Anaconda VS Federal Corvette

I can't really comment on the Corvette or the Cutter yet - I've not made the rank to unlock them, but I'll get there.
I do fly an Anaconda though, and aside from the somewhat disorienting bridge placement (I still bang my head once in a while going through mail slots), I rather like flying it.
I'm sure the other Big Two will provide their own form of enjoyment. As it looks like the Cutter will be the last ship I buy (at a little over 770m to outfit the way I want) before I take it off into the black, never to be seen again, I'm sure it will be quite some time before I can really comment on it.
 
Shield emitters are a property of the vessel itself, the shield generator simply powers them.

Likewise, drives are a property of the vessel itself, the module simply provides the motive power...it doesn't vector the thrust or determine the nozzels used, etc.



The current Anaconda has a very strong and light weight composite hull as befits a long range high-end transport vessel, providing high integrity, but inferior hull hardness.

I like it! And it makes sense.
Are you guessing/presuming or is this based in fact (lore)?
 
I have extensively flown each of the big 3 for months. Both before and after engineers released. Honestly, unless im in a CZ, i prefer an Anaconda

The Anaconda can do anything the Corvette or Cutter can do almost as well but without any of the major disadvantages of the other 2.
 
Clearly a lot of the Vette's extra mass must be coming from what's essentially built-in shield boosters and engine turbo chargers.

I like your answer in that way , it appeals to my logical sense. There are a lot of things in Elite we accept on the face of it (FTL, Flight model and so forth) and that is all fine and dandy, we have to , else no game.
But doing the Ship and outfitting juggle is a bit different, when we build ships and equip them with standard modules, we expect these modules to have the same characteristics, ie a power plant delivers 30 MW of energy and weighs 60 T. Period. It should logically do that in all ships where it can be fitted. Logically and appealing to common sense. I'll buy that as an Engineer myself.
Where things starts to muddy, is when as my example illustrated you have to accept an behaviour of the module that defies logical thinking and common sense. (I am not talking Modding here).
In my example Both the Thruster and Shield Generator behaves in a radical different way, for no apparent reason. (Cmdr's StiTch and Morbad gave some "reasonable" explanations to these factual behaviours, game wise at least). But as an Engineer I find it difficult to accept an incidence that defies what my Calculator (HP 48 GX) tells me is the truth.
This would not worry me, if the whole putting on modules was handled in a way like the RNG Engineers do stuff, then it would be believeable, but as it is FD have tried to make the module fitting "Logical", ie take the same ship, grade up or down the module and the result is logical. Fair enough. But put it on another ship, it might as well be a completely different module :S .
Cmdr bubbabenali points to the "discrepansies" in armour, well that is not so hard to swallow, different materials used in manufacture so forth... (Unless you apply the fact that, the ship built explicitly for a military purpose has got a weaker armor !?! Logic defying :rolleyes:)
Well it puzzzles me and I should let it go, and play instead, but I am having a hard time doing that :D
I think that the Cmdr's working on mapping module behaviour, strengths, benefits and characteristics are doing a tremendous job, I wonder how they deal wit this...
Handwavium, Unobtainium, Boosterium...?

TL.DR I have acceptance problems.

Cheers Cmdr's
 
Last edited:
Kornelius did a 12 minute comparison of the flight characteristics of the big 3 a while back. I found it quite interesting, though it did remove any incentive I had for grinding ranks and replaced it with an "I'll get there when I get there" attitude.


[video=youtube;v8rluqzeOkc]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v8rluqzeOkc[/video]
 
Last edited:
It's best not to question it. Before you know it, you will be questioning everything for the way it is because none of anything makes any sense.
 
Back
Top Bottom