CG DSS reward not given because we didn't reach tier 5

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.

Flossy

Volunteer Moderator
OK, will you take the word of a CG forum moderator (me)? Any CG is deemed to be a success on reaching Tier 1 and higher tiers are just extras sometimes for more facilities etc. This CG was a success and as such everyone who ended up in Top 75% or higher will received the DSS, probably sometime in the next few days, it's just not instant. :)
 
For comparison, from the Imperial ship-construction CG:

If successful, decals will be rewarded to the top 75% of participants by the 5th of December 3306.

That also reached tier 4. It was successful, I got the decal.
 
I hope they implement a tiered reward system for at least some CGs as having tier 1= 100% pass isn't really something that gets us involved in the story as the CG would have to be a disaster not to get there.

Plus I like the idea of them saying, "well you got to tier 8 out of 9, so you get the credits and the fancy module, but Earth gets blown up and the Alliance has been enslaved by the Thargoids."
 
OK, will you take the word of a CG forum moderator (me)? Any CG is deemed to be a success on reaching Tier 1 and higher tiers are just extras sometimes for more facilities etc. This CG was a success and as such everyone who ended up in Top 75% or higher will received the DSS, probably sometime in the next few days, it's just not instant. :)

Can you close the forum post for me please as I'm not sure how to do it.
 
OK, will you take the word of a CG forum moderator (me)? Any CG is deemed to be a success on reaching Tier 1 and higher tiers are just extras sometimes for more facilities etc. This CG was a success and as such everyone who ended up in Top 75% or higher will received the DSS, probably sometime in the next few days, it's just not instant. :)
that's bad news.
at least with nobody getting the DSS everybody who signed up would get the same global reward.
a chance for FDEV making wrong right passed!
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom