Haha!I'm in Florida. It's may it's sunny and hot, and will be until around Christmas.
Living in Lancashire it'll be Sunny & hot for about 25mins some time in August

Haha!I'm in Florida. It's may it's sunny and hot, and will be until around Christmas.
Sadly this is the real tragedy... it could have been so good, could have been a roaring success. It robbed us of celebrating it because as it stands i can't enjoy the good that is under the surface until someone's cleaned the crap off it first and disinfected it. They've missed the wave, like a surfer sat at the peak..we should be up and riding and whooping with joy!
Please explain to me how an adult who just spent money on a defective product and expresses their opinion on said defective product is selfish and childish?But you know it's not going to stay that way for very long and that it's going to change, so it's very much NOT the time to post a review. A few weeks in, yes, but not in the first 24 hours. That just takes me back to the point about these people being selfish and childish.
My brother moved down here from Boston a few years ago. I remember his first January here, it was supposed to get pretty cold on a Friday night. I told him that's our winter. One Friday night in January.Haha!
Living in Lancashire it'll be Sunny & hot for about 25mins some time in August![]()
Personallty, I'm a simple man. If I see a negative obsidian ant post about EDO I just want to want to watched random puppies being silly on YT. I want to love this game ! Give me a reason!
The only problem is that after all the issues and sorted and things will have settled down, the vast majority of those negative reviews will still be there, with Frontier unable to have recoursethat hurts both the game and the current player base.
That doesn't make sense. Steam as an example bifurcates reviews into recent reviews and all time. This gives the publisher the option to improve the title over time and redeeming themselves.The only problem is that after all the issues and sorted and things will have settled down, the vast majority of those negative reviews will still be there, with Frontier unable to have recoursethat hurts both the game and the current player base.
dont forget the dumpster fire.. like the OP's commentThis whole thread is a mistake, but it has reminded me I’ve got to put the rubbish out![]()
I'd say that's exactly the time you post a review, especially when you pay $40.I'm not defending Frontier, I just think that if something is clearly broken, that's not the time to post a review.
Some of us payed $60 for alpha access too. It was more salt in the wound.Not sure where you saw the people saying this is what Odyssey was always going to be, but I think it's pretty understandable that people weren't happy with a £40 expansion, which was advertised as a finished product being released in this state.
Nice hyperbole and passive aggressiveness though.
Indeed. When all the bugs are fixed and all the core engines are finished, Odyssey will be closer to a technical demo than a game. And as impressive as its technical aspect is, as a game it is very disappointing.even if you subtract the bugs and poor programming... it would still have a boring (non-existant) foot exploration mechanic, little to no variety in foot missions/activity, and little integration with non-foot gameplay with foot gameplay and fps gameplay that seems to anger fps players with slow and constant weapon swapping.
at best you have something to start with. and the very real concern that that is all it will ever be if we go by history.
this has been getting worked on for over a year and it looks like it needs way more than that to be something that would get the attention in a positive way to the level that it got in a negative way,.. even just from its players.
I dont believe that you have not seen any real issues. That doesnt make sense, and I would be able to 1) document and 2) reproduce your environment on my own to see what you see. By now, the specifics of what hardware profile and/or software profile was required to improve the game would be well known and published, and we wouldnt be having this interaction.I have played it, but I'm one of the lucky ones who's had no real issues. I'm just disheartened by the fact that people have to post their immediate reaction as reviews of the game, less than two or three days after release. Yes, it was botched, but does that justify posting a very permanent and very negative review online? How many of these dumbasses are going to update their reviews when Odyssey does improve? Probably only a single figure percentage I'd guess. How does that help the game and the player community?![]()
what if it dose not change?But you know it's not going to stay that way for very long and that it's going to change, so it's very much NOT the time to post a review. A few weeks in, yes, but not in the first 24 hours. That just takes me back to the point about these people being selfish and childish.
I bought an alt account copy of Odyssey, posted a negative review, and then refunded it - just on account of this thread.![]()