Absolutely breathtaking shots. Truly the scope of the universe and magnitude of these events are incomprehensible. What a beauty. Would totally love to see more shots from you, good sir!
right now I have a borrowed DSLR that may have alot of dead pixels in it. Set it up on a tripod the other night and just tried taking some exposures of the night sky to see how they came out. Thought I got some good pictures of some star fields, looked again, and the stars were the same in every picture, lol. But to answer your question, I'd like to get into both.Hi Don,
just don't rush it, it took me 2 Years of try and error.
Whar are you doing? Deepsky or Planetary? CCD or DSLR?
I really like the pictures. I have always been intereste in astrophotography but lack the funds to really get involved.
I know it can be done relatively cheaply these days. The light pollution where I reside obscures a lot of the sky.
Is there a lot of post shot processing in the images?
But what makes you look for "unedited" footage?
Hi!
Using different scopes. For the Andromeda, Horsehead and the Veil it was a 3" F5,6 apochromatic Refractor.
Orionnebula was taken with a 6" F5 Newton-Reflector.
The Crescent with a 10" F5 Newton.
Camera is a Astro-Modified Canon EOS 500D.
Average exposuretime for such pictures is about 3-5 h.
You boys forgot about the 2 best.
Pillars of creation.
http://www.thisiscolossal.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/heic1501a.jpg
http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/j/MSNBC/Components/Photo/_new/120117-coslog-pillars3-320p.photoblog900.jpg
God's eye. / helix nebula.
http://melkimag.fr/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/helix_nebula_3d_space-wide.jpg
http://www.episcopalcafe.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/eye-of-God-nebula.jpg