'Most distant' Solar System object identified:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-34787422
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-34787422
Is it me, but I have a problem visualising billions of km. Why can't they use Ls instead?I make it roughly 51000Ls with some generous rounding, or about 0.5% of a Hutton Orbital trip.
We should petition NASA to start measuring the universe in HOTs - Hutton Orbital Trips![]()
Is it me, but I have a problem visualising billions of km. Why can't they use Ls instead?I make it roughly 51000Ls with some generous rounding, or about 0.5% of a Hutton Orbital trip.
I suppose I have trouble visualising AUs too, other than for Earth vicinity measurements.
Looks like 1 AU = 499 Ls (I think it ok to round to 500). I think I'd prefer Ls over AU.
I know what an AU is, I just don't feel it a good measurement unit for multiple reasons.
Last time I checked, AUs weren't a SI unit.
AU and parsecs are holdovers from how astronomical distances were calculated in the past. Using geometry, it was relatively easy to figure out distances relative to Earth's distance from the Sun, even before people knew how far that distance actually was. But now that we do know Earth's distance from the Sun, we can use a more "universal" measure, especially in a futuristic sci-fi setting. Kinda like star dates in Star Trek. But since there aren't really any aliens in ED (there's Thargoids, but human civ isn't integrated with any aliens), it's a bit more believable that things would still be Earth-centric compared to Star Trek.