Game Discussions Star Citizen Discussion Thread v12
- Thread starter Yaffle
- Start date
-
- Tags
- star citizen
Sidenote, CP77 has been officially put back in a 'not released' state by Sony.
So the saviour of PC gaming Star Citizen is good again by being compared to a completely different game on consoles that are, by gaming standards, out of date. What about telling the console owners to upgrade, like SC zealots are quick enough to blame other backers hardware for the crap performance of SC? Do I need to point out again that this game is from a company that never took one penny off me until the game was released. You'll have to do better than that in your blinkered defending of all things Roberts.
Put your hand in your pocket for a change and buy an Idris.
Saving PC gaming has a price: outdated consoles can't keep up
I was just giving a little news related to the meme of StuartGT. I don't know what he tries to say with this meme, just ask him.
The meme essentially states: 'Cyberpunk bad doesn't = Star Citizen good'
An aspect you are continually missing while sharing random Cyberpunk travails on this here Star Citizen thread.
Fun thing is CIG aren't bound to ultimatums (apart from their own self imposed they happily never respect) yet they can't help but crunch, work over the weekend, release on Friday or right before holidays.
but it is released and works fine on PC. The same can not be said for SC.
As Holy Roberts said, his employees should be Americans, not American'ts. So this is perfectly natural order of things at CI-G.
Already done! "What did you expect from 7-year old hardware" is the motto. Well, maybe they expected something like GTAV, TLOU, Horizon Zero Dawn, RDR2, TLOU2, Spiderman, I dunno. All these games worked fine on last-gen consoles, with better-than-CP2077 graphics, decent (for a console game) performance, and did not crashed every 20-30 minutes.
Nah, let's stay with Playstation. Sony not only pulled the game from the store, but offered a refund for any buyer that wants it.
Because CDPR had clearly stated that they maybe fix the bugs in console versions, but the overall graphics and, most importantly, performance - will not improve. Applying the same to CI-G and SC, as whiteknighters do, means that SC maybe will get rid of bugs, but it will not improve. No SSOCS, iCache, Server Meshing or any other magic word will change a thing.
CI-G, being a publisher itself, should do exactly the same thing Sony did: pull the SC from the Pledge Store and offer refunds for all backers that ask for it. Because SC sucks as a game even if we take its bugs off the table.
This is the way.
Last edited:
How can anyone not see this as an intentional lie?
Last edited:
it was established a couple of months ago that @La doesn't lie. Even when he replaces "removing from store" with "put back in a 'not released'".
Meanwhile, there is new merchandise for thargoid lovers. It's a steal! (pun intended)
NSFW gun pikk!
And some fun from SA:
And if you crawl, it even works! Pay respects for elevator panel!
Last edited:
Which company said this was fixed seven months ago?Learn to spot the difference. NPC are 'on' chair in SC and 'in' chair in CP77
I mean, it's the natural evolution of the thing, isn't it? Ant cannot for the life of him come up with anything remotely positive to say about SC so he must at all cost post nothing but off-topic nonsense, and when that inevitably fails to paint SC in a positive light, his only way out is to ramp it up to outright lying. This will of course also not SC in a positive light, but what else can he do?
Nah, I just said having some evidence of poor faith argument / deliberate misrepresentation always helps. Rather than just casting every misguided backer belief as a deliberate attempt to distort reality. Sometimes they genuinely just don't know what they're talking about
(Ant's latest example is a lot closer to wilful misrepresentation though for sure
)
Oooh, that's a funny one.
Love how they list the things coming next year at the end. Pretty sure those were things people were thinking they were getting this year. They did miss salvage though! That's usually on ever prediction for the coming year.
Quotes of course are golden.
Yeah, just imagine. But my money is still on pre-alpha. Who knows, maybe SQ54 will have released.
CIG - COVID hasn't affected us significantly. Not sure why people keep talking about covid slowing them down when CIG says it didn't.
Yes, sure, CIG should throw out yet another thing they promised. That will reinforce their image of being a trustworthy company. Perhaps if they refunded everyone for their SQ42 pledges.
Some humour as well
Oooh, an optimist
Bemused by this one
Umm.... so he knows how bad it has been, but its nice to pretend it hasn;t?
Early days.
I think it's not about CP2077 by itself, only about the shadow it casts over the SC development. By some twist of logic SC whiteknighters find CP2077 absolving the sins of SC, CI-G and Holy Roberts himself. Like "oh, look, it was in development for 8 years, twice as long as SC", "all the bugs will be squashed in two days before the release, you will see", "oh, they weren't? This is why CRobber should take even more
CP2077 is not the subject, it's just a means to justify the sorry state of SC.