO.
And now that state is racking up 2500 deaths a day, and is slowly taking over the global share of infection with over 1/4 total known cases.
Karma follows bad decisions. Or, at least perfectly predictable consequences do.
Now, confronted with the evidence of their own folly, they want to pull out, to blame the WHO.
It is too late to pull out, , isn't it?
.
The last time the WHO was snubbed by a certain member state, that state failed to make proper PCR SARS Cov 2 kits, instead of just buying them from WHO.
And now that state is racking up 2500 deaths a day, and is slowly taking over the global share of infection with over 1/4 total known cases.
Karma follows bad decisions. Or, at least perfectly predictable consequences do.
Now, confronted with the evidence of their own folly, they want to pull out, to blame the WHO.
It is too late to pull out, , isn't it?
My brother coined a word for this thronging of crowds and panic buying in shops, he calls it "Chimping", as in to behave like a bunch of sub 90 IQ chimps (apparently 84-90 is about 1 in 10 of the pop.).
See, if supermarkets raised prices to regulate demand of these items, there would be fewer to no wasted journeys to the grocer to buy a loaf. I prefer to spend money to save shoeleather/time, than spend shoeleather to save money. Fortunately I've a years supply of bogroll from 2019 (I've always bought in bulk).
Something like that. I think we have to realise --and let's not be precious about this-- that there are those unfortunate souls in any society, who either will not or cannot work for whatever reason, or, are practically unemployable (because they frighten the horses, children and old folks as they insist on living lives on hard mode) - we just have to accept that and support them ethically and humanely with dignity and fulfilling lives as possible.
Incidentally people are astonished to discover that I have been out of work for a total of 30 years. No, I'm not joking.
Pretty good Interview with Germany's Secretary of Health, Mr. Jens Spahn, by CNBC, broadcast on Monday I think . His english could use some work, but I am generally pleased with his representation of my home country . Good Information .
p.s.: This guy was deputy Secretary of Finances prior to his current job . Lucky us .
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=229Fi8fOtho
I've been following JBPs academic lecture output since 2015 with his Harvard and Canadian TVO days, saw his live lecture in Manchester onAugust 2018, and have his textbook Maps Of Meaning and his 12 Rules book. I posit he's the most significant mythic and psychoanalytic thinker since Joseph Campbell and Jung.
Ah, every day a schoolday - makes sense. Depending on the strain, I assume and constitution of the person...?
as in to behave like a bunch of sub 90 IQ chimps (apparently 84-90 is about 1 in 10 of the pop.).
these days it would be politically correct to call them asymptomatically smart
In the Netherlands the last two weeks the total national mortality is roughly twice the norm. Directly or indirectly COVID19 killed as many people as all other causes combined. And that is despite a massive drop in traffic incidents, crime statistics and so on due to the measures taken to slow the spread. Last year the flu was a relatively small blip. The year before that it was one of the worst flu seasons here in many, many years. COVID19 absolutely dwarfs it. Despite all the measures taken. It is good to be critical, it always is. And there is a lot of misinformation floating around, either by accident or sometimes on purpose. But we can safely stop comparing this with the flu at this point.
What the best path to take is now? That is very, very hard. You have the 'objective' elements: what will happen regarding the number of fatalities given each scenario? How will individuals and groups respond to each scenario? What is the likelihood of compliance, and what are the consequences when compliance drops below certain threshold? What are the economic consequences of each scenario? All of this is based on extraordinarily complex models, each with a healthy margin of error, applied in a context of a scope and complexity rarely seen before. And when all the virologists, chemists, doctors, sociologists and econometricians have run their models you have the 'subjective' parts where the cultural, societal, legal and political spheres all weigh in on the matter.
I dont know what the answer is. But I do know that ignoring the crisis for the sake of the economy will have consequences that are on a completely different scale than the flu. And on the other hand a 18 month lockdown is simply not going to have anywhere near the required level of compliance without going full police-state, even if it was financially possible to do so, which it is not. We'll have to find a middle road, and even the smallest nuances will influence the number of people who will die, and the economy for many, many years to come.
Very droll, M'Lud.
Well I posit that, especially for men, they thrive on and need something greater than themselves to work toward, to be of utility to someone or something,
a burden of responsibility to carry up the hill as it were. A mission in life. Having nothing to do, being useful to nobody or something noble (even noble in small ways I'm not talking of creating a Sistine chapel ceiling) is a ghastly state of affairs to be in, rudderless empty lives.
But anyhow, on Work, I like Work and career, yet I have still yet to get off the ground onto the first rung of the first job of the career ladder. I'm 48 now so I have 18 years to do this. Some folk are unwilling to get their finger out though and I think it is important not to be a Bum, as they say in the USA. You got to maintain your dignity.
Here's the rub for many men in the UK above 25 who are competing with under 25s for starter entry level jobs - they're getting passed over for 18-24 yolds because you can pay them less, what's even more bizarre is because people on entry level jobs are taxed so much, when you do enter employment, you are actually monetarily worse off.
The grads and students hoover up all the entry level gigs.
How's that for crazy?
The welfare trap, you're better off monetarily on Welfare than in entry level employment in UK, at £6.45 to £8,72 per hour for a 40 hour week.
Once boys' and men's challenges are clear, the question 'why now' quickly becomes 'why didn't we see this sooner?' The answer? Virtually every society that survived did so by socializing its sons to be disposable.
Men's competitive team sports focus on the balance between individual achievement and team achievement with the emphasis on team achievement.
In our society, the sound of men complaining is like nails on a chalkboard.
You do make a strong case for slashing welfare and sadly it’s potentially going to get even worse when they have to start increasing taxes of those still in a job to cover everyone who has lost theirs, as well as also trying and pay off the mountain of debt that is accruing...
The welfare trap, you're better off monetarily on Welfare than in entry level employment in UK, at £6.45 to £8,72 per hour for a 40 hour week.
Yep, its one of the modern mysteries to me that - no matter what! - everyone is expected to "work" . This is not a subject of ideology, but practicality .
Well I posit that, especially for men, they thrive on and need something greater than themselves to work toward, to be of utility to someone or something,
a burden of responsibility to carry up the hill as it were. A mission in life. Having nothing to do, being useful to nobody or something noble (even noble in small ways I'm not talking of creating a Sistine chapel ceiling) is a ghastly state of affairs to be in, rudderless empty lives.
You do make a strong case for slashing welfare
Perhaps we should all quit work and be better off
Did we not realise that if you grant humans key control over the most fundamental biologic functions, it may not turn out the way we'd like?
Men on Strike: Why Men Are Boycotting Marriage, Fatherhood, and the American Dream—and Why It Matters
Can you name what this elephant is?
It's never too late to pull out.
The last time the WHO was snubbed by a certain member state, that state failed to make proper PCR SARS Cov 2 kits, instead of just buying them from WHO.
And now that state is racking up 2500 deaths a day, and is slowly taking over the global share of infection with over 1/4 total known cases.
Karma follows bad decisions. Or, at least perfectly predictable consequences do.
Now, confronted with the evidence of their own folly, they want to pull out, to blame the WHO.
It is too late to pull out, , isn't it?
A core component of traditional work ethic is that labor, in of itself, is possessed of some sort of virtue, distinct from the product of that labor. This line of thinking tends to be perpetuated by whoever happens to be in power, to keep those under them busy.
[...]
I am the Spirit that denies! And rightly too; for all that doth begin Should rightly to destruction run; 'Twere better then that nothing were begun. Thus everything that you call Sin, Destruction - in a word, as Evil represent- That is my own, real element. |
Hindsight is always 20/20.