As title says. And I mean for quanitity, not quality. It seems my anaconda is better than the clipper for this, as I've just learned.
So whats better? Beluga or anaconda?
So whats better? Beluga or anaconda?
You can put more passenger cabins in an Anaconda.
If you like air conditioning, go with an Anaconda. The Beluga runs.....spicy.
However, the Beluga can take luxury passengers while the Annie cannot. For bulk passenger shuffling the Anaconda is where it's at. Plus jump range and shields.
As title says. And I mean for quanitity, not quality. It seems my anaconda is better than the clipper for this, as I've just learned.
So whats better? Beluga or anaconda?
Since I run both... Definitely the Anaconda, hands down.
- it outclasses the Beluga in every single aspect
- offers far more protection
- allows offensive engagement of Hostiles without running high risk of Ejecting Passengers (losing Shields)
- far higher PAX capacity
- doesn't tend to overheat like crazy as the Beluga does (just try charging FSD for a Hyperjump while afterburning in a Beluga, especially when departing a Planet...)
And when it comes to Luxury Cabins... Frankly, out of (checks Stats) 583 Passenger Missions I've flown, not a single one (!) was a Luxury PAX. I hardly ever see those.
Thus, for as long as Luxury Cabins are seemingly useless, the Beluga in my books doesn't hold a single advantage over an Anaconda.
For bulk Passengers, the 1 trip in the Anaconda basically means 2 trips in the Beluga (if you manage to fill the Passenger Cabins of the Conda, that is... Mission System is often way too limited to allow that)
Typical Mission Target when I'm in the Beluga... You really want to risk your PAX ejecting, trying to fight an FdL?
http://www.falconfly.de/temp/ELITE-MSN_Target_Beluga.jpg
In comparison, in the the Anaconda all you'll ever do is scoop up the remains of such Mission Targets...
http://www.falconfly.de/temp/ELITE-MSN_Target_Conda.jpg