It means that you have been poisoned by years of SC theorycrafting to assume that just because A is mentioned, we can skip over steps B through F and immediately assume that G comes as a logical consequence, even though those intermediary steps are leaps of logic you made rather than anything that is inherent in the original statement. This over-interpretation has become such a mainstay in backer's response to whatever they say that CI¬G have come to incorporate in their hype machine: hint at something insignificant and pointless, and everyone will immediately compete to out-over-interpret each other and send the hype (and ship sales) through the roof. All with minimal effort, and all while maintaining the “but we never said…” excuse for when the theorycrafted outcomes invariably fail to materialise.
But just because this is standard practice with anything that comes out of CI¬G doesn't mean that you should apply the same rules to everyone else. Hell, you shouldn't even apply it to CI¬G, quite the opposite: it has been proven pretty safe to assume that if CI¬G says something, it's bovine droppings, but it would probably be a bit much to ask to break those years of conditioning…
Anyway, the tl;dr of it is quite simple:
If someone says you'll be able to do X, assume that it means you will able to do X. Not Y, or Z, or FQ — just X. And consider the possibility that you might actually already be able to do this and they're just using a pre-existing feature to make it sound like something new is happening.
If CI¬G says you'll be able to do X, assume that it means you most likely won't be able to do X. And consider the fact that, just because something might happen in the future, you should not talk about it as if it already exists in the present.
![[VR] Merkir](https://forums-cdn.zaonce.net/data/avatars/m/141/141091.jpg?1553527154){kind=avatar}
