3 life worlds, 2 habbitable, one already terrestrial, but not colonizable?

[kenwshmt]

This impressed me as odd today.

2 of the 'no life' worlds are terraform candidates, but the one with life on it and a water world, isn't?

 

[Poseidal]

It can be a water world that is too cold (or hot, but generally cold) for human life but not for other forms of life that are better adapted outdoor. Because of the location, it is not possible to terraform it into a world that is fit for human life as to get the pressure liveable, it may drop to temperatures that are too low.

 

[Nilt]

It can be a water world that is too cold (or hot, but generally cold) for human life but not for other forms of life that are better adapted outdoor. Because of the location, it is not possible to terraform it into a world that is fit for human life as to get the pressure liveable, it may drop to temperatures that are too low.

Exactly. It's outside the habitable zone of its star, thus not transformable.

 

[kenwshmt]

but 'water' by its name means its in the habital temperature range, otherwise its an 'ice' world.

 

[Nilt]

but 'water' by its name means its in the habital temperature range, otherwise its an 'ice' world.

There's a little more to it than that, though. It might have an atmosphere that's just too toxic, for example.

 

[kenwshmt]

56% co2.. but isnt that the point of 'terra forming'?

 

[gumbie]

but 'water' by its name means its in the habital temperature range, otherwise its an 'ice' world.

Spoiler

 

[Kancro Vantas]

OP, can you post the stats of the three planets? That would help to figure it out. Thanks.

 

[Whiterose]

Spoiler

http://i.imgur.com/v8FRvrI.png

Nice graph, I cant rep you any more though.