You took the words right out of my mouth thereThe end result certainly supports that, in my mind. I can't remember very many times where I've seen a show version of something where I've found myself thinking "nailed it!" that many times.
You took the words right out of my mouth thereThe end result certainly supports that, in my mind. I can't remember very many times where I've seen a show version of something where I've found myself thinking "nailed it!" that many times.
you heard true. It is entirely a way of Neil honouring STP (including season 2 which Neil had the only surviving notes for the sequel book)I think a lot of it was down to Gaiman himself... As Mr Pratchett could not be there to advise, Neil took it on his shoulders to make sure that the adaptation was as truthful to the original as can be expected in a screenplay. He was definitely instrumental in stating that if they tried to mess with it in any way, or tried to remove any of Pratchett's work, he would have been happy to pull the plug...
Or so I heard...
I was going to ask about that... I thought there was only one book!!! (I wasn't aware there were any notes for a second!)you heard true. It is entirely a way of Neil honouring STP (including season 2 which Neil had the only surviving notes for the sequel book)
they were sort of ultra top triple elite secret for a long time, and the condition on them being used was basically if the bbc series worked...I was going to ask about that... I thought there was only one book!!! (I wasn't aware there were any notes for a second!)
Interesting times indeed!!
Now that I think about it: One of the sillier complaints in the Amazon reviews (although I was not in the slightest surprised that some twits who'd completely failed to understand it would whine about it) was that Aziraphael was "too gay".You took the words right out of my mouth there![]()
Fair enough. They must have hated the book as well, then. Thing is, some of those clowns claimed that it wasn't true to the original and only some sort of BBC conspiracy, blah, blah, bleh.most people who watch something, dont care about what a previous version of that thing was. they're just going to judge it on it's own.
it was a Neil and Terry conspiracy that was being worked on even before STP sadly passed awayFair enough. They must have hated the book as well, then. Thing is, some of those clowns claimed that it wasn't true to the original and only some sort of BBC conspiracy, blah, blah, bleh.
Fair enough. They must have hated the book as well, then. Thing is, some of those clowns claimed that it wasn't true to the original and only some sort of BBC conspiracy, blah, blah, bleh.
Comes down to teaching your children about boundaries. How do you do that without actually having a boundary your kids can actually decide of their own free will to cross. If you put them in a padded room until they grow up (apart from you getting arrested) they will never know that fire can burn. Once they did, they learned another valuable lesson - consequences!I get a feeling we're talking shop now, which, although I can do so endlessly (much to the chagrin of anybody around me) is entirely too serious so...
Can anybody explain to me why G-d made a perfect Eden, telling Adam and Eve they could have anything there, only they could't touch THAT particular tree and then expect them to not immediately go for it? I mean, He does know us humans better than anybody, right?
Edit: I'm a Christian. I just always wondered about this![]()
Didn't know this existed! Will ferret this one out for sure... And Natalie Dormer as Door - perfect! (Possibly one of the loveliest ladies to grace the planet in my books...)Oh! I would totally recommend the Dirk Maggs radio play version of Neverwhere
Comes down to teaching your children about boundaries. How do you do that without actually having a boundary your kids can actually decide of their own free will to cross. If you put them in a padded room until they grow up (apart from you getting arrested) they will never know that fire can burn. Once they did, they learned another valuable lesson - consequences!
That's very true, but it leaves the fun out of it, which is terribly off topicComes down to teaching your children about boundaries. How do you do that without actually having a boundary your kids can actually decide of their own free will to cross. If you put them in a padded room until they grow up (apart from you getting arrested) they will never know that fire can burn. Once they did, they learned another valuable lesson - consequences!
That's just the Void speaking. You must be terribly much fun at partiesalso comes down to the story is fiction written by someone with an imagination that had to deal with not knowing how anything in the real world actually worked with a population that is a fraction of today's so nobody was there to tell them their story sucked.
if we are going down the archeology and anthropology of religion route, I could (and have done) write sizeable essaysThat's very true, but it leaves the fun out of it, which is terribly off topic
Doesn't mean you're wrong, though![]()
That's just the Void speaking. You must be terribly much fun at parties![]()
Ah - but the fun is imagining that first conversation between the two of them after getting chucked out of Eden...That's very true, but it leaves the fun out of it, which is terribly off topic
Doesn't mean you're wrong, though![]()
Ah - but the fun is imagining that first conversation between the two of them after getting chucked out of Eden...