ANNOUNCEMENT Elite Dangerous: Odyssey Announcement

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.

zimms

zimms
I was looking around the web to see if some news outlets got extra bit of info, didn't find much yet but here's what I saw:

New(?) concept art on Playm.de
Dw2elW9.jpg

Another concept art on 4players.de
xC7FtjM.jpg

Some news (or misunderstanding?) from Gamestar.de
[...] Während ihr in Star Citizen so beispielsweise auch Raumstationen und gar das Innere der Raumschiffe erkunden könnt, dürfen sich Elite-Spieler erst einmal nur auf den Planeten selbst die Beine vertreten. Ein großer Schritt ist das dennoch. [...]
Click to expand...
translation mine said:
[...] While you are able to, for instance, explore space stations or even the inside of the ships in Star Citizen, Elite players will only be able to stretch their legs on planets for the time being. Nonetheless a big step forwards. [...]
Click to expand...
 

tequila_tibbs

T
Maggie_Oz said:
Ok. Can you see though that maybe they have decided PvP is where they want it to be?
If you don't really know of anything you need implemented, perhaps they are right?
Click to expand...
cmom lmao pvp is not in a good place, that everyone can agree on. and its long overdue some attention.
ive already said what i think is needed in a general way , the specifics is down to the dev team. which is what i have said.
would bve nice if this dlc was focused on pvp for a change
 

[PS4] Filthymick420

[PS4] Filthymick420
TheLawful said:
Far from that. Scratch LEP, put in VR. If LEPers can quote an old Braben interview on proposed game features over and over again, I can do even more so because the game was actually marketed as a VR title when I bought it. Besides, entitlement is a very subjective thing. Only you know whether you have it or not. I feel entitled to ask for an answer on the VR question, and that is the truth! 😇

faZJVZf.png


O7,
🙃
Click to expand...
Like i said tell it to the console crowd who have never been given the option. You are NOT entitled to answers. They are NOT required to continue supporting VR
 

Rat Catcher

Rat Catcher
tequila_tibbs said:
its as if you guys just cannot tolerate what im saying. as if the very idea of dev time focussed on pvp is unthinkable to you
Click to expand...
I'd be totally behind the Devs spending time giving PvP meaning, you know what I mean, say a dedicated area, maybe just like San Tu, and dedicated ships perfectly balanced to pay against each other, each with their own strengths and weaknesses...

Oh, they already did just that, and the PvP'ers don't like it as the TTK is too short... and they can't take their 20 minute to kill ships there to be bored spitless exactly as they are in the main game...
 

Maggie_Oz

Maggie_Oz
tequila_tibbs said:
cmom lmao pvp is not in a good place, that everyone can agree on. and its long overdue some attention.
ive already said what i think is needed in a general way , the specifics is down to the dev team. which is what i have said.
would bve nice if this dlc was focused on pvp for a change
Click to expand...

All you mentioned thought were "op' ships, which to be fair everyone can have.
and Instancing and I'm not sure what that is. What else is there to move it to a good place?
 

[PS4] Filthymick420

[PS4] Filthymick420
Wayland Pentonville said:
I'd be totally behind the Devs spending time giving PvP meaning, you know what I mean, say a dedicated area, maybe just like San Tu, and dedicated ships perfectly balanced to pay against each other, each with their own strengths and weaknesses...

Oh, they already did just that, and the PvP'ers don't like it as the TTK is too short... and they can't take their 20 minute to kill ships there to be bored spitless exactly as they are in the main game...
Click to expand...
CQC is fun
 

tequila_tibbs

T
Wayland Pentonville said:
I'd be totally behind the Devs spending time giving PvP meaning, you know what I mean, say a dedicated area, maybe just like San Tu, and dedicated ships perfectly balanced to pay against each other, each with their own strengths and weaknesses...

Oh, they already did just that, and the PvP'ers don't like it as the TTK is too short... and they can't take their 20 minute to kill ships there to be bored spitless exactly as they are in the main game...
Click to expand...
ah i see you must be a regular experienced pvper with such an accurate description. its defo the bears asking for ttk to be reduced lmao
 

[PS4] Filthymick420

[PS4] Filthymick420
Maggie_Oz said:
All you mentioned thought were "op' ships, which to be fair everyone can have.
and Instancing and I'm not sure what that is. What else is there to move it to a good place?
Click to expand...
Everyone cant necessarily have the same engineering. Base game only owners cant engineer the metas and are not comparable. Personally i dont see why people cant either choose to like something or not and instead find the need to push their wants on others
 

Iskariot

Iskariot
tequila_tibbs said:
its as if you guys just cannot tolerate what im saying. as if the very idea of dev time focussed on pvp is unthinkable to you
Click to expand...

I do not mind good PvP for the PvP-ers, but my personal worries lie elsewhere.
PvP always is very superficial, mostly pew pew oriented, and the game already suffers from a lack of depth as it is.
 

tequila_tibbs

T
Maggie_Oz said:
All you mentioned thought were "op' ships, which to be fair everyone can have.
and Instancing and I'm not sure what that is. What else is there to move it to a good place?
Click to expand...
see below
tequila_tibbs said:
my perspective is that i would like the dev time to be focused on pvp for this dlc
PP would be much more pvp orientated if it was open only as they intended originally. but we know what happened there.
RE what pvp gameplay? the wonderful thing about pvp is that you just need the right tools and envrnoment and a bit of incentive and the gameplay is created. but that requires serious dev time. which is what im saying would be good in light of all the pve focused patchhes weve had
Click to expand...
 

LKx

L
Feet on the ground (pun intended), what we'll probably get:

  • "space legs" on the ground
  • fps weapons and related missions
  • barren atmospheric landings
  • no ELWs
  • no gas giants and water worlds (maybe late in the "season")
  • no ships insides and zero-g activities (maybe very late in the "season")
  • no stations insides wandering (maybe very very late in the "season")

still GREAT!
 

Maggie_Oz

Maggie_Oz
tequila_tibbs said:
its defo the bears asking for ttk to be reduced lmao
Click to expand...

OK that does put some things in perspective. Giving people labels is a really poor approach to a cooperative environment

Filthymick420 said:
Everyone cant necessarily have the same engineering.
Click to expand...

If it's important to them, they can

Iskariot said:
PvP always is very superficial, mostly pew pew oriented, and the game already suffers from a lack of depth as it is.
Click to expand...
Depth which can be added fairly easily.
I would love it if I could have full on combat pilots in their ships provide escort to be in cargo runs on missions and community goals
BUT, just a like a real fighter pilot, most of your missions will not see any activity. As most of you have ground billions out of mining you lose a lot of interest in the activities of the game and that isn't surprising.
Elite Dangerous is a game you to need to put effort into to get enjoyment out of, not just sit passively and complain that the Dev's haven't put in the specific thing you just thought of, or didn't think of more often
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom