quality forum replyNo jabs from No Man's sky this time ?
quality forum reply
No jabs from No Man's sky this time ?
Sorry to disappoint you mate, i guessed a long time content creator could stomach some form of criticism.
Or you were expecting slowclaps only ?
Your criticism isn't clear. I assume you are disappointed by the lack of No Man's Sky references, and would prefer to see more of that in Yamiks' videos?
Funny you should say that... at first the "beyond" (NMS) update felt like coincidence, but after mentioning it to some of the devs in LaveCon... i got the feeling it was a bit more than that and they (ED devs) felt the same way (that NMS was throwing shade). That got me thinking in the 1st place.Does he really beliveve that No Man's sky devs make references to Elite Dangerous naming their game updates after something present in ED ? And if they do, they do it to "throw jabs" to Fdev ?
Editing to add that i'm hoping you are not asking because you want do defend Yamicks.
First because i think that he can clearly defend itself, if he wants.
Second because knowing what kind of quality content you offer us, you are the last one i can expect doing that.
Funny you should say that... at first the "beyond" (NMS) update felt like coincidence, but after mentioning it to some of the devs in LaveCon... i got the feeling it was a bit more than that and they (ED devs) felt the same way (that NMS was throwing shade). That got me thinking in the 1st place.
Also.. funny that you choose to go off-topic here ..isn't like the forum-dad community here all about talking about the topic at hand? or am I just mistaking forums for something else? =}
I'm not even sure why Yamiks need defending in the first place. I was just asking if you wanted to elaborate on your statement, as it was totally unclear. It's nice of you to share your thoughts on his video though. Not that I agree, but opinions are great like that.
I was so upset from that video you made, for the reasons i wrote, that i responded that way hoping to trigger a discussion about that video with you. In my opinion you always made great quality content, that' why i found that particular piece of work so childish and underwhelming.
I was considering SLFs actually.. issue was : they're too different to include among normal shipsYamiks You forgot about SLF's just imagine that heavily spinning GU-97
I lol'd heavily at the Keelback 2:20
A tongue in cheek approach was taken. See as much as everyone says "oooooooh this X game cant be compared to my fanboyed Y game" FACT here is : that a team of developers equali in size of what ED has working on CURRENT updates can do better work in quality of life & new content, that it just puts ED people to shame ... that in grand scale of things was the point + of course that they do allegedly throw jabs at ED.
When it comes to ED development I've always stated that no matter how big or small the team is : you can make meaningful changes and as long as its DONE WELL there is no reason to say it's bad. But the september update.. and updates before just makes you soo depressed when not only new microtransactions are put in game(THAT YOU PAID ALREADY FOR), but that just breaks the game in small...or big way till the SLOW patch is made.
The underlying theme here's : "look at this team and their results. They did it the right way, and look at this other team who seem to do nothing ..or just mess things up."
It's commentary of the current state of things really.