Again I think you have misunderstood me for the second time, lol, but no worries, I do write a lot, so some things might get overlooked. I'm not suggesting that Frontier hires more devs, even thought they are perfectly open to the idea as stated by Chantee in a previous thread I created. What I suggested was to allocate a couple of more devs already at frontier and that have experience with the animal models to further bulk the roster in the game. The compromise here would be that future DLCs that are bigger than four animals and commissioned a higher number of resources to create, would cost a little more.
An example, the current Aquatic DLC has 4+1 animals at $9.99 (using the USD price point to simplify it) an alternative DLC that would have included 7 habitat animals plus 2 exhibit ones would not have been an unreachable or unrealistic expectation with a few more resources devoted to it. The price could have been 16.99 usd, an insignificant amount of money for most adults, and children I'm assuming still would have to go thru their parents, so I hardly think that a few dollars more would have made a difference. The game and all its DLCs are still completely undervalued. Maybe the money difference would not have been substantial, but the three extra habitat animals and one exhibit animal would have made a world of differences.
As far as comparing Frontier to grade schoolers or being entitled for suggesting they add more resources to the game at a higher price point, you lost me there, not sure where you got that from, but it is not what I wrote.