Simple question which one do you prefer the novels or movies? I have to say movies since I never read any of the books but if I could get one I would definitely read it.theres a lot of stuff that I heard happens differently like Nedrys death getting explained gruesomely and Muldoon actually surviving the big one without a scratch.
Books or movies
- Thread starter Dinofan300
- Start date
I personally have mixed feelings because I both enjoyed and disliked both, although I suppose the novel wins by little just because of it's detail level and extension (they got to see much more dinosaurs, for instance).
The movie was truly awesome and I absolutely loved the artwork, but I think some extents weren't good choices even if they did work to the story (as for instance that no dinosaur was visible at first through the tour; of course that could happen and it certainly plays to the mess that was the project, but they would have made sure to have them as visible as possible because they were the star attractions so idk).
The novel has pretty much everything portrayed in the movie, but further developed, and some things that were withdrawed to further installments (such as the Aviary, or the mainland dinos).
The movie was truly awesome and I absolutely loved the artwork, but I think some extents weren't good choices even if they did work to the story (as for instance that no dinosaur was visible at first through the tour; of course that could happen and it certainly plays to the mess that was the project, but they would have made sure to have them as visible as possible because they were the star attractions so idk).
The novel has pretty much everything portrayed in the movie, but further developed, and some things that were withdrawed to further installments (such as the Aviary, or the mainland dinos).
Hmm tough one.... but I have to say the books.
The original JP film I can watch anytime any place in any mood and enjoy it. It's a classic for a reason..... but The Lost World was spoiled by the Rex in San Diego thing for me... I mean it's fun don't get me wrong but when you realise how many cool scenes haven't been on-screen yet that were in BOTH novels that was a poor choice for me and more of a Universal/Spielberg stunt just to show off CGI rather than be true to Chricton's stories.... and for me they were good enough not to need flashy gimmicky alterations.
The books meanwhile have so much more depth in terms of the pseudo-science behind the genetic engineering, how Hammond tried to control nature on his island, Malcolm's chaos theory and how it related to the events going on around them....there were more dinos as Alan_Grady mentioned too, juvenile Rex and Triceratops scenes, a boat chase, raptor nests, Muldoon being even more heroic compared to his film appearance, way better death scenes as well..... then in TLW novel the story is more about Biosyn being InGen's rivals and Dodgson being the main arch-villain plus a pair of mysterious Carnotaurs and a raptor motorcycle chase (likely where Trevorrow got the idea from for the first JW film).
The original JP film I can watch anytime any place in any mood and enjoy it. It's a classic for a reason..... but The Lost World was spoiled by the Rex in San Diego thing for me... I mean it's fun don't get me wrong but when you realise how many cool scenes haven't been on-screen yet that were in BOTH novels that was a poor choice for me and more of a Universal/Spielberg stunt just to show off CGI rather than be true to Chricton's stories.... and for me they were good enough not to need flashy gimmicky alterations.
The books meanwhile have so much more depth in terms of the pseudo-science behind the genetic engineering, how Hammond tried to control nature on his island, Malcolm's chaos theory and how it related to the events going on around them....there were more dinos as Alan_Grady mentioned too, juvenile Rex and Triceratops scenes, a boat chase, raptor nests, Muldoon being even more heroic compared to his film appearance, way better death scenes as well..... then in TLW novel the story is more about Biosyn being InGen's rivals and Dodgson being the main arch-villain plus a pair of mysterious Carnotaurs and a raptor motorcycle chase (likely where Trevorrow got the idea from for the first JW film).
Normally I'd say movies since books generally bore me... but as Jurassic Park is one of the few novels I've actually read (never finished Lost World) I must say the book is definitely better.
The movie is just a generic sci-fi thriller like Alien; people get stuck with monster, people die running from monster, survivors escape...
The novel is far deeper and is more of a moral story about human hubris, abusing powers we don't understand, and warning signs being overlooked due to our own ignorance or our willingness to ignore them.
The movie is just a generic sci-fi thriller like Alien; people get stuck with monster, people die running from monster, survivors escape...
The novel is far deeper and is more of a moral story about human hubris, abusing powers we don't understand, and warning signs being overlooked due to our own ignorance or our willingness to ignore them.
Novels for sure.
Novels have a lot more dinosaur involvement in them and you get to see more of the park.
If they ever do a remake that is exactly like the novels i think people would go bonkers with how much better it would be.
As others said the rex in san diego kind of ruined the lost world movie.
Good things from the novels that didnt make it into the movies-
JP: baby raptor playing in nursery, compys on the mainland, juvi rex killing ppl, dinos that climb trees, baby triceratops, stegasaurus being the sick dino, more characters and more inclusion of certain characters like gerry harding and muldoon, rex hunting hadrasaurs, hammond's home, rex swimming and chasing alan and kids on a raft, aviary and pteranadons (i think), muldoon rocket launcher tranqing the rex, see more of the infastructure of the park like the maintenance sheds and underground tunnels, hammond dying from compys...
LW: inclusion of more characters and better new ones, dodgson is back, a lot of time is spent seeing how the dinosaurs behave in their natural enviornment, better kids, the dart guns are actually used, and no rex in san diego scene.
Only downside to the first novel is the ending that seemed rushed to me and it saying costa rica bombed the island afterward to kill the dinosaurs which seemed way too extreme and didnt make much sense.
Novels have a lot more dinosaur involvement in them and you get to see more of the park.
If they ever do a remake that is exactly like the novels i think people would go bonkers with how much better it would be.
As others said the rex in san diego kind of ruined the lost world movie.
Good things from the novels that didnt make it into the movies-
JP: baby raptor playing in nursery, compys on the mainland, juvi rex killing ppl, dinos that climb trees, baby triceratops, stegasaurus being the sick dino, more characters and more inclusion of certain characters like gerry harding and muldoon, rex hunting hadrasaurs, hammond's home, rex swimming and chasing alan and kids on a raft, aviary and pteranadons (i think), muldoon rocket launcher tranqing the rex, see more of the infastructure of the park like the maintenance sheds and underground tunnels, hammond dying from compys...
LW: inclusion of more characters and better new ones, dodgson is back, a lot of time is spent seeing how the dinosaurs behave in their natural enviornment, better kids, the dart guns are actually used, and no rex in san diego scene.
Only downside to the first novel is the ending that seemed rushed to me and it saying costa rica bombed the island afterward to kill the dinosaurs which seemed way too extreme and didnt make much sense.
Wow all that happened in the books now I really Want a movie series with everything that happens in the books. Also Dino’s climbed trees I really wanna see that.
I honestly don't understand the hate for this scene... it accomplished what the team set out to do far more effectively than their photography quest ever could have, and perfectly illustrates the fundamental concepts of the original JP novel that the JP movie completely lacked; human hubris and powers we don't understand and our ability to overlook dangers because of ignorance or simply because we choose to...
Also, considering how much CGI was in the movie even if you exclude the San Diego sequence, the whole idea that they added it just to show off CGI seems... dubious...
Which is completely inaccurate to reality, based on outdated interpretations of their foot bones...
Last edited:
Yes they fit in perfectly with all the other inaccurate dinosaurs.
My problem with san diego is that u have a sedated dinosaur caged in steel... Locked in a powerful cargo bay below deck.... Regardless of it being given adrenaline or whatever they gave it to make it super strong and agressive feeling no pain... There's no way it should have posed any threat of breaking its steel cage inside the cargo bay. YET we have EVERY person on deck massacred including the pilot who's arm was severed while hanging on the wheel... And some dead person holding the cargo hold button.. The whole scene is just dumb and makes no logical sense. The rex couldn't have gotten free or killed everyone on the ship from below deck.
You can argue the cargo hold was left open and in one crewmen's dying moments he closed the cargo hold to lock it in there as it chased the remaining crew below deck... But that's never stated as to be what happened.
It's too cliche. Things go wrong because they MUST go wrong...
In all honesty the whole premise of the movie being InGen going to Sorna to capture adult dinosaurs to bring to america makes no sense.... InGen could just make NEW dinosaurs from the mainland.
This is why the novel was better. There was no InGen involvement. It was Biosyn who sent people to the island to retrieve eggs (much more manageable). So they could engineer their own dinosaurs for research. This is a much better storyline then what the movie came up. The movie backed itself into a corner with their writing forcing them to come up with the ridiculous san diego event to prove their point that dinosaurs are a bad idea.... While simultaneously saying dinosaurs are also good and should be left alone as a biological preserve.......
You can argue the cargo hold was left open and in one crewmen's dying moments he closed the cargo hold to lock it in there as it chased the remaining crew below deck... But that's never stated as to be what happened.
It's too cliche. Things go wrong because they MUST go wrong...
In all honesty the whole premise of the movie being InGen going to Sorna to capture adult dinosaurs to bring to america makes no sense.... InGen could just make NEW dinosaurs from the mainland.
This is why the novel was better. There was no InGen involvement. It was Biosyn who sent people to the island to retrieve eggs (much more manageable). So they could engineer their own dinosaurs for research. This is a much better storyline then what the movie came up. The movie backed itself into a corner with their writing forcing them to come up with the ridiculous san diego event to prove their point that dinosaurs are a bad idea.... While simultaneously saying dinosaurs are also good and should be left alone as a biological preserve.......
Couldn't agree more.
wasent it raptors who got on board and killed the crew but they cut that scene out for some reason.
I think the jw movies are alright the indominus is a pretty cool Dino
I can go either way anymore with them because both have pretty decent strengths and weaknesses across the board.The novels took kind of a doomed path for the dinosaurs in the second novel with the whole DX prion sickness issue. The films are taking a path now where humanity is doomed, and admittedly that has more story telling potential to expand upon. So that is more compelling right now because it's taking a different path from the novels in a sense and is doing something else entirely.
Last edited:
I read JP when I was 9 and TLW the summer I turned 13 too
Further point in favour of the novels: ah, good memories...
First time I actually read the JP novels was near when TLW came out...mainly because the local library didn't have the book, though I did listen through the audiobook repeatedly since almost a year before the movie came out. Mainly because, at the time, I'd had a Ranger Rick subscription and there was an article/interview with the concept artist along with a lot of the artwork for the movie.
I am going to say the Evolution of Claire was a horribly done story that makes little sense for Claire as a character...but has several interesting things for the JP/JW lore in it popping up. From how Masrani advertised things and how the San Diego incident was handled, and the attempt to import Sorna Raptors for Jurassic World and the dinosaur enrichment for the young brachiosaur that they cloned for it.
Muldoon spends a good chunk of the story drunk, and Malcom is high on Morphine through most of it...and is high through most of The Lost World as well
I am going to say the Evolution of Claire was a horribly done story that makes little sense for Claire as a character...but has several interesting things for the JP/JW lore in it popping up. From how Masrani advertised things and how the San Diego incident was handled, and the attempt to import Sorna Raptors for Jurassic World and the dinosaur enrichment for the young brachiosaur that they cloned for it.
Muldoon doesn't go without a scratch, he pretty much screws over his leg during it and then teams up both Ellie and Genero (Who is a far better character there, the movie version is essentially the character of Regis with Genero's name and job) to deal with a lot of things. The only time Genero has a panic issue is when he's pressured into going into the Raptor nest near the end of the book.
Muldoon spends a good chunk of the story drunk, and Malcom is high on Morphine through most of it...and is high through most of The Lost World as well