As far as I remember not so, other trolling kind of "find the loophole" stuff is hard, but straight weapons damage is other thing. And for trolls there are simpler ways with dealing them. Get reported enough and get a ban.
To Solo Play Players: If You Could Disable PVP, Would You Play in Open Play Mode Instead?
- Thread starter AMX-008 GaZowmn
- Start date
I moved to Eurasia from the original Mobius group when that got too big. It feels emptier, and it's been a nuisance because some of my Mobius friends stayed behind or ended up in different groups.
I've also noted some people saying that they've been thrown out of Mobius for no reason and with no appeal. A proper Open-PvE mode would be a huge improvement.
Of course it's occurred to some of us that you might do that. If you did it to me I'd add you to block; I'd then find more amusement in the improved game experience.
Attack whoever you like, it's all valid gameplay. So is choosing who to play with.
.
Last edited:
You're being incredibly arrogant with this. You don't get to decide what someone else would consider a worthwhile improvement in their experience.
They're just mad because their pay to win station got ganked by a handful of fighters
.
Last edited:
Except it does not. Because certain unwanted element is missing. For good.
OK, let me spell it out once more.
Open-PvE would be better than Mobius because:
- There would be no group size limit.
- There wouldn't be fragmentation over several groups - PvE players could all potentially meet in the mode.
- The mode would be shown on the game launcher so new players would know about it.
- It would be administered by FD, not an unaccountable group of private players. Anyone could join. Anyone chucked out could appeal to support. (If it was hard-coded this would probably never arise).
Last edited:
.
Last edited:
And at that point we have co-op play without possibility of somebody coming in to troll up. Say like distant worlds, but no distant ganks.
Personally I would more like robust C&P steering certain playstyles to where they belong. But OpenPVE would be good alternative.
I am wondering why you still deal with this toxic players here. They did contribute nothing to the original question of this thread. Just keep repeating why ganking is a legitimate gameplay. That does not bring one single player to open.
I do have one expection to block the ganker rule myself. Inhabited anarchies.
At those systems getting attacked by the somebody rp:ing psychomurderer does not break immersion.
I see nothing has changed in Hotel California since I've been away. Same old narrative, same empty fish barrel.
Why does that not surprise me?
Are people still thinking Sandro is going to come save the day for PvP any minute now, too? Still whinging about the BGS, etc.?
How many years has it been now?
Sigh. There aren't "solo players" and "open players". Anyone can play in whatever mode they like for any game session. No-one has an option that another person doesn't. This is the very definition of fairness.
.
Last edited:
Robert Maynard
Volunteer Moderator
Apart from console players without premium platform access, of course - they can't play in either of the multi-player game modes.
Yeah, I for example choose my mode according to: Do I actually care what happens in my play session